John Green, Father of the Little Girl Killed in Tuscon, is my New Hero

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#42
How about standing up for your rights in non violent ways? Start voting for 3rd parties. Heck what you get now isn't really much of a choice. Get involved. Don't just sit and complain? (not saying you do.. this is a more general 'you') Why do you need a gun to change your gov? Majority rules. You don't have a dictatorship... vote someone new in. Sure it might take a while, but faster than anarchy.

ETA: so why isn't great that you can choose to do all those other things I mentioned? (I mean here you still have a choice, just one is difficult and illegal) Why can't you choose in all states to marry the person you love? Why can't you choose to dump waste in your back yard?

Choice isn't the end all and be all if your choice endangers the life of others. My point is at what point is your right to choose dangerous activities that affect others (like carrying guns, speeding, drinking and driving...) is it ok, and not ok. I can kind of get the tradition angle.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#43
Proud to be a hat wearing American who has zero interest in owning a gun.
Well, your interests might change when police start being allowed (by passive people) to come busting down your door, forcing their way into your home with their swat suits and AK 47s raised.... with no probable cause, no warrant... because they think you might be the one who threw your cigarette butt out the car window back on the hwy. When they kick in your door to confiscate your reading material that is unlawful (because laws change with the times...*cough cough*) there you'll be, at their mercy. People need to uphold our constitution and keep the power in the hands of the citizens. And that means being within our rights to KILL anyone...with a gun... entering our homes without a warrant. Or creating a militia if it's necessary to prevent a gov. from over-taking the people. But yeah, you have that right to choose whether or not to keep a gun.

This good guy-bad guy thing is silly. That isn't even the main point. But I'll say it again. You're not going to stop drug trafficing. There are too many corrupt officials. You aren't going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. How can anyone willingly turn over their power to criminals and governements who act like criminals?

Now this time, I really am going. I have to do some chores. Stop being so interesting, will ya?:p
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#44
How about standing up for your rights in non violent ways? Start voting for 3rd parties. Heck what you get now isn't really much of a choice. Get involved. Don't just sit and complain? (not saying you do.. this is a more general 'you') Why do you need a gun to change your gov? Majority rules. You don't have a dictatorship... vote someone new in. Sure it might take a while, but faster than anarchy.

ETA: so why isn't great that you can choose to do all those other things I mentioned? (I mean here you still have a choice, just one is difficult and illegal) Why can't you choose in all states to marry the person you love? Why can't you choose to dump waste in your back yard?

Choice isn't the end all and be all if your choice endangers the life of others. My point is at what point is your right to choose dangerous activities that affect others (like carrying guns, speeding, drinking and driving...) is it ok, and not ok. I can kind of get the tradition angle.
I do think you should be able to choose to marry who you want. as for dumping waste in your own backyard... that affects other people negatively (smell, run off, etc) unless you live way out in the boonies with no one around you that it will affect... then dump whatever you want.

How are the guns in my basement endangering anyone's life? They are just sitting there. They get taken out for hunting which I guess endangers an animals life but that's kind of the point if we plan to eat it. but who are they endangering right now? no one. who are they affecting negatively right now? no one.

But anyway my point was CP doesn't want to own a gun and it's nice that there is the option to choose :)
 

Beanie

Clicker Cult Coordinator
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
14,012
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Illinois
#45
The obvious problem here is the opinion that carrying a gun is dangerous and affects the lives of other people. And that's an opinion to which both sides can present statistical evidence to back up their argument.

So this is going to go absolutely nowhere and it's ridiculous to continue.
 

corgipower

Tweleve Enthusiest
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
8,233
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
here
#46
Choice isn't the end all and be all if your choice endangers the life of others. My point is at what point is your right to choose dangerous activities that affect others (like carrying guns, speeding, drinking and driving...) is it ok, and not ok. I can kind of get the tradition angle.
The difference there is that if you're speeding/drinking and driving, you might try to brake/steer around whatever it is, but not be able to and now it's too late.

Carrying a gun has no effect on others and is not in itself dangerous.

