Slap me... Used an e-collar :O

MomOf7

Evil Kitty taco eater
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
3,437
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
WA.
#41
i actually had no idea they were used so frequently in competitions!!

And yeah, oakley too, knows his commands. In short, one example: oakley would FLIP OUT every time he would see another dog on the walk...he would act SOOO aggressive towards the dog, and would be snapping at us at the same time...it was SCARY...when in reality,had he been able to meet the dog, he woulda been super friendly...

when he was in this crazed state, he wouldnt follow his orders to "sit", "down" etc. Now, he just doesnt get like that at all (unless he is on a leash, but we can easily control him now), and completely ignores the other dog. why? cause he finally got some sense smacked into him that no matter how hard he tried, he was NOT gonna get to play...and all he would get to do was sit there and feel sorry for himself, lol. The shock reinforced the SIT that we were instructing him to do...it had nothing to do with the bad behavior.

he was taught in such a way that he *thinks* we are protecting him from the shock. Like, that we can see it coming, and we tell him what to do to avoid it!!

the results are an incredibly obedient dog when we want, but no less of the "good" oakley personality (the crazy, hyper, spastic, playful dog we all love :p ) The only time he is in fear that he will get shocked is when we give him a command. He can the obey, knowing nothing will happen...or disobey, and get shocked.

It obviously worked for you with no adverse effects. I would be careful next time though. Maybe find a good collar conditioning book and a good trainer to help. A E-collar can and will cause the problem to get worse if you dont use it properly.
 
W

whatszmatter

Guest
#42
Its amazing for a dog that "doesn't know what its being corrected for" how fast they learn. How fast they stop breaking eye contact, how fast they stop breaking long downs, how fast they stop running thru doors, etc.

Communication needs to be clear to a dog, the best trainers know how to effectively communicate with their dogs exactly what they want from them.

again we have a situation where nobody is there, nobody has worked the dog, nobody has done anything but read on the interent. Roxy is not broken, her spirit isn't crushed, I highly doubt these doomsday scenerios of her lashing out to just bite someone have increased because of the ecollar. and we have a handler that is happy with her results, happy with her dog, and yet feels guilty about something she should not.
 

Dreeza

Active Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
6,359
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
38
Location
Arlington, VA
#43
It obviously worked for you with no adverse effects. I would be careful next time though. Maybe find a good collar conditioning book and a good trainer to help. A E-collar can and will cause the problem to get worse if you dont use it properly.
lol, i left out a MAJOR detail.

Oakley actually got sent away for a month (yes, a very controversial thing to do...) with a professional trainer (he has trained like 40,000 dogs or something rediculous like that...i forget, i remember not thinking the number was possible, lol)

he then trained us to use it, and has done a checkup or 2 since we got him back.
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#45
I don't agree with using the e-collar either, but Roxy will forgive you ;)

I've tried the whole "correction for aggression" routine. Did it for almost a year with Ripley. Did it suppress the behavior? Yes. Did it give the illusion of a trained dog? Yes. Did it come back to bite me (and the friendly fedex guy) in the ass? YES.

I was punishing the growl. The punishment suppressed the growl but didn't affect the way Ripley viewed strangers. Eventually, someone pushed it too far and Ripley bit him, drawing blood. It was the kind of bite that people say is "out of the blue". If there was a warning growl, that bite could have been avoided. That was the turning point for me and I switched to positive methods.

What would I do? Honestly, I am not sure if I would even attempt to compete with a dog like Roxy. It's admirable that you are putting all this work into her, but some dogs will never be reliable enough for competition. I know exactly how you feel about wanting to compete with her, Ripley reminds me a lot of Roxy. He may be friendly for a SFE one day, he may snap at the judge the next. Sometimes he just doesn't want attention from strangers and there is nothing I can do to MAKE him want attention from them.

I hate to say something like this because it sounds so fickle, but if you want to compete in obedience, why not try with another dog without this "sauciness"? Can you compete with Hades? Why not compete with Roxy in a sport like agility, or try Rally?

I just wouldn't punish warning signals like that. Take it from someone who's done it and learned from the screwup . . . It's not a good way to go.
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#46
OK, I've got a lot to address today! LOL

I came from my house thinking this thread would be long dead, but apparently not.

So here we go:

Doberluv- I contemplated, a little too late, when the collar was already on her, whether she would understand what the correction was for. But as I stated in a previous post, I firmly believe she knew that the correction was for the watch me.

We use the command watch me often. During heeling, before I leave her side on a wait and I perhaps may only be giving a hand signal with no verbal, when she barks incessantly at the people outside and it goes on. She knows the command well.

The reason I believe she understood what the correction was for, was because after the first three times she got a zap, she would maintain eye contact and the lip curl still continued. Yes, everyone is right, when they say clearly she is still uncomfortable. Quest has given me much more to think about, regarding her "safety zone".

I'm trying as best as I can to NOT sound defensive, because if an idea that's not the same as others I've tried, that is a positive method is mentioned, I will happily resort to it. But as Whatzmatter's already stated for me, this was definitely NOT a first choice. Many of the positive methods mentioned for us a few months ago, have already been exhausted with no change whatsoever.

I think as many of stated, it's so very hard to give advice over the internet, especially without knowing Roxy, or any dog for that matter. And I don't want to make her sound different than the average, but basically she is. LOL.

As so many of her "issues" circle around the fact that ROxy is more complicated than your average dog. When compared to Hades she does often get labelled plenty of human terms that would not normally apply to dogs. Her basic needs are so much more than food, water and love. She is complex.

The main reason I've resorted to this method is because of this:

The previous, positive method stated, involving only verbal aversives in almost a year has made absolutely NO progress. Roxy is the one clearly deciding when she wants to be touched and in what position.

As silverpawz stated, using obedience to control a HA dog DOES work. And it's worked so far in other situations and areas of Roxy's and my life together.

As for how she reacted to the collar. Your supposed to see a slight ear twitch, the level of stimulation varies for every dog. At one half level, Roxy shows no stimulation at all. At 1, sometimes her ear twitches other times it doesn't.

Silverpawz, Roxy has a solid stand stay, (without the examination part) won't break it for anything. I can tug on her leash, try to push her, probably fire a gun. The dog won't budge.

My trainer stood a few feet to the side of Roxy. As soon as she began to move towards Roxy, when Roxy went to turn her head, I "stimulated" her. Sometimes she wasn't even going to snarl, just watch her until she got closer.

Immediately she'd look at me. (As I was stimulating her, I would command "watch me" again) As soon as we got eye contact again, she got a verbal reward and a treat. She never moved a foot, during either three times.

After each session when she was released, it was just as normal. She jumped around, mouth open tail wagging, she'd run up to my trainer hoping for a treat etc.

Yes, even when she wasn't snarling, and keeping eye contact with me, she did look uncomfortable. Like any other method, I don't expect anything to happen overnight.

I only hope, that with enough good SFE's with the help of the collar, she'll soon realize that the act of someone examining her is NOT a bad thing. It doesn't hurt her anymore than a leash correction. And quite simply, I don't see her getting shocked too much more seeing as she already beginning to understand the concept. (I've been doing it at home with people she knows without the collar, and after a few verbal aversives she kept eye contact)

There are so many other areas of her life, that this will apply to other than competition in a positive way. Vet visits for that matter would no longer require muzzling the entire time for one.

But competition and not muzzling at the vet's are all things that aren't really that important. She can be muzzled. No, we do not have to compete. But if with training, we can do those things, why not?

So far, with one session, I do not see a changed dog. She neither acted differently with me or my trainer imediately after. And if I see any change in the trust and bond we share, you better believe the dreams of competing will be flushed down the toilet.

The facts are this. We all put our dogs in uncomfortable situations, in the hopes of desensitizing them so they become COMFORTABLE for them.

But there's always those first few group classes where your puppy is clearly uncomfortable. Do we stop going because of that? Heck no! We praise them and try our best to make them comfortable and hope that they'll GET USED TO IT.

What about the DA dog that goes to class and acts out aggressively? You work with it, train with it in the hopes that one day, it will be manageable. Whatever method you use, no matter. The fact that you do it safely and your goals is what I'm trying to make clear.

Silverpawz, the cheese idea is a good one, but that's already been exhausted with weiners and 10 dollar ZUke's treats! LOL

And PB gives her the runs! LOL. That's basically the method we've used over the past 9, 10 months. Constantly feeding her yummy treats while she quickly pats her. No change. As soon as the treats are gone the teeth come out.

So this has become quite long, but I hope I've made my goals and the reasons for those clear. ANd perhaps put my decision into perspective for some of you.

I know you all may not agree with the method, but IMO I trully have exhausted all other routes with her.

RD- I almost forgot, LOL, unfortunately, despite how quickly Hades is coming along he cannot compete. The ban in Ontario requires all pitbulls to be muzzled in public areas, and from my understanding they cannot compete.
 

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#47
The facts are this. We all put our dogs in uncomfortable situations, in the hopes of desensitizing them so they become COMFORTABLE for them.
punishment is not desensitization. you are NOT making her more comfortable. punishment INCREASES stress. there have been studies done on this. it's not supposition, it's proven fact.

what you are trying to get is not a dog who is comfortable with the situation. you are trying to get a dog who doesn't curl her lip. it's not the same thing.
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#49
Elegy, my ultimate goal is to make her comfortable. But to reach that goal, we have to get her into that situation safely. By maintaing eye contact, she cannot hurt my trainer, she never has, but in prior attempts she has snapped.

My *ultimate* goal is not for her to put up with it. But to get used to it and be comfortable! She's comfortable when my trainer gives her a rough pat after a good retrieve or heel or what not.

I want to put her in this situation enough SAFELY, so she realizes that there is nothing to fear. That is my ultimate goal.

Yes, I do not want her to curl her lip. But the reason I don't want her to curl her lip ultimately is because she's comfortable. To begin with, she won't curl her lip because of the maintained eye contact. As I stated, yes, she was still clearly uncomfortable. My hope and goal, is with enough "good" SFE's and some high value rewards she will become comfortable.

Just as a DA dog who would normally lunge at another, with training, yes some use physical aversives such as a leash correction combined with a reward, (balanced training) and desensitization can eventually be left in a sit/down stay, merely feet away from another dog and behave beautifully.

Using some balanced training with Roxy, who is more than able to handle some corrections, that is the goal.

Is the DA dog sitting next to another dog uncomfortable ALWAYS?

No. They get used to the situation, they understand it and sometimes, as mentioned in other threads, you would never know that dog was DA.

Just as my hope with Roxy. I hope that her focus on me will be so strong, that you would never be able to tell that she was HA, and in that situation she is NOT. She is not so uncomfortable that she could snap. Long before she heads to trial, she will already be at the point where she is comfortable with a SFE. Not just "putting up with it", which IS one of the steps of desensitizing a dog. A stage where their obedience overrules their own "feelings" of being uncomfortable, and eventually, they are comfortable.

Kris- I wouldn't say they perked. On the times where she did show any sign of stimulation, they "twitched". Sometimes she shaked her head a little bit, which in that video said was a natural "first reaction". She never tried to paw it off, and she wore it during the whole lesson.

There were times where she did obey my command and showed no stimulation at all. Which according to the lady who uses them frequently for hunt tests means they are in no way uncomfortable, but they are getting that "tap on the shoulder". Which is what the e-collar is to me.

Verbal aversives have been used with Roxy and sometimes she chooses to obey them and sometimes she does not. So, in the situation where she does show her teeth it is not enough. (When I practice at home with people she knows she does not show her teeth)

Even if an option was to give her a leash correction, I simply cannot get in fast enough to give it to her. The e-collar is very quick, I believe the momentary stim is about half a second and happens immediately. It's fast, it's not "painful" and with perfect timing it appears this could be the stepping stone to put Roxy in this situation enough, with polite enough manners where she can learn this is not a bad thing.

Roxy being such a "tough" dog is also a reason the e-collar has been used. On a dog like Hades, I would never even use it as a last resort. Some dogs, simply can not handle it. Some can.

Many people in field trials use it. Around here it's a common thing. Why? Because when the dog is 100feet away from you, not responding to your commands, it's a quick, painless way to get your message across, even from far away.

The "invisible leash" as many like to call it.
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#50
Roxy, I believe some that have replied don't know what it truly is like to have a dog like yours. But, I do. And I know that using an aversive with him worked as well. Call it coincidence if you like, but it worked.

If it means anything, I applaud you for using this e-collar in a respectable way. You are not at all just shocking the heck out of your dog. YOu are using this aversive with a combination of positive reinforcment to control a "snooty" dog. Though I myself don't normally like e-collars at all, there are situations that call for them. And to say what you did was WRONG and in no way forgivable at all would be downright closed minded and bigoted. You TRIED doing it the right way. I've read your previous posts and struggles. I commend you for doing that. And though you had to resort to the e-collar, I still commend you for doing it in the kindest and most positive way you could. Kudos for you, Roxy. :)
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#51
Tessa: Calling those of us who disagree with using the e-collar "closed minded and bigoted" is a bit harsh. It isn't the e-collar that I didn't like, it's using it for the control/treatment of aggression that I have a problem with. I'm a novice trainer though, I obviously don't know everything.

