My puppy is from a backyard breeder.
The horrible, horrible conditions of being with his two dog parents and dog brothers and sisters. As well as two human children.
Awful conditions.
There is a difference in the "dog world" between a backyard breeder and a puppy mill. Puppy mills, pretty much by definition, keep mass numbers of dogs in cages with no regard for their well being. Backyard breeders oftentimes have fine conditions but their breeding dogs are lacking.
All the maltese, poodles in my cross are CKC registered. But the CKC (ACK in USA) will not recognise my dog. :doh:
I mean.. they shouldn't recognize my dog. The point is, the HEALTH LINES are from ACK CKC so where does it matter where he was born. These are genetics.
I'm not sure if you're writing ACK on purpose but it's the AKC (American Kennel Club).
Health lines from the AKC/CKC, could you please explain that? Unfortunately just being a breeder has AKC or CKC registered dogs does not mean they are health tested. We are in full agreement that wherever the dog is born has no bearing on his genetics- they come from the parents. Conditions aren't half as important to me as dam and sire and what they're made of. However... what do you know about the parents of your dog? Health testing, any sort of titles, anything?
I think you're assuming too much here.
There are many, many people on this board that are NOT fans of the AKC at all. Some people feel it could do more (like mandatory health testing), some feel that it is simply a registry. Certainly, no one thinks it is the be-all, end-all.
We're fans of healthy dogs, well looked after dogs (no, they don't have to be pampered, just decently cared for) and where a dog is purebred, that it is a good representative of it's breed.
Health testing is the best way we have to ensure that the progeny of animals ends up as free of genetics problems as possible. Health testing, as well as a guarantee from the breeder, are both expected from members here. Is it because we are fanatical members of some dog cult? No. It's because we don't like to see animals with preventable genetic disorders, but also, just as importantly we don't like to see the "mainstream dog owner" pay $300+ for a puppy, only to have it develop a genetic problem in 2 years, and then the poor dog owner is faced with having to kill their 2 year old dog or spend thousands trying (oftentimes in vain) to save it.
We don't make this **** up, lol. Really, it does happen, frequently, and it is a bad deal for everyone involved... except the breeder/mill, why would they care? Basically we want breeders to be accountable for the dogs they produce.
Puppymill dogs sold in pet stores are a bad deal because the dog and the new owner oftentimes end up suffering for it.
Real life example. Someone I know got a GSD from a local pet store. Gave the petstore 2 grand for it (!!!). GSD was a fine dog for them until it was 8 MONTHS OLD and developed such severe hip dysplasia that they ending up having it put down.
My GSD, is sired by a dog that was producing until he was about 10 or 11, I believe? And that dog was sired by a dog that was an active police k9 until 11. My dog is 2 years old and has never needed the vet for anything but mandatory shots for boarding.
That is just one, limited example. Everything has been done to ensure this dog I have won't get hip dysplasia. If my dog were to get HD, I would be compensated for it, and supported by the breeder.
Listen, if you've come here with an open mind it should be clear to you by now that you can just sit back, ask questions and learn. If you're going to be condescending and give out false information, I really wonder why you're here. No offense, but it's not like you've got a vast repertoire of dog knowledge to contribute.