Ugh I hate HATE this argument. Someone getting a dog from a breeder isn't putting puppies in body bags. People surrendering puppies to rescues is putting puppies in body bags.
I think you are reading into what picklepaige is saying. I don't think she's saying getting a breeder dog is killing a shelter dog (especially considering she wants breeder dogs in the future)
There are a lot of people that don't look at rescue and shelter dogs because of misconceptions- this idea that you can't find a nice, cute dog in shelters. they are all 'broken' or 'messed up'.
She's saying that not getting a shelter dog is putting puppies in body bags in a thread about whether people have guilt over buying breeder dogs?
I don't follow your question.
I do feel like dog people sometimes... justify things? so they don't feel bad?
For the record, I have two breeder dogs. I don't have guilt over that. I could have gotten a Chihuahua from the shelter I worked at at that time. I didn't. Why? I wanted a papillon. Right or wrong, I did. I love my papillons. I'm glad I got them.
But on the other hand dogs in shelters do need people to buy/adopt/rescue them. If everyone thinks they're broken and no one is adopting them then yeah there's less dogs going into homes.
I mean... people do need to adopt the shelter dogs though or where else will they go? That's really all I'm trying to say.
And that's honestly a mindset I have a problem with. What needs to happen is less dogs go INTO shelters instead of guilting people into taking dogs OUT of shelters.
There are some great programs being instituted in shelters in various places in the US that are reducing surrender rates by doing things like requiring appointments for surrender and offering free behavior/training counseling at that appointment. Keeping dogs in homes is what keeps dogs out of shelters in the first place.
Do I think doing your research and getting a dog from a good breeder who is going to take care to be knowledgable about where their puppies are going and make sure they are taken care of for life is contributing to the death of shelter dogs? No. Not at all. Especially not if you're looking for a very specific, niche puppy that you KNOW you can't easily or feasibly find in a shelter.
But I think people who decide they want a pet dog and go out and buy a pet only popular breed, even if the breeder is "good" in that they health test and such....yeah, 60+ dogs just got put down in my county TODAY, and I guarantee at least 10 of them could have provided for your family what that breeder dog did. And chances are, that breeder sold 5 or 8 or 10 puppies to similar families. So yeah, I do think if more people adopted instead of purchased dogs, yes, less dogs would be going into body bags. And honestly, if you're purchasing a dog to be nothing more than a pet and there's no reason you need a specific breed other than "they're a good family dog"...yeah, I do think you're contributing to the high rates of euthanasia....
And that's honestly a mindset I have a problem with. What needs to happen is less dogs go INTO shelters instead of guilting people into taking dogs OUT of shelters.
There are some great programs being instituted in shelters in various places in the US that are reducing surrender rates by doing things like requiring appointments for surrender and offering free behavior/training counseling at that appointment. Keeping dogs in homes is what keeps dogs out of shelters in the first place.
This is it, for me.
I have a rescue dog so it's not that I'm anti-rescue but I have visited countries with less of a problem than we do in the States and it's not because they have a higher preponderance of people who adopt than buy - if anything the culture was more "get a good breeder dog, socialize and exercise the ever living hell out of it." More dogs stayed in homes. That was just my impression though, but it's stuck with me.
Because of that I do not think, if I'm being brutally cynical about it, that me adopting Astro did anything to cure anything except in the most immediate of senses. It was still a good thing, it gave my precious wonderful lunatic a chance and it opened a spot for another dog to take his kennel space, but it did nothing to address why that kennel space keeps getting filled as far as I can tell. So it helped but I'm pretty pessimistic about how much it helped, I guess?
I would love to see numbers about lots of aspects of this topic, because individual perception definitely affects all of us and it becomes so personal, and understandably so.
Ugh I hate HATE this argument. Someone getting a dog from a breeder isn't putting puppies in body bags. People surrendering puppies to rescues is putting puppies in body bags.
Of my current dogs, two came from rescues and two were purchased - one bred intentionally, one an oops litter.
The two that I purchased didn't put any puppies in body bags. When I got Pip and then again when I got Maisy, I wanted *A* dog. And I found two great dogs I adore at rescue groups.
I wanted Squash, I wanted Toast. At the time each joined my household, I didn't want *A* dog - I wanted *THESE* dogs. If I hadn't gotten Squash, if I hadn't gotten Toast, I wouldn't have gotten any dogs at all at those times and I'd still have just two.
I think it's regional. Around here there is definitely a strong bias towards rescue dogs with the general public unless someone does a specific task - hunting being common in my area. The only people I know who think rescues are "broken" are people who have gotten dogs who really WERE broken and adopted out anyway with no disclosure - which is another whole can of worms.