Correctional Training

Brattina88

Active Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
12,958
Likes
6
Points
38
Location
OH
Stags, from an "outsider's" p.o.v on this topic (because some people have made me weary of adding my two cents) its seems as though you have something personally against some of them ... you keep quoting jokes between each other as if they pertain to you :confused: Or ar you just mad that their answer for everything doesn't involve 'correcting' a dog?

You keep saying, over and over, that they don't get "it" and they never will. Care to share what "it" is? Because I'm starting to wonder if you even do :)

Blah Blah blah blah. Hug a tree yet today?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
Brattina88 said:
Stags, from an "outsider's" p.o.v on this topic (because some people have made me weary of adding my two cents) its seems as though you have something personally against some of them ... you keep quoting jokes between each other as if they pertain to you :confused: Or ar you just mad that their answer for everything doesn't involve 'correcting' a dog?

You keep saying, over and over, that they don't get "it" and they never will. Care to share what "it" is? Because I'm starting to wonder if you even do :)
It gets even better in my PM...don't know what his/her problem is?:mad:
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
1,106
Likes
0
Points
0
dr2little said:
It gets even better in my PM...don't know what his/her problem is?:mad:
Doc..........I love a Tree hugger (((HUGS))) :D
Just block him/her/it..........they are not worth your time!!!!
 
S

stags14

Guest
dr2little said:
It gets even better in my PM...don't know what his/her problem is?:mad:
So doc - you used to train using corrections... From your list of credentials and your years of service you probably trainined many dogs that way.

I would expect that you have issued written apologies along with monetary refunds to all of the dog owners that you trained so inhumanely. Is that the case? If not - how come?
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
1,106
Likes
0
Points
0
stags14 said:
So doc - you used to train using corrections... From your list of credentials and your years of service you probably trainined many dogs that way.

I would expect that you have issued written apologies along with monetary refunds to all of the dog owners that you trained so inhumanely. Is that the case? If not - how come?
Blah blah blah...........she can't hear you, give it up!!
 

doberkim

Naturally Natural
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
1,380
Likes
0
Points
0
stags, why dont you get off the computer and go find a local trainer and train the dog - clearly you wont find the help you want or will be happy with, on the internet. if this thread makes you so angry about things that you feel you need to insult people, why continue posting in it?
 

IliamnasQuest

Loves off-leash training!
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
1,083
Likes
0
Points
0
stags14 said:
Give me a break. Dr and Dober (the tree huggers) do not get it - they never will... The positive only gang has humanized their dogs.

Police dogs.... dogs that must obey commands in life and death situations are not trained using positive only.
You have definite blinders on, I'm afraid. Where in the heck did this "tree hugger" concept come from? I'm far from a tree hugger and I use nearly all positives in my training. You sound like a petulant child when you resort to attempted insults like that. Why SHOULD anyone give you a break? *L*

I don't see them humanizing their dogs nearly as much as others do. In fact, they are quite honest that their dogs ARE dogs and NEED to be dogs. What they do say is that we need to think like dogs because dogs can't think like humans. They can't understand an improperly used correction - and if you aren't dead-on in your timing, you can easily mess up a dog with corrections.

It's part of human nature to correct and because of that, corrections do happen in nearly all dog/human relationships. So some of us promote the other side of it in hopes that people will try to use LESS correction and more positives in their training. It works wonders for the dog, honestly.

stags14 said:
So what would you precsribe for me and my 7 month old rescue. If I keep her on a short leash in the house, and the leash is always in my hand, what exactly do I do when she sticks her nose somewhere that I don't want it? (edge of kitchen table, top of coffee table, top of furniture, etc... etc... etc...). What do I do?
Well, first of all you need to teach her (TEACH, not PUNISH) that there is another behavior you would prefer. When she starts to put her nose somewhere you don't want, you re-direct that behavior .. maybe you ask for a sit and reward that, or say "here" in a happy voice and bring her away from that spot. Don't keep tempting things in places you don't want this dog while you're training her. That's a HUMAN problem (and I know, you'll say "but the kids might leave something out" .. well, train your KIDS too .. *L*).

