Osama dead.

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Despite certain claims, it seems torture had nothing to do with his capture:

The Big Lie: Torture Got Bin Laden - The Dish | By Andrew Sullivan - The Daily Beast
Given the timing of this, I too doubt that "enhanced interrogation techniques" lead directly to this victory.

But, I know that "enhanced interrogation techniques" WORK. Yes, they really do. No, I don't care what the textbooks say.

Its not pretty of course, but if it saves ONE good guys life.... Its worth it.
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
Given the timing of this, I too doubt that "enhanced interrogation techniques" lead directly to this victory.

But, I know that "enhanced interrogation techniques" WORK. Yes, they really do. No, I don't care what the textbooks say.

Its not pretty of course, but if it saves ONE good guys life.... Its worth it.
Maybe. It depends on the context . . . we've talked about the difference between what you experienced and what happened under the Bush administration. But think of it this way . . you say its worth it if it saves the life of ONE good guy . . . but what if you torture several guys who don't know anything, in fact, several innocent guys, to before you get to someone who can help save your one good guy. Because that happened.

Its not that I don't believe it works. I'm quite certain it does . . . IF they know what you need to know, and IF you manage to ask the right questions. We know pretty much for certain now that several high value detainees told them all about their ties to Iraq . . . which didn't exist. Why? Because the people who were torturing them didn't believe them when they said there weren't any . . . and kept torturing them. We also know of endless wild goose chases produced by torture.

We also know, for a FACT, that we detained people for years, tortured them, and turned them over to other countries for even more extreme treatment, who were, in fact, innocent of any crime. They were cases of mistaken identity and bystanders. Not to mention the number of minor players and foot soldiers.

And these weren't battlefield interrogations or ticking time bombs. It went on for YEARS. With people who were well away from the battlefield, and thus did not have access to up to date information, and were no threat.

Worth it? Perhaps. If you know they know, if its life or death in the next 24 hours, yeah, perhaps. I certainly understand why people do it. And that has always gone on, and we both know it. When push comes to shove and hurting a bad guy will save a good guy, people will hurt the bad guy. They'll not talk about it, but they'll do it. And you'll be be hard pressed to find a jury to convict them.

But what we did for a decade, no, that's not worth it. Not at all. Not what it made us, and not the wrongs we did. Not what it did to our moral standing, to our image in the world, or to our self image. Not with the boundaries it crossed . . . we tortured citizens too, you know. Native born citizens. Yes, the one I know the story of was a terrorist. But he was also a citizen on US soil. How long before they do the same thing to right-wing extremists? Or eco-terrorists? Or drug dealers? Or child molesters? There's a constitutional prohibition against this, and we've crossed the line . . . and once we cross that line . . . who's next?
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
What if....


What if....


What if....


Lil... You are looking at this exactly how an attorney would. That is not a bad thing. But it certainly is not the way one can prosecute this 'war' and win it.

War is a ugly thing. It just IS. There is not a way to win a war "clean". Innocent people often suffer as the result of war. Should we try to be as 'nice' as possible? I guess so... But...

Fight to WIN or go home.

(The ladies are hollering at me to get moving... I'll be back in a bit.) LOL
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
What if....


What if....


What if....


Lil... You are looking at this exactly how an attorney would. That is not a bad thing. But it certainly is not the way one can prosecute this 'war' and win it.

War is a ugly thing. It just IS. There is not a way to win a war "clean". Innocent people often suffer as the result of war. Should we try to be as 'nice' as possible? I guess so... But...

Fight to WIN or go home.

(The ladies are hollering at me to get moving... I'll be back in a bit.) LOL
Innocent people will suffer. That's why we should avoid war if possible. But there's a different between collateral damage . . . and capturing innocent people, taking them away from their country, imprisoning them, and torturing them. I'm all for fighting to win; I just don't consider the torture of helpless human beings to be fighting.

