If you were given the choice of using physical correction or no physical correction to achieve a behavior, both being equal in compliance...which would you choose?
I only ask this because of all of the debate going on about why some people choose, and I do mean CHOOSE, to physically correct, when there is more than ample proof that it is not necessary.
I am honestly confused. I really want to know what I'm missing in the reasoning here.
There are so many K-9 unit trainers, behaviorists and civilian dog trainers SUCCESSFULLY training RELIABLE working dogs without the use of a stave, choke chain yanks, or any other harsh aversive. This is not a dream folks, it's reality. Why would anyone actually CHOOSE to travel BACK in time?
I only ask this because of all of the debate going on about why some people choose, and I do mean CHOOSE, to physically correct, when there is more than ample proof that it is not necessary.
I am honestly confused. I really want to know what I'm missing in the reasoning here.
There are so many K-9 unit trainers, behaviorists and civilian dog trainers SUCCESSFULLY training RELIABLE working dogs without the use of a stave, choke chain yanks, or any other harsh aversive. This is not a dream folks, it's reality. Why would anyone actually CHOOSE to travel BACK in time?