Victoria Stillwell or Cesar Millan?

Victoria Stillwell or Cesar Millan?


  • Total voters
    67
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
2,434
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Oregon
#41
VS is hotter. Plus positive training is good.

But I wonder if Ceasar is right, that about 90% of these problems could be solved by exercising their dogs.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
#43
What an AZZ. Maybe I missed something BUT why did he bop that dog on the nose?
Because he's got a little weiner? Just a guess because there was no other reason, excuse, justification for such horrible treatment.

He's so clueless and the public pays for this kind of nonsense.
 

Maxy24

Active Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
8,070
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
32
Location
Massachusetts
#44
I do teach my dogs how to unwrap themselves from trees and poles, which is what I think he was doing, but I don't do it in such a frenzied and hectic way. I actually teach it.
Actually I believe his goal is to make the dog follow him...:(
 

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#45
Victoria stillwell.her methods are simple, easy, and safe for both dog and human. sure.. the show is a bit silly sometimes but w/e still lots of good info
nobody gets hurt using a clicker

alpha rolling and "biting" on the other hand is a great way for a non professional to get bit by a dog
 

PWCorgi

Priscilla Winifred Corgi
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
14,854
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
Twin Citay!
#46
I vote Judge Judy for President! Or God.

(And no, I didn't read the thread. Cesar is a douche, the end. :D)
 

Toller_08

Active Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
8,359
Likes
1
Points
36
#49
Could be but with the way he kept aiming for trees and setting the dog up to get wrapped makes me think that was the point of it.
No, Brad's whole idea with the tree thing is to get the dog to "respect" and pay attention to him and his movements. His goal in doing so is that someday the dog will follow him instead of getting wrapped up in the tree. He's a terrible "trainer", and to make matters worse, his people skills are horrendous. It makes no sense to me why anyone would take one of his classes.
 

Paige

Let it be
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
7,359
Likes
0
Points
0
#50
Brad - idiot
Caesar - dumb
The other one - im indifferent

Not even worth full responses.
 

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#51
How is allowing a fight between APBT to happen and then putting it on the show a good thing for the breed. I would bet money that that clip will be used by pro BSL people...
gah. the last time i went to get my teeth cleaned, my hygienist who is a nice, casual pet dog owner who knows i have pit bulls and is mildly dumbfounded by that told me about how her daughter (who is 8) saw that by accident and was horribly traumatized. she went on and on about that show and pit bulls etc for a good 15 minutes while i was an extremely captive audience. yeah. great things for the pit bull.
 

puppydog

Tru evil has no pantyline
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
7,500
Likes
0
Points
0
#52
If some idiotic, balding, Napolean syndromed asshat had to hit my dog there would be a full on smack down, right there, right in the middle of the park. I would probably have him eating through a straw for 6 months!
 

ACooper

Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
27,772
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
IN
#53
I think the reason CM does so well is because he has that "BAM" factor. He can "cure" DA in 30 minutes you know.
Thats why he is so popular, in the society we have now of "I want this NOW" attitudes, this approach offers a quick fix for even serious behaviour problems.

Noone is interested in watching a dog slowly progress over 3 or 6 months to the point where it can walk calmly past other dogs. Thats not going to be very exciting for the viewer. But watching a dog go from crazed, frothing at the mouth to "calm submissive" in under 30 minutes gets peoples attention. He gets results fast for the show, whether or not they last, and how affected the dog is because of this technique isn't brought into it.

CM is excellent at what he does, except what he does is intimidate dogs and shut them down.
Excellent post Mroses, and I agree completely. That is exactly the reason Cesar has an audience, followers, and a show at all.

It's the old "union" adage..........."You want it done right, or RIGHT NOW?" And most people will pick RIGHT NOW.

VS is hotter. Plus positive training is good.

But I wonder if Ceasar is right, that about 90% of these problems could be solved by exercising their dogs.
90% is a high percentage, but I can actually agree that a WHOLE BUNCH OF ISSUES can be dealt with by giving the dog enough exercise and mental stimulation. Which mental stimulation is something I never really hear him talk about :confused:

VS is definitely the better schooled, more informed, and would have my trust with my own animals faster than the other idiot.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
4,381
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Midwest
#54
I put CM because I'd rather be around him, we could talk about things other than dog training, than VS. She seems like a person I wouldn't like to spend too much time with. As far as which one I'd like to train my dogs, neither.
 

FoxyWench

Salty Sea Dog
Joined
Feb 14, 2006
Messages
7,308
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Connecticut
#55
i think vs plays a CHARACTER on tv, ive met her in person before tv came along and shes a VERY nice person, very personable, she oozes confidnece but not pushyness and its easy to hold a general conversation with her.
I think the producers wanted to play the strong british woman thing and shes simply playing a part...

i like many of her training methods, they are easy methods that the average person can follow with little to no risk to their dogs mental stability.
and she did try and clear up in an interveiw (which ill have to try and refind it was a og time ago) that she doesnt HATE dogs in the bed, but when the dog in the bed is causing issues between yourself an dyour partner or the dog is bed uarding ect the bed is the last place you want them.

she also does encorage more excersize, but unlike CM she doesnt push EXCESSIVE excersize.
from what ive seen of her show she encorages both onleash and of leash excersize (in SAFE places) to suit each individual dog rather than "well you need to walk that og at least 2 hours...doesnt matter that the dog is 16 and has hip an dknee problems, its obviously not excersized and neds to walk for 2 hours at a pace that makes the dog hurt...

i think milans producers have managed to find a better nich interms of the character portrayal, he appeals to the average "i want it now" american who doesnt want to hear that it will take time and repititan to retrain these dogs, they see it happen in 30 mins and that makes them happy...
his methods however are barbaric and none of it based on ACTUAL behavioural training, he simply shuts dogs down, makes them so fraid of screwing up they just wont try anything...or so confused and angry they simply redirect/bite.
he also comes acros as a know it all and fro the episodes ive seen VERY sexist.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#56
Good post Foxy and good points. I hate how he comes across as an expert or that the producers, in the intro part of the show label him an expert. He is sooooooo not an expert. He is barbaric and archaic, doesn't know behavior, misreads body language and misinterepts the intentions of dogs to the hilt.

I have seen her recommend dogs not being in bed but in every case that I saw, it was dogs that had resource guarding issues and in those cases, they should not get to "own" the bed until the issues are resolved. I never got a feeling that she meant that dogs shouldn't be in bed at all.
 

Sweet72947

Squishy face
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
9,159
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Northern Virginia
#57
90% is a high percentage, but I can actually agree that a WHOLE BUNCH OF ISSUES can be dealt with by giving the dog enough exercise and mental stimulation. Which mental stimulation is something I never really hear him talk about :confused:
Actually, on one episode or other a long time ago, he said something about walks being exercise for the body and the brain, but that's as far as I've ever heard him talk about mental stimulation.

I voted for VS.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#58
He doesn't talk about mental stimulation because he clearly doesn't want them stimulated. They might get ideas of their own God forbid!:eek: He just wants enough exercise that they're exhausted and easier to dominate.
 

Maxy24

Active Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
8,070
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
32
Location
Massachusetts
#59
The types of walks HE gives are not mentally stimulating. The dogs can't sniff and I've seen episodes where he hurts the dog for looking at another dog. The dog has to keep it's head down and walk at a slow pace (for a dog) by his side without so much as sniffing for a potty spot or else he gets attacked by Cesar, no mental stimulation whatsoever.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top