I do know what it's like to have a dog like Roxy. Ripley is weird, and "complex" as Cadence described Roxy. Every time I read one of her posts about Roxy I can understand her frustration! I just don't think this was the best way to go about training her to not display aggression.
At the same time, I don't think badgering her about this is going to help much. Now that most of us have said our piece, why not make some suggestions on how to get a solid SFE from Roxy without using the e-collar?

I think I posted here before about what I do with the aggressive shelter dogs. It's not very complex but it's worked for all of them . . . The reward for the dog is the absense of the human they don't like. First figure out how close Roxy will allow the trainer to get before displaying the lip curl, and then take it one step back. When the trainer is near Roxy and Roxy is not showing teeth, praise her, immediately have the trainer back off, give Roxy a treat and release her. Gradually build up the amount of time Roxy will need to tolerate the trainer's presence without a lip curl. Once she'll reliably let the trainer stand near her, have the trainer touch her briefly. If she doesn't curl her lip, click/praise and immediately send the trainer away, give her the treat. If it gets pushed too far and Roxy does a lip curl, the trainer will stand there until she stops. As soon as she stops, the behavior is marked, she is given a treat and the trainer leaves the room. Fast forward 5-10 sessions and you will be building up the amount of time that Roxy will allow the trainer to touch her before she hears the click and the trainer backs off. Once she is very reliable about calmly letting someone touch her, you no longer feed her the treat. You give them the treat and have them feed her, thus building a positive association with having a person approach to examine her. If she's like Ripley and usually doesn't take treats from strangers, give the trainer an irresistable treat and don't feed Roxy for several hours before that session.

You probably have already tried this but its worth a shot if you haven't. It's worked very well for the shelter dogs as well as for my own dog - Ripley's human aggression has really turned around.
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#52
RD, I called no one "closed minded and bigoted". Yes, those words were used in my posts, but I called no one those things. I'm simply stating that life is not black and white. There are grey areas, and sometimes when a respectable person has to resort to a not so respectable aversive, instead of judging and badgering a person about how horrible it is, we should forgive, move on, and be happy that this person has got the behavior they wanted. As I said, it wasn't as if Roxy here was shocking the heck out of her dog. She paired the use of this aversive with positive reinforcement in hopes of changing this behavior. Now, I don't like that aggression was used against aggression, but it got the results she wanted.
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#53
Firstly, thank you Tessa for the kind words. I know you for one as a trainer do not use those kinds of methods, but the fact that you understand my frusterations is nice to hear. Thank you :)

RD- Actually no, I have not used that method. I am more than willing to try it though. She is fine with my trainer in every other aspect, and does accept treats from her. Thank you for a positive option! Not just pointing the finger though! LOL

The problem with the positive methods and this issue is that it's the very event, very situation that Roxy immediately acknowledges and becomes uncomfortable. As soon as I leave her side for the SFE she becomes "defensive".

But honestly, that does sound like a great idea. Like any other method it could take awhile, but as I've said, if a positive method unlike the others I've tried is mentioned, I'll go for it!

Even still though, with this method, I'd like to incorporate the watch me. For my own mind, it seems to make it "safer". With other obedience skills we use to control her HA, watch me during the SFE would put my mind at a bit more ease, knowing that once she truly understands the concept and we practice and practice, she will NOT break that command, like the others we already use.

Thank you so much RD and Tessa. The only person so far that Roxy has shown her aggressive tendencies during the SFE is my trainer, no one other than my parents or my bf has done it with her. So, next Thursday, we will start with this method. Like me, my trainer is also very frusterated and this is something unlike other things we've tried. She sees my ambition and sees Roxy drive and how easily she picks up on hard obedience skills. She's just as frusterated and anxious as I am! LOL

Thanks again everyone :)
 

MomOf7

Evil Kitty taco eater
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
3,437
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
WA.
#54
Sounds like your on the right track with the E-Collar. Once she is more conditioned to it her ears will more than likely perk. Its an attention getter (tap on the shoulder).
Im glad you have someone who knows what they are doing helping you. Its very important to know how to use it properly and when to use it.
Its the how the when, how much pressure to appy, and when to move back a little when the concepts are confusing the dog. Knowing how to feel these things out is key.
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#55
Cadence, try not leaving her at first. If you stand directly in front of her is she still uncomfortable? If she's okay with you very close to her, start off like that. Get her comfortable with your trainer touching her, with you standing right there, then gradually increase the distance between the two of you.