That and there are laws of war. Those rules are the difference between being half-way civilized, and being savages. By your logic we should do whatever it takes . . .chemical weapons, nukes, carpet bombing . . . anything if it helps us win faster and saves our guys. But we are not savages. We're better than that, or at least we try to be.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Innocent people will suffer. That's why we should avoid war if possible. But there's a different between collateral damage . . . and capturing innocent people, taking them away from their country, imprisoning them, and torturing them. I'm all for fighting to win; I just don't consider the torture of helpless human beings to be fighting.

That and there are laws of war. Those rules are the difference between being half-way civilized, and being savages. By your logic we should do whatever it takes . . .chemical weapons, nukes, carpet bombing . . . anything if it helps us win faster and saves our guys. But we are not savages. We're better than that, or at least we try to be.
I understand all of this.

I'm not one of those people who think the prisoners at Gitmo are innocent. When you have a prisoner that you KNOW knows something....

"Laws" of war. Please.... I get all of that stuff. And yes, WHEN REASONABLE, we should try to not violate those rules.

Seriously... Obeying all the ****ing rules our ****ing politicians place on our troops ALREADY buries WAY more than should be. I'VE SEEN IT. The finest human being I ever knew is DEAD, because President Clinton did not want to lose his high poll numbers.

What the worst that could happen? People who already don't like us will like us less? Boo freaking hoo.

This is rambling... Sorry.
 

DougGeneration

D0G TR41N1NG N00B
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
52
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
CA
Hmm.. "Advance Interrogation Techniques"? I think I saw that from the movie Unthinkable! That is what you guys are talking about, right??
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
I understand all of this.

I'm not one of those people who think the prisoners at Gitmo are innocent. When you have a prisoner that you KNOW knows something....

"Laws" of war. Please.... I get all of that stuff. And yes, WHEN REASONABLE, we should try to not violate those rules.

Seriously... Obeying all the ****ing rules our ****ing politicians place on our troops ALREADY buries WAY more than should be. I'VE SEEN IT. The finest human being I ever knew is DEAD, because President Clinton did not want to lose his high poll numbers.

What the worst that could happen? People who already don't like us will like us less? Boo freaking hoo.

This is rambling... Sorry.
I never said all of the prisoners at Gitmo are innocent. Most of them aren't/weren't. But some of them were; that's a matter of public record. And a great many of them didn't know what we thought they knew. Sure, they were guilty, but there was no point in torturing them.

I don't think we are as far apart as we seem . . . what I really object to is not that we should mindlessly follow the rules, but that we should not make a policy of breaking them . . . not only make a policy of it, but brag about it while we are at it.

The statistics are pretty clear too . . . torture DID hurt our standing the world, especially with younger people who were not necessarily hostile, and also with our allies. And as for people who didn't like us . . . yeah, many of them didn't . . . and we showed them that we were just as bad as they thought we were.

Edit: Amending this . . . some things are always wrong. But there are some things that are outside of the "rules" that are probably acceptable under certain circumstances. However, the minute you make a policy to break those rules . . . well, there's always another exception. And as for the systematic mistreatment of prisoners, I have one response: Torture is wrong : Thoughts from Kansas.
 
Last edited:

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Well.... Soldiers have a saying about this kind of bullshit.

"I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6."

People who never have and never will know what its like to kill or be killed will always have a 'better' idea. Its cool to armchair QB military operations.

I know none of that will ever change and frankly, it shouldn't. I'm still gonna bitch about it.


---

BTW, where are all the people who were calling JSOC "Cheney's hitmen" now?
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
Well.... Soldiers have a saying about this kind of bullshit.

"I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6."

People who never have and never will know what its like to kill or be killed will always have a 'better' idea. Its cool to armchair QB military operations.

I know none of that will ever change and frankly, it shouldn't. I'm still gonna bitch about it.


---

BTW, where are all the people who were calling JSOC "Cheney's hitmen" now?

The difference was that at the time, the allegation was that they were answerable ONLY to Cheney . . . even Bush didn't know what was going on. This was ordered by the President, and went through normal channels. There's an article out there about exactly that issue. And I agree . . . its one thing when its ordered by the Commander in Chief . . its another thing when the VP decides to do things on his own, though his own special channels. The President ordering an assassination of a person who is threatening the country is probably legal; the VP doing so is not.

