Captbob, You make references that what type I am using or how I'm using it is wrong. First, I must make one thing clear. I do not use any shock collar or any aversive positive punishment in association with the recall or anything else.
I realize that they probably make better ones these days with more settings, more reliability in that hopefully, they don't malfunction as often.
When you add something to the dog's environment which causes him to stop doing what he's doing it is a positive punishment. I do not believe in using aversive positive punishment to train a dog to come to me. I don't use harsh aversives to train anything. I will use a verbal NRM sometimes.
My feelings about an electric collar are shared by most animal behaviorists and positive method trainers with advanced degrees in animal behavior. There are too many things that can go wrong with using aversives on a dog. So, other methods are used instead for people who understand canine behavior and do not like using aversives on their dog.
Did you or you, Hedwig read the link I put up? Those organizations are full of applied animal behaviorists and trainers. They do NOT agree with using an e collar and are in fact all for the banning of them. This is not based on old, 20 yr. old collars. These people are current and know what they're talking about. There is good reason why NOT to use an e-collar, whether someone wants to believe it or not or make excuses that it is a "stim" or a "correction." All these pretty synonyms for aversive positive punishment in the form of a shock don't change the concept. I don't care if you poked your dog with your finger nail when he didn't come. That is still using avoidance techniques to train a dog. That is not necessary and it can cause a lot of side effects, as I quoted from some very highly regarded and esteemed behaviorists with PhDs in applied animal behavior. To follow my post with their quotes by saying I don't know what "I'm" or.....they're talking about is ludicrous. To me, training a dog by force or avoidance as the main tool of choice is bordering on immoral. What right do we have as another species to coerce an animal into doing our will? Especially, when there are other ways?
My Doberman has a very high prey drive...there is sighthound in his make-up, for goodness sake. He can be running after deer and come when called when in mid chase. The same goes for squirrels, although I let him chase squirrels, but chasing deer is a big, giant no no. So, I conditioned him to come with these distractions. You don't wait until your dog is already being reinforced by chasing the animals or whatever he is interested in. There is a method. (too long to describe here Hedwig, but you can find in other places. I'll help you locate if you wish)
I use to use squirrels for part of my training. I'd let him alert to the squirrel, ask him to come and then turn him loose after he came and sat first. He learned through conditioning and repitition that he would get to chase the squirrels after he came first. That was one of the things I did. It didn't happen in 10 minutes. It took longer. It was a process. He also has chased dogs who wandered into my pasture and I hollered out from about 300ft away to down. He dropped and waited for me. These things were taught with motivation and reward methods, baby steps and enough time to proof each baby step. I am never in a big rush to train my dogs anything. I rely on my dog's trust in me and our relationship. Without explicit trust and never one iota of a worry about what might happen to him next, he is sooooo much more willing to work with me. I do not use force or harsh aversives of any kind and I have a dog who comes when called because it's always worked for him. When he regresses at times a little bit, it's because I have slacked off in reinforcing him or working to spruce up his training. All behavior can regress when the dog never gets reinforced. Would you rather depend on reinforcing with something good that the dog works for....... or reinforcing with something the dog works to avoid?
Do I take him out along side a busy road off leash? Heck no! Dogs are animals and there is always a chance for error. I am not willing to risk his life. I do not put him into situations where his life could be at risk whether on or off leash. I wouldn't no matter how well he was trained. That's just stupid.
I realize that they probably make better ones these days with more settings, more reliability in that hopefully, they don't malfunction as often.
When you add something to the dog's environment which causes him to stop doing what he's doing it is a positive punishment. I do not believe in using aversive positive punishment to train a dog to come to me. I don't use harsh aversives to train anything. I will use a verbal NRM sometimes.
My feelings about an electric collar are shared by most animal behaviorists and positive method trainers with advanced degrees in animal behavior. There are too many things that can go wrong with using aversives on a dog. So, other methods are used instead for people who understand canine behavior and do not like using aversives on their dog.
Did you or you, Hedwig read the link I put up? Those organizations are full of applied animal behaviorists and trainers. They do NOT agree with using an e collar and are in fact all for the banning of them. This is not based on old, 20 yr. old collars. These people are current and know what they're talking about. There is good reason why NOT to use an e-collar, whether someone wants to believe it or not or make excuses that it is a "stim" or a "correction." All these pretty synonyms for aversive positive punishment in the form of a shock don't change the concept. I don't care if you poked your dog with your finger nail when he didn't come. That is still using avoidance techniques to train a dog. That is not necessary and it can cause a lot of side effects, as I quoted from some very highly regarded and esteemed behaviorists with PhDs in applied animal behavior. To follow my post with their quotes by saying I don't know what "I'm" or.....they're talking about is ludicrous. To me, training a dog by force or avoidance as the main tool of choice is bordering on immoral. What right do we have as another species to coerce an animal into doing our will? Especially, when there are other ways?
My Doberman has a very high prey drive...there is sighthound in his make-up, for goodness sake. He can be running after deer and come when called when in mid chase. The same goes for squirrels, although I let him chase squirrels, but chasing deer is a big, giant no no. So, I conditioned him to come with these distractions. You don't wait until your dog is already being reinforced by chasing the animals or whatever he is interested in. There is a method. (too long to describe here Hedwig, but you can find in other places. I'll help you locate if you wish)
I use to use squirrels for part of my training. I'd let him alert to the squirrel, ask him to come and then turn him loose after he came and sat first. He learned through conditioning and repitition that he would get to chase the squirrels after he came first. That was one of the things I did. It didn't happen in 10 minutes. It took longer. It was a process. He also has chased dogs who wandered into my pasture and I hollered out from about 300ft away to down. He dropped and waited for me. These things were taught with motivation and reward methods, baby steps and enough time to proof each baby step. I am never in a big rush to train my dogs anything. I rely on my dog's trust in me and our relationship. Without explicit trust and never one iota of a worry about what might happen to him next, he is sooooo much more willing to work with me. I do not use force or harsh aversives of any kind and I have a dog who comes when called because it's always worked for him. When he regresses at times a little bit, it's because I have slacked off in reinforcing him or working to spruce up his training. All behavior can regress when the dog never gets reinforced. Would you rather depend on reinforcing with something good that the dog works for....... or reinforcing with something the dog works to avoid?
Do I take him out along side a busy road off leash? Heck no! Dogs are animals and there is always a chance for error. I am not willing to risk his life. I do not put him into situations where his life could be at risk whether on or off leash. I wouldn't no matter how well he was trained. That's just stupid.
Last edited: