This is obviously a problem with semantics. I do thank the people who gave me advice, and I apologize for not doing so previously. I was however trying to explain the misunderstanding as quoted below:
“will note that calling her an investment does strike me as odd...
And a class action lawsuit for what... because your dog is getting a rash
Though to most people here calling your dog an investment isn't going to go over well. Yes a good foundation bitch IS an investment.. but its an investment of more than just money.
Also, the mention of a law-suit makes it harder for us to take you seriouslyâ€
I therefore saw the need to explain that I was referring to 2 different topics, not suing someone because of a diaper rash, for pete’s sake. And also defending my use of the term “investment†which was legitimate and correct usage, especially when I was thinking of creating a case against the State. Correct terminology in court is vital.
noun
1. the act of investing; laying out money or capital in an enterprise with the expectation of profit [syn: investing]
2. money that is invested with an expectation of profit
3. the commitment of something other than money (time, energy, or effort) to a project with the expectation of some worthwhile result; "this job calls for the investment of some hard thinking"; "he made an emotional investment in the work"
4. outer layer or covering of an organ or part or organism
5. the act of putting on robes or vestments
6. the ceremonial act of clothing someone in the insignia of an office; the formal promotion of a person to an office or rank
I note, however, that the use of the term “investment†on this board is a bad word. I forget that other people have different prejudices.
I was surprised, especially after nursing my other dog (that I made the mistake of buying from a store) through lymphoma until he died at 5 years old, which broke my heart. So when I bought another dog, it was more expensive due to the breed, and done after extensive research. I was not trying to insult any one else.
The mention of the cost was in reference to the State of CA SB 250. Part of my purpose was, as I stated, in thought of a law suite.
I will not, however, make the mistake of using the word again, as it apparently creates enmity. As per:
“But the part I did understand is that your investment is much more important because it is paraded around a ring. Your the kind of person who give show people a bad name.
Lots of people on here show their dogs or compete with their dogs in some other arena... I have never heard any of them refer to their dog like a gold nugget nor have I heard them make their "investment" sound so much better than some lowly "pet". You could learn a thing or two from these people.
Those of us who do show, trial, etc likely don't appreciate the attitude. Your questions got answered. Instead of replying you had a fit. Would you like a hero cookie “
Of course, regarding fits, that was not my intention, but you may intrepert it however you choose. Thanks.
Therefore I do apologize for using the word investment and will note that it is forbidden to use on this board. Thank you for the education in semantics and in board conversation per se.