And actually, your sarcastic remark is perhaps the best judge of when the rules should be broken . . . if you are willing to risk facing a jury, then do it. In many cases, they won't convict someone who was justified, who was fighting for their life or that of another. But if you don't think you can explain yourself to a jury or a judge . . .perhaps you should be rethinking that course of action.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
And actually, your sarcastic remark is perhaps the best judge of when the rules should be broken . . . if you are willing to risk facing a jury, then do it. In many cases, they won't convict someone who was justified, who was fighting for their life or that of another. But if you don't think you can explain yourself to a jury or a judge . . .perhaps you should be rethinking that course of action.
LOL

"Rethinking"

Like there is TIME to 'think' when you have to make those choices. Its easy for a lawyer to tear apart a person for a split second decision made in the most stressful of moments.

Its almost always a good thing that most people will never know what it feels like to have to be in combat. Then there are times like this...
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
LOL

"Rethinking"

Like there is TIME to 'think' when you have to make those choices. Its easy for a lawyer to tear apart a person for a split second decision made in the most stressful of moments.

Its almost always a good thing that most people will never know what it feels like to have to be in combat. Then there are times like this...
What was going on at Gitmo, at Bagram, at Abu Garub were not combat. They had PLENTY of time to think. Enough time to get fake legal opinions. I'm honestly not inclined to judge someone whose being shot at . . . but I will judge someone who is choosing to torture a helpless human being in relative safety. I'm not inclined to judge people who have seconds, or minutes, or even mere hours, to make a decision that may cost lives or save them . . . but I WILL judge them when they have plenty of time to make that decision, or when they chose the darkest option as a matter of course.

You see torture as a battlefield issue. Frankly, I can't evaluate that, since I hope to spend my life as far from any physical battlefield as humanly possible. But its NOT just a battlefield issue . . . the vast majority of the problem here went on under conditions over which we had complete control. We're not talking about snap decisions. We're talking about systematic policies that went on for years and involved hundreds of people. Its just not the same thing.

Look, to draw a loose analogy from the general law of war, its perfectly fine to shoot an armed enemy in battle. That's what a war is. It is NOT acceptable to shoot a POW. Why? Because the situation is under control . .they are helpless and at your mercy. The whole "torture" debate is about people that we had prisoner, and by and large, had prisoner in controlled facilities, and for long periods of time. Heck, at least one of them was in the US in a military prison. This is just NOT the same as combat.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
What was going on at Gitmo, at Bagram, at Abu Garub were not combat. They had PLENTY of time to think. Enough time to get fake legal opinions. I'm honestly not inclined to judge someone whose being shot at . . . but I will judge someone who is choosing to torture a helpless human being in relative safety. I'm not inclined to judge people who have seconds, or minutes, or even mere hours, to make a decision that may cost lives or save them . . . but I WILL judge them when they have plenty of time to make that decision, or when they chose the darkest option as a matter of course.

You see torture as a battlefield issue. Frankly, I can't evaluate that, since I hope to spend my life as far from any physical battlefield as humanly possible. But its NOT just a battlefield issue . . . the vast majority of the problem here went on under conditions over which we had complete control. We're not talking about snap decisions. We're talking about systematic policies that went on for years and involved hundreds of people. Its just not the same thing.
This.
 

Beanie

Clicker Cult Coordinator
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
14,012
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Illinois
A Symbol Of Compassion, Dalai Lama Hints Bin Laden's Killing Was Justified : The Two-Way : NPR

As a human being, Bin Laden may have deserved compassion and even forgiveness, the Dalai Lama said in answer to a question about the assassination of the Al Qaeda leader. But, he said, "Forgiveness doesn't mean forget what happened. ... If something is serious and it is necessary to take counter-measures, you have to take counter-measures."
I would so like to hang out with the Dalai Lama one day. Buy him a soda or something.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
What was going on at Gitmo, at Bagram, at Abu Garub were not combat. They had PLENTY of time to think. Enough time to get fake legal opinions. I'm honestly not inclined to judge someone whose being shot at . . . but I will judge someone who is choosing to torture a helpless human being in relative safety. I'm not inclined to judge people who have seconds, or minutes, or even mere hours, to make a decision that may cost lives or save them . . . but I WILL judge them when they have plenty of time to make that decision, or when they chose the darkest option as a matter of course.
OK.