You can also teach "leave it" which to my dogs means "stop what you're doing, go to me and get a treat or petting". It's a great behavior and easily taught to the dog.

As you reward an alternate behavior, she'll start to learn that the alternate behavior gets her what she wants and she'll start offering that behavior more than the one you don't want. Remember, a behavior continues to happen because it's rewarded. If there's no reward for sticking her nose in those areas, there's really no reason for her to continue to do so.

This would be the first step. If, down the line and after weeks of kind and consistent training, you feel the need to throw in an "eht!" when she puts her nose on the counter then I could understand that. But starting off with a correction wouldn't be the right thing to do.

Physically correcting the dog for simply doing something very normal (putting her nose up to sniff an area) would be like slapping your child's hand for reaching for something .. I'm not humanizing, I'm putting this into terms that may be more understandable. With a child, you can verbally explain why you don't want them to do something and offer some other activity. With a dog, the explanation has to be in dog language, which is why we set up an alternate behavior that we reinforce.

Good trainers understand how to "explain" things to animals. It's not anthropomorphizing, it's understanding behavior and how it relates to learning in our dogs. There's certainly NOTHING wrong with that and the fact that you choose to mock it concerns me a bit. Why would you mock something that works so well for so many people and definitely works well for so many dogs?

Don't bother to answer unless you really feel you want to take the time .. *L* .. I'm heading out in about an hour to go to obedience trials with my dogs so I won't be by the computer for several days. I have three entered - one is a rescue dog (chow) who has already earned her novice agility titles and is now showing in obedience. You can do all sorts of successful things with rescue dogs if you want to put in the time. It takes persistence, consistency, kindness and understanding. I rarely use corrections on this girl and she just wiggles all over when we do things together. And she was a brat when I got her! *L*

Have a good weekend, everyone!

Melanie and the gang in Alaska
BTW: Doberluv and Dr2little .. c'mon up! It's cool up here!
 
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
891
Likes
0
Points
0
Doberluv said:
Well, I don't train using collar corrections. I train dogs with the use of motivation and reward and don't use any aversives (collar yanks, scoldings, anger, scruffs, no pain or discomfort, no fear, no intimidation) when training obedience or agility or tricks.
No sh!t, Doberluv, me too!!:D I dont TRAIN with aversives, and anyone who does TRAIN with aversives dont know what they are doing. You never TEACH something new with corrections. All my TRAINING is done off leash while TEACHING new exercises. THEY (the dogs) CHOOSE when they want to LEARN something new, THEY come to me, to learn with praise and treats. THEN when they FULLY understand the exercise THEN I introduce corrections when they do not comply.
 

tempura tantrum

Shiba Inu Slave
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
768
Likes
2
Points
0
Location
pacific northwest
Geez Stags...chill out a bit.

Even if you have good, pertinent information in your posts, it's hard to see through all the personal insults you keep throwing at the "tree huggers."

It's a common fallacy in arguments to resort to personal attacks when you don't know how to truly argue the point.

Don't distract from the debate at hand.

Keep it on topic.

If you can't figure out how to debate WITHOUT resorting to petty insults, simply quit.

And as far as "humanizing" a dog...you do realize that corrections/punishment (as humans give them), are a primate response, NOT a canine one? I spoke once before about generalization. Only the most highly developed primates can generalize. Dogs cannot. What you think *seems* like a good approximation of a canid correction may TOTALLY miss the mark in the dog's mind. They cannot generalize across species. So when you correct your dog, YOU in effect, are anthropomorphizing your dog.