Well, your interests might change when police start being allowed (by passive people) to come busting down your door, forcing their way into your home with their swat suits and AK 47s raised.... with no probable cause, no warrant... because they think you might be the one who threw your cigarette butt out the car window back on the hwy. When they kick in your door to confiscate your reading material that is unlawful (because laws change with the times...*cough cough*) there you'll be, at their mercy. People need to uphold our constitution and keep the power in the hands of the citizens. And that means being within our rights to KILL anyone...with a gun... entering our homes without a warrant. Or creating a militia if it's necessary to prevent a gov. from over-taking the people. But yeah, you have that right to choose whether or not to keep a gun.
Well, if it really does get to that point, I'll be moving in with Dekka...Snow and all. ;)
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#47
Oh well owning guns in your basement or for hunting.. is no biggie. Heck we can do that here.

I was discussing carrying guns around in public, the easy access to hand guns etc.

ETA.. wow.. OK. so having more guns in a population makes it no more likely to be shot with one? I am sorry but I have a hard time believing that. And would LOVE to see any stats that shows countries with more guns (legal) have less shootings. Or even less fatal/violent crime.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#48
I can choose to own a gun.

I just don't own one.

Guns aren't BANNED here. You just need a licence to get one. They're regulated.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#49
Yes you can have guns here too. And yes they are regulated. How and where you transport them is regulated too. No wandering around the streets with a gun.
 

corgipower

Tweleve Enthusiest
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
8,233
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
here
#50
But anyway my point was CP doesn't want to own a gun and it's nice that there is the option to choose :)
It is nice to have the choice. :D

Sometimes it feels like I'm not sufficiently American for making the choice to not own one though.

While I do support the right to own a gun, I have a hard time thinking that it's really a good thing when there are shootings in this city almost daily.
 

corgipower

Tweleve Enthusiest
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
8,233
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
here
#51
Guns aren't BANNED here. You just need a licence to get one. They're regulated.
You need a license here too and they're regulated. That doesn't stop people from acquiring them without a license or from using them to commit murders.
 

Beanie

Clicker Cult Coordinator
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
14,012
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Illinois
#52
John Lott's website

Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International Evidence


First, it is important to establish a pre-ban baseline and then compare it to similar research after the ban to determine crime trends. For that, we will reference the International Crime Victimization Surveys of 1992 and 2000. (3)

In general, the research shows that violent crime rates were lower in the UK than the United States in 1992. (Rated in percent of those interviewed responding ''yes'' to being victimized.)

* Burglary with entry: UK – 2.5% U.S. – 3.5%
* Robbery: UK – .9% U.S. – 1.7%
* Sexual assault of women: UK – .3% U.S. – 1.5%
* Assault with force: UK – 1.1% U.S. – 2.2%

In the 2000 survey the researchers combined the three violent crimes of robbery, rape, and assault into one category entitled ''Selected Contact Crime.'' Here is what they report (post-ban for UK.)

* Burglary with entry: UK – 2.8% U.S. – 1.8%
* Selected contact crime: UK – 3.6% U.S. – 1.9%

These two reports were done with essentially the same criteria and methods, and they clearly show that while selected violent crime rates rose 100% in the UK, they fell 65 % in the U.S. During this time, Britain outlawed private ownership of firearms, while over 70 million additional civilian firearms were sold in the U.S. (4) At the very least, a reasonable person is forced to conclude that availability of firearms to the general public is not a contributing factor to any increase in crime.

These trends are confirmed by Britain’s own Home Office. (5) In the period of 1997 through 2001, homicide rose 19% in the UK while it fell 12% in the USA. (6) Violent crime incidents rose 26% in the UK while falling 12% in the USA. (7) Robbery rates rose 92% in the UK and fell 15% in the USA. (8)
What_You_Dont_Know


As I said, there is no lack of statistics to back up either side - just go looking for it. It's really not hard to find.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#55
John Lott's website

Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International Evidence




What_You_Dont_Know


As I said, there is no lack of statistics to back up either side - just go looking for it. It's really not hard to find.

