cliffdog
New Member
Okay, this is a real bummer of a subject, but I was thinking about it, and I thought it might make an interesting thread... something to think about.
I've got a slightly-more-than-casual interest in survivalism and I'm beginning to put together a bug-out bag (BOB). Basically it's just a bag with simple survival items in case I need to escape from home in case of an emergency. A humorous and unrealistic example people often bring up is zombie apocalypse. A more realistic example is a need to escape from local riots, terror attacks, etc. Not likely, but it can serve as something very handy in practical situations, such as if your car breaks down or if you get lost while hiking.
Anyway, I was thinking... if I was in a serious scenario when I had to "bug out" (escape from the immediate region, possibly even into the wilderness), it would be impractical to believe I could keep myself and multiple dogs alive. One dog would be an inconvenience and the more you add on to that the less practical it gets.
Without using a cop-out answer ("I would just stay and die rather than leave my dogs" or "I would take them even if it lessened my chances of survival"), if you were in a situation where you could only save yourself and one of your dogs, which of your dogs would you choose? Would it be a purely emotional decision (your favorite) or would you pick the dog that would be the most practical choice such as if you have a dog that is smaller and won't need as much food or a dog that can hunt or is less susceptible to weather-related issues?
I've got a slightly-more-than-casual interest in survivalism and I'm beginning to put together a bug-out bag (BOB). Basically it's just a bag with simple survival items in case I need to escape from home in case of an emergency. A humorous and unrealistic example people often bring up is zombie apocalypse. A more realistic example is a need to escape from local riots, terror attacks, etc. Not likely, but it can serve as something very handy in practical situations, such as if your car breaks down or if you get lost while hiking.
Anyway, I was thinking... if I was in a serious scenario when I had to "bug out" (escape from the immediate region, possibly even into the wilderness), it would be impractical to believe I could keep myself and multiple dogs alive. One dog would be an inconvenience and the more you add on to that the less practical it gets.
Without using a cop-out answer ("I would just stay and die rather than leave my dogs" or "I would take them even if it lessened my chances of survival"), if you were in a situation where you could only save yourself and one of your dogs, which of your dogs would you choose? Would it be a purely emotional decision (your favorite) or would you pick the dog that would be the most practical choice such as if you have a dog that is smaller and won't need as much food or a dog that can hunt or is less susceptible to weather-related issues?