And as far as anthropomorphization goes- EVERYONE does it. It's part of being human.
 

stevinski

Int CH - $uperBitch
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
2,062
Likes
0
Points
0
Blah Blah blah blah. Hug a tree yet today?
OMG i dnt no who the he!! you think you are!!!

you've only just joined this forum so let me give you a piece of information dear,
We have rules on this forum!!! we try to create a nice, kind, helpful atmosphere where people feel free to express their own opinions.
you've just come on here and started having a go at one of our most loved members,

all i can say is tht if you decide to stick around,
you better change your attitude towards people and stop getting so **** aggressive
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
891
Likes
0
Points
0
tempura tantrum said:
They cannot generalize across species.
EXACTLY!!!! Doberluv spoke of HUMAN to dog relationships DIFFER from DOG to DOG relationships. If they cannot generalize then Doberluv's statement how we relate to dogs is different than a dog to dog is FALSE.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
This is what I'm talking about.
http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/ailab/people/wantia/JC/Hare_Tomasello.pdf
http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/030374.html

In many ways humans and dogs, having evolved together during the domestic process understand a lot of things about eachother that were formerly not realized. There has been a lot of more recent research.

That is not to say that they or we understand everything about eachother. You can't take one thing and make a blatant over exaggeration. There are bits and pieces to the puzzle. There are certain interesting factors or points where dogs are quite amazing in the studies they've done and some points where of course, we don't speak the same language.

I am not here to argue and nit pick. If you're interested in some research which I find fascinating regarding the differences between domestic dogs and other animals and how they relate to us...some of the ways, you might like those links. If I made a statement which was not explanatory enough, I'm sorry. If I made the statement in a way which was too easily misinterpreted, I'm also sorry.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,341
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Texas
whatszmatter said:
You still didn't answer the question posed to you. What would you do with a year or two year old rescue, how about a 3 year old that had many sucesses at counter surfing, if you had kids that would surely leave something out at some point, leaving a big pay off that can reinforce even more strongly the action of counter surfing because of the unscheduled pay off. You know about this stuff you've read all the science and Phd's, you know how powerful it is, so tell us, what would you do in THAT situation, not your almost perfect one.

Baby gate the kitchen, and crate the dog when you can't watch him.
 
W

whatszmatter

Guest
OutlineACDs said:
Baby gate the kitchen, and crate the dog when you can't watch him.
ummm, that's not really training, its called as Dober will surely understand and to quote a line from karen pryor, "shooting the animal", but its hardly training.

but just to play along, let's say the dog now learned to jump the baby gate?? Gotta dog with enough motivation to get the food, he'll do it, I've seen plenty of dogs scale and 8-9 foot wall, a baby gate is nothing.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
Preventing a dog from getting a payoff is part of training....giving an alternative, incompatable behavior which has a greater reinforcement than the unwanted behavior...in other words showing the dog that not jumping up on the counter is more profitable than jumping up on the counter. It doesn't matter what age the dog is or if he has been reinforced for the unwanted behavior before. Behaviors can be elimintated by not being reinforced for a time.

Lots of people train older dogs with bad habits by using clicker training concepts. In fact, I don't have a dog younger than 3 and some bad habits have snuck in there over time by my carelessness or laziness. I've had to un-do behaviors which had been reinforced which I didn't like by getting in there and working the problem. It doesn't take compulsive training methods to train a dog.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
Originally Posted by whatszmatter
You still didn't answer the question posed to you. What would you do with a year or two year old rescue, how about a 3 year old that had many sucesses at counter surfing, if you had kids that would surely leave something out at some point, leaving a big pay off that can reinforce even more strongly the action of counter surfing because of the unscheduled pay off. You know about this stuff you've read all the science and Phd's, you know how powerful it is, so tell us, what would you do in THAT situation, not your almost perfect one.
Well, just from a practical viewpoint, what I did was "mine" the counter with habaneros and also rubbed the counter with the peppers so that just touching it was unpleasant. It worked perfectly for Kharma. Not so good for Shiva . . . she ate the peppers - and liked them :rolleyes:
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top