Thank you for providing this. I couldn't take the time to find such a good link, but know this is true. I read the whole article attached...very good. This is exactly what I've been trying to say...this part especially:

Referring back to the Founders’ quotes leading this section, pray tell me this: how are the people of the United Kingdom are going to force a redressing of grievances upon their government? They have surrendered their arms and their purse, and therefore have no protection against a government acting without restraint, nor do they have the means to show their government any spirit of resistance to flawed and deadly policy. Once again, the age-old lessons are being taught on yet another stage: absolute power corrupts absolutely; and if you surrender your personal responsibility to a government which promises to take care of you, they will only take care of themselves.:hail:

Conclusion
The English experience proves that guns and violence have no corresponding relationship that justifies gun control. Do we want to go down the same road as the UK when the evidence is so alarming? When the consequences could be so deadly? How will we force our government to return power to the people once it has taken it? :hail:

Perhaps gun control will go away when we have the ''Million Armed Mom March in Washington, D.C.'' Women will drive this issue when they ask the politicians, ''Tell me exactly how you expect me to defend my children against violent predators? If gun control is so wonderful, how come more women are being raped and children being abused in England since guns were banned? Do you plan to sacrifice our lives to pander to your moneyed sponsor/constituents? Or do you just want power so much that you don’t care who suffers?'':hail:

George Santayana coined the phrase: ''Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.'' To which I humbly wish to add: Those who have tasted power and developed an addiction to it, studied of history, intend to repeat it.
:hail:
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#56
I can handle being burgled, but I'd rather not be shot.

I mean, if I have a choice ;)
I'd rather get shot or stabbed than raped. Physical injury is much easier to overcome than emotional trauma of that magnitude. I've experienced both (being stabbed and raped, not in the same incident), along with other debilitating injuries and it was the rape that disabled me. I'd also much rather have the means to prevent myself or my family getting victimized in any way, again.

The actual statistics comparing Australian and American crime rates are very interesting. Most sources conclude that the Australian gun ban had little to no effect on murders, as they followed the same highs and lows American crime trends did, in some cases within a couple hundredths of a percent. Other violent crimes rose pretty drastically.

Just one link, but there are others.
AUSTRALIA: MORE VIOLENT CRIME DESPITE GUN BAN

Moreover, Australia and the United States -- where no gun-ban exists -- both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:

* Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America's rate dropped 31.7 percent.
* During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
* Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
* Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
* At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
* Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#57
My hunch is that if there are fewer illegal guns, then you'll have less gun crime.

I don't think legal guns are a significant part of the gun problem, and its very rare to hear of someone legally carrying a handgun committing a crime (And if they do, its usually not a random crime).

The problem is, no one has yet figured out a good way to reduce the number of illegal guns . . . yes, there's some bleed over from the legal ones, but that's probably not the main source.

Frankly, my personal beliefs aside, I think that a serious gun ban in the US would be futile. People who are inclined to obey the lay would get rid of their guns . . . but they wouldn't be the people who comitted gun crimes anyway. The crminals would still have guns. A bunch of otherwise law abiding citizens who believe in gun rights would suddenly become criminals . . . and THE NUMBER OF GUNS WOULD BE EXACTLY THE SAME. They wouldn't go anywhere . . . . and more would migrate into the hands of criminals. I suspect that if you had fewer guns to start with, a gun ban might have some meaningful effect (see, e.g. Japan). But here, forget it.

So, even leaving aside American culture and the Second Amendment, I see no reason to make a bunch of law abiding citizens who like guns into criminals.
 

corgipower

Tweleve Enthusiest
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
8,233
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
here
#58
I'd rather get shot or stabbed than raped. Physical injury is much easier to overcome than emotional trauma of that magnitude.
Unless the shot lands in the head or heart or some other fatal location...That's kind of not so easy to overcome, although I suppose afterward I wouldn't really care.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#60
I just think gun licenses are essay to easily accessible. And I don't get why people feel the need to go watch a movie with a gun in their pocket. But that's just a cultural difference.

What gets me are parents playing the victim card when their 5 year old gets a hold of the gun and shots his little sibling. That us YOUR own **** fault if you can't secure your gun properly. People that I know handle them way too casually. You want a gun for your protection in case someone breaks in at night? Well, keeping a loaded gun in your night stand us not the way to go. If you have a gun, be responsible and respectful.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top