The bad guys who know the stuff we need to learn to prosecute this very unconventional conflict are, as I am sure you know, dedicated fanatics. I really cannot think of a 'civilized' way to extract what we need to learn from such people, other than to get brutal.

All I know is this.... IT WORKS. Never forget that these animals are trying to kill innocent people.

But I understand the reasons why we should not do it. It's really an impossible situation. This enemy knows they can't fight us on even terms. They also know how the west views such things and uses it to their advantage.

If you have a better idea how to fight this war, I honestly would like to hear it. Because the way things are now, we are going to be fighting this war forever. Think about that.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
4,381
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Midwest
considering this "war" has been on going for thousands of years already, i'm not so sure it's ever going to be over until everyone is all gone. And I do mean everyone
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
OK.

The bad guys who know the stuff we need to learn to prosecute this very unconventional conflict are, as I am sure you know, dedicated fanatics. I really cannot think of a 'civilized' way to extract what we need to learn from such people, other than to get brutal.

All I know is this.... IT WORKS. Never forget that these animals are trying to kill innocent people.

But I understand the reasons why we should not do it. It's really an impossible situation. This enemy knows they can't fight us on even terms. They also know how the west views such things and uses it to their advantage.

If you have a better idea how to fight this war, I honestly would like to hear it. Because the way things are now, we are going to be fighting this war forever. Think about that.
Oddly, there is extensive evidence that shows that whether or not it works, other methods also work. A lot of these guys are surprisingly willing to talk, if only because they don't have much else better to do. There has been a lot of research on this area, and no matter what a lot of people want to say, there's little proof that torture in any way produces enough quality information to make it worth the cost (moral, reputational, etc), let alone that it the only option.

And I repeat, its wrong. Its a violation of everything we believe in. As for this war . . . what war? I see three wars in the Middle East that we could, if we wanted to, leave at any time. One of them we should never have fought in the first place. As for terrorism here . . .there ain't much, and as far as anyone has been able to show, not ONE terrorist attack here has been prevented by information gained from torture. Cheney has hinted about such things, but Cheney is bluntly NOT a reliable source of information. Yeah, they may have declared "war" on us, but so what?

And as Hounds pointed out, if the war is against "terror" it will never end. Ever. There will always be people willing to do horrible things for political and religious reasons. If we want our country back, our liberties back, we just have to accept that. And this torture thing is PART of what they did to our freedoms since 9/11 . . . just because they haven't done it to any white, non-Muslim US citizens yet . . . the right not to be tortured, the right to a trial, the right to habeus corpus . . . those are OUR rights. And when we cheapen them, when we take them away from just those people, its the first step to taking them away from me and you.

Yes, I am horribly upset about the innocent people who have been caught up in this system. I can think of few greater injustices, and I am ashamed that my country was involved in them and refuses to make restitution. But it should not happen to the guilty either. Not because I have any sympathy for many of those turds disguised as human beings, but because if no one speaks for them, the precedent is set. It will be easier the next time, for the next group for which no one has sympathy. I've already heard people talk about treating the Mexican drug gangs as terrorists, using all our "special" powers on them. And if them, why not ordinary drug dealers? You see where this is leading.

I also ask what is the point of winning a war when we give up the very thing we claim to be fighting for. Yes, we are still better than them. But we are not who we were.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Ya know Lil... I have to excuse myself from this.

It is entirely too personal.

I just cannot think of anything to say to you that is nice right now. I only wish you could have been there THAT day.

You would think all your books, 'studies', etc are full of **** too.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top