Doberkim, true what you say re 'statistical significance' - doesn't necessarily mean 'practical significance'...or it might, depending!! I haven't gone back to the original studies to assess that myself.
(i.e. I know what you mean, but not sure how to explain it in brief for others. e.g. A 0.5% difference can be 's.s'. but not 'p.s.' ... and "5 x negligible" is very different from "5 x something" in terms of the 'p.s.' of "5 x" to decision-making! etc.)
Still, the essential point is that it's not absolute that early spay is a good thing, and might be the opposite. Personally I wouldn't want to stop my fur-sons and fur-daughters from maturing, so waiting until 7-14 months seems to me like an appropriately cautious middle ground.
Del.