John Green, Father of the Little Girl Killed in Tuscon, is my New Hero

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
IIRC, "free" slaves were allowed to have guns, at least at some point. You'd think that they'd do something against slavery.
Free blacks could own guns, but there were never many of them, and if they had done anything, they would no longer have been free and almost certainly would have been dead. Certain trusted slaves were allowed guns, but an old musket for hunting (or even 20 of them) were no match for the local white militia. Basically, black using a gun on a white man in the South was a black man committing suicide . . . and likely getting his friends and family killed as well.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
Honestly, Buckshot, there's very little evidence that people are not seeking treatment for mental illness because they are afraid of losing their gun rights. Instead it seems to be a combination of not realizing that they need help, not being able to afford help, and with the really sick, thinking that if they seek help something horrible will happen to them.

I am concerned that too broad a definition of "mental illness" will be used to take away the rights of people who are merely eccentric as well, but the larger problem at the moment seems to be that people who are manifestly, obviously, catastrophically psychotic are not receiving help, and in a few rare cases, those same individuals are getting guns and killing other people. Actually, I'm a lot more concerned with getting such people help than keeping guns out of their hands . . . because if they are getting help, they are significantly less dangerous than if they are not getting help.
Errrr . . . . not that there would BE any evidence, Lil. Not too many people are going to submit that information to a poll, and they aren't on record anywhere as refusing to seek treatment for fear of losing the right to legally own firearms. ;)

I do know, personally, more than a handful of people who have confided to me that they would like to seek counseling to better enable them to deal with the stresses of their lives, sort out some issues, etc., but can't because of this issue -- and in some cases it would involve losing their careers as well.

Our legal system deals with the issue of mental health largely based on information from the early 20th century, unfortunately.
 

AllieMackie

Wookie Collie
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
6,598
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ottawa, ON
I believe referring to forcing Canadian and European laws on America isn't necessarily coming just from statements made in this thread - but rather from a history of posts from certain individuals where it's quite clear what they think of America and Americans and how much BETTER it would be if America became Canada 2.0 or whatever.
^ This. Many of us try to suggest that "this works for my country, so there". The United States has its OWN involved history that is far, far, far different than Canada's or Europe. What works for Canada, Germany, UK, whatever may not work for the U.S., and that's okay.

As a Canadian I get really tired of the egocentrism a lot of Canadians feel they are entitled to. We aren't better. We aren't worse. We're just different.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
Settle down.

The gun argument never goes anywhere. As Coop said, we are hardly all Americans here. We all have different values and morals, and that includes ownership and use of firearms. These arguments never go anywhere, and as you've just proven, it usually devolves into statements of patriotism and not wanting the right to bear arms equalling a lack of pride.

You can keep pushing your country's pride on everyone here, but we all have our own things to be proud of too, and if stricter gun laws is one of those things, we have a right to feel that way, just as you have a right to bear your arms.

It's still going to be an endless cycle of "I'm right, you're wrong" until the thread dissolves and it starts up again in a few months. That was all I was commenting on. I'm not mocking anyone's beliefs, just the argument itself.
Settle down? Slim chance of that. :lol-sign:

I'm not pushing my beliefs on anyone who isn't receptive. I'm not trying to push anyone or deny you your rights to feel how you feel. I'm merely expressing my viewpoint. Isn't that the point of a forum?

This original topic was about something that happened in America. This is about trading American freedoms for a little temporary "security." This is what John Green, (the American man this thread is about) is standing for. I couldn't care less what other countries do about guns and their citizens. I care about America. I feel like John Green feels about freedom from oppression at the price of some risks.

I am not trying to take away the pride others feel for their country's ways. Never once did I mention anything derogatory about other countries. My whole purpose is to remind or educate other AMERICANS how we got out freedoms, how our country was founded in the first place. On account of citizens having guns and why we must never turn them over to any government ever. So, no...everyone here is not American. But every thread can not cater to everyone either. This one happens to have originated from the story of an American, John Green, whose ideals many of us share. If anyone finds it disdainful or distasteful, you don't have to read this thread.

Why are so many against having an "argument?" It's a healthy debate. What's wrong with that? I've seen a lot of good points made here by RTH, Lil, Laur, Renee and a few others...I forget now.

BTW: It is absolutely not irresponsible to carry a gun, safely in a gun rack on a pick-up truck. This is how people around here carry their guns when they're going hunting. It's absolutely normal and a very safe way to transport a gun. I have walked into the little corner store and there was a guy I know with a hand gun in a holster on his belt. I didn't think much about it. I've carried my hand gun in my back pocket on a few hikes I went on.

So, yeah, I don't get the gun phobia thing either. I grew up with them, was taught how to shoot and care for guns at a pretty early age. I went target shooting with my Dad every week end and I became a crack shot. He called me "Dead-eye." for a nick name. lol. I shot shot guns, a .22 Savage rifle, several hand guns. And now I own some assault rifles as well. They're fun to shoot targets. My sister had the same, typical hysteria type reaction: Only people who want to kill people have assault rifles. Nice sister, huh. So that means I have the mind of a murderer and have these guns because I can hardly wait to murder someone. No..assault rifles are exhilerating to shoot targets with, some are very light weight, no recoil, accurate, have great scopes...basically they're nice to have.....because....*get this* I can.

Here's hoping that Americans remember what this country stands for, how we got here, how regular citizens fought a bloody war and won our freedom from the oppression of a tyrannical government BECAUSE THEY HAD GUNS. Don't ever let the citizens be stripped of our ability to defend ourselves from a government which has gotten too powerful. Or from individual harm from evil criminals. Hold steadfast to your right to keep and bear arms. Stop government regulations which infringe on that right. They'll chip and widdle away and won't stop until they strip us bare. That is my plea to other Americans.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
4,155
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado
You said that the majority here are cowards, thieves and liars. Your words. I haven't seen where I wanted control over your life. Go find it. Challenge number 1.

Deciding who "deserves" freedom and who doesn't is the act of a dicatator. Look it up. Challeneg #2

As for spitting in the face of soldiers, you spit in mine just now. And my son's. Where and when did you serve? Challenge #3
If you agree with letting each person live in freedom, without being taxed on their ability to earn, if you agree to allow me to possess equipment to protect myself as I see fit as long as I am not creating victims then you have no desire to control me. If you think I should be taxed to benefit you or a cause you agree with, or think I should have restrictions even if I create no victim then you want control over me.

Whether I feel that you deserve freedom or not doesn't matter. Many people who did nothing to help the patriots in the war of independence still were able to reap the benefits of the freedom our patriots created as have I. Many didn't deserve it and many still don't and to many who fought in the revolution I would imagine that they would say I don't deserve freedom either because I have sat by and watched it errode. I can't understand how me feeling one way or another about your beliefs makes me a dictator. Perhaps you should look it up.

I served as an infantryman from 1984 through 1990 in the Army. My service did nothing for the freedom of Americans. It was political agenda. My oath was a farse. The very people who I swore to obey were the very people who were destroying the document I swore to defend. Many were there for the benefits, but none that I recall were there to defend the constitution. I would doubt that two men in a platoon of 40 could tell you seven articles in the Bill of Rights. They certainly couldn't tell you how their service secured those articles. As I got older I saw that the will of the majority was dangled like a golden carrot in front of young men who want to be important and make their mark on the world. We exploit that desire nicely. We send them to war in the name of freedom then we go to the voting booths and destroy it. To me we are shooting them in the back and exploiting their youthful minds and bodies to be a world super power, not defend the freedom of the people.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
I think you're walking on thin ice if you try and define freedom for the masses.

My version of freedom is not the same as yours, and no doubt if I stopped every person on the street tomorrow they'd all have a different answer.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
^ This. Many of us try to suggest that "this works for my country, so there". The United States has its OWN involved history that is far, far, far different than Canada's or Europe. What works for Canada, Germany, UK, whatever may not work for the U.S., and that's okay.

As a Canadian I get really tired of the egocentrism a lot of Canadians feel they are entitled to. We aren't better. We aren't worse. We're just different.
You know in some ways I don't buy this. In some areas (not nessisarily this one) some countries ARE better at somethings than others. Every country has its strengths and its weeknesses. But basically people are people everywhere.

No where did I see people saying one thing was right another wrong. I was merely trying to see from someone elses point of view by getting them to define their beliefs and explain the why of this.

I do get annoyed by the 'oh no its conflict stop it we should all get along' when some people percive thigns as America vs Canada (or what other country) when often that is not the case. A debate isn't about right or wrong... Its about discussing different ideas and seeing what comes out of it. *And yes often new things do come out even when conversations start over.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
You know in some ways I don't buy this. In some areas (not nessisarily this one) some countries ARE better at somethings than others. Every country has its strengths and its weeknesses. But basically people are people everywhere.

No where did I see people saying one thing was right another wrong. I was merely trying to see from someone elses point of view by getting them to define their beliefs and explain the why of this.

I do get annoyed by the 'oh no its conflict stop it we should all get along' when some people percive thigns as America vs Canada (or what other country) when often that is not the case. A debate isn't about right or wrong... Its about discussing different ideas and seeing what comes out of it. *And yes often new things do come out even when conversations start over.
I agree. You're absolutely, exactly right. Not wrong. Right. :rofl1:
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
4,155
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado
I think you're walking on thin ice if you try and define freedom for the masses.

My version of freedom is not the same as yours, and no doubt if I stopped every person on the street tomorrow they'd all have a different answer.
Really? Lets hear your version.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
Really? Lets hear your version.
What for? You to disagree, pick apart and try and crap on?

Boring. A lot has changed between now and a few years back. I understand how this place works a lot better ;)

Rather sit back and see what you come up with to be honest. Then be happy in my choices, and the world moves along :)

I soon as I saw you'd replied on this thread, I mentally bet myself you'd quoted my reply.

I believe I owe myself a fiver :D
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
I think you're walking on thin ice if you try and define freedom for the masses.

My version of freedom is not the same as yours, and no doubt if I stopped every person on the street tomorrow they'd all have a different answer.

Could you elaborate or explain this better for me? I don't get why it's walking on thin ice. And I don't get why it's complicated to define freedom or why there would be many versions of freedom. What does freedom mean to you and where do you feel a line should be drawn between freedom and oppression?

I have my answer. It's in America's constitution, bill of rights and amendments. And whatever liberties are not mentioned are also my freedoms and rights. These documents are by no means limited in what spells out our rights and freedoms. In other words, no government or man is allowed to grant or take away rights. (other than criminals') They just ARE....by nature.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
What for? You to disagree, pick apart and try and crap on?

Boring. A lot has changed between now and a few years back. I understand how this place works a lot better ;)

Rather sit back and see what you come up with to be honest. Then be happy in my choices, and the world moves along :)

I soon as I saw you'd replied on this thread, I mentally bet myself you'd quoted my reply.

I believe I owe myself a fiver :D
:hail::hail:
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
Could you elaborate or explain this better for me? I don't get why it's walking on thin ice. And I don't get why it's complicated to define freedom or why there would be many versions of freedom. What does freedom mean to you and where do you feel a line should be drawn between freedom and oppression?

I have my answer. It's in America's constitution, bill of rights and amendments. And whatever liberties are not mentioned are also my freedoms and rights. These documents are by no means limited in what spells out our rights and freedoms. In other words, no government or man is allowed to grant or take away rights. (other than criminals') They just ARE....by nature.
Freedom is what you're brought up believing, much like religion.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
4,155
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado
What for? You to disagree, pick apart and try and crap on?

Boring. A lot has changed between now and a few years back. I understand how this place works a lot better ;)

Rather sit back and see what you come up with to be honest. Then be happy in my choices, and the world moves along :)

I soon as I saw you'd replied on this thread, I mentally bet myself you'd quoted my reply.

I believe I owe myself a fiver :D
Wow that is some of your most thoughtful work I will give ya a high five too!
 

motherofmany

Clicker Extremist
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
482
Likes
0
Points
0
Conflating human rights with natural rights and with legal/civil rights might be part of the problem in defining "freedom." The constitution does not protect human and natural rights, it protects legal/civil rights.

I personally do not limit my rights to those set forth (enumerated or not) by a civil document.

I guess it comes down to whether a person subscribes to the interest or will theory of rights, which defacto makes them somewhat subjective.

So I agree with Dizzy, they will differ from person to person and from culture to culture as well.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
Freedom isn't even about whether you can or can't carry guns - they just interfere with promoting freedom for people who really need it.

As do fists, knives and any other weapons that people use to gain status.

Freedom shouldn't be about protecting yourself, it should be being free of disease, poverty and harm in all forms.

Guns are insignificant in my definition of freedom to be honest.
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
Freedom is what you're brought up believing, much like religion.
I really don't understand this statement at all. Are you saying that the women who are subject to circumcision where their clitoris is amputated to prevent them from enjoying sex and their vaginas sewn shut so they can't sleep with anybody before they are married free because they are raised that way?

Are slaves free if they are born into it, because they are raised to believe that's what they are entitled to?

This is what the dictionary says about freedom. I don't see how the definition is nebulous in the least. That's the beauty of language. Words have specific meanings which allow us to communicate precisely what we mean.

the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint: He won his freedom after a retrial.

exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.

the power to determine action without restraint.

the right to frequent, enjoy, or use at will: to have the freedom of a friend's library.

Philosophy . the power to exercise choice and make decisions without constraint from within or without; autonomy; self-determination. Compare necessity ( def. 7 ) .
Bolding is mine

Freedom | Define Freedom at Dictionary.com
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top