The way I go about increasing distance is by flip-flopping a little. Sometimes I'll take one step away, then I'll take 3 steps away, then I'll take 2, then I'll take 4, then 3, then 6, etc. I'm gradually increasing the number of steps I take, without the dog really noticing. Dakota used to count my steps and would break if I went much further than 20 feet away. :rolleyes:

Incorporating the watch me is a good idea, but be careful about overloading her on commands. Even Dakota, who is very sweet to people, will get a little uneasy if he is told to stand, stay, watch me and ignore the person trying to pet him. KWIM? It's a lot to focus on and too much mental stress can make her irritable.

The SFE is Dakota's worst exercise, too. Not because he's uncomfortable with people touching him, but because the little snot won't stay in one place when someone pets him. He always wants to move closer to them and suck up. :rolleyes:

Good luck if you decide to try it! I can't say it's the best method out there since I haven't tried many others, but it's worked really well for me.
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#56
Okay, let me get this straight. Roxy will now sometimes accept your trainer to examine her during the stand for exam? Correct?

If that is so, you've got what you need! Now that you DO have something to reward, RD's wonderful advice should work wonders!

But remember, for this to work, she's also got to accept others. If she's not happy with your trainer touching her, you have to train with others too, to proof that behavior.

Goodluck Cadence. :) I hope to see you and Roxy having fun in those obedience rings! :)
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#57
Yes, Tessa. After the first few time with the collar, she did begin to accept it. By the last time there was no lip curl at all.

And that's exactly my point! To use the collar to get some kind of behaviour that I want so I can heavily reward.

And yes, as you said, there are a few more serious trainers who come to class for the distraction who are more than willing to offer up their hands LOL. But that would be much later on, when she's fully accepting, and comfortable with only my trainer.

RD, she's no better if I'm closer to her! LOL. Exact same reaction, watches her come in, and as soon as she gets in close, the teeth come out. Regardless of whether I'm six feet away or one.

She's much more accepting during other exercises though when I'm further away. A protectiveness of me we've all decided. But that guarding of me, has gotten better with my trainer. The first private lesson, included me and my trainer 10 feet away speaking to me. If she got any closer, ROxy would run from whatever she was sniffing and step between her and I.

This protectiveness is slowly, gradually getting "turned down".

Thanks you two ;)
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#58
I see what you're saying, then. She has an issue with being touched, period, if it's not on her terms. It's not JUST the SFE, but the SFE is the only exercise in which she gets touched.

Does your trainer look away from Roxy while she's approaching, or does she keep her eyes on the dog at all times? Perhaps less eye contact would make her less intimidating to the dog.

Also, since Roxy doesn't like to be touched, maybe you could try alternating the exercises. Sometimes just have the trainer stand next to her, walk around her, etc and then give her a treat, without touching. Then the next time, have a little bit of physical contact and LOTS of treats, a game too afterwards if Roxy likes to play fetch, tug etc.

I really hope this works for you and Roxy. Good luck!
 
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
891
Likes
0
Points
0
#59
This doesn't sound like fear to me. It sounds like she's picking and chooseing when she'll tolerate being petted. All aggression is not fear based. Much of it is, but not all.
That statement is so true. Everyone on here says Caza is fearful of people, PUH-LEASE!!!! Some dogs just dont want to be touched, WHAT'S SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND!!! Would you like strange people running up to you pulling your hair and touching you, I sure as hell dont.

Roxy, your dog needs to understand when its time to work, I dont care what her problem is, get over it. When you guys are not in training she doesnt have to be touched, but the stand for examination is a must, and she has to get over it. Caza at first wasnt too happy about it, but soon realized that it was unacceptable. I wont get into it becuase I really dont want to have the "your correcting the signal not the behavior" "just going to make the dog outright attack" argument, its not even worth my time. But I will tell you good luck with Roxy, and I know where you are coming from :) .
 
P

Purdue#1

Guest
#60
i agree, some dogs just have to be taught to get over it. Kinda like making your friend ride a roller coaster when you know she doesn't like it. They get over it and move on, and might even like it.
 

Members online

Top