Now how do you do that with only positive techniques?
>> "Positive only techniques" isn't a term I've ever used. It's actually the one I most often hear J&P trainers use who are trying to discredit positive methods. When I catch my untrained dog in the act of peeing/pooping in my house, I RUN towards them yelling AAAAAAAAAH! It isn't intended to scold them as in BAD DOG! It comes out sounding as it would if I was trying to warn someone of impending danger or who was about to put a fork in a light socket or something. Then I scoop the dog up run them outside and hope that they can go there so I can reward that.
I don't think my dogs have a clue what or why I do that, maybe they think "wow, mom's crazy." or maybe they think " gee by her reaction maybe it's not SAFE to pee in the house " I don't know what they think. I think the first time I did it with Rosie she started smiling and wiggling like she thought I was coming to play a game. Sammy was more worried about it. I have an ultra soft approach with him with everything. I'm not sure if that's not positive enough for you or for anyone else. My dog needs to know peeing in the house isn't the right thing to do. I don't need to scold, hit, choke or otherwise hurt the dog but I do need to get the message across somehow.
I actually don't mind having littermates. It really isn't as awful. At least yet. What you do for one you do for the other. I imagine it's like twins.
>>twins is my worst nightmare LOL
Certainly I am frustrated; I'd like them to respond the way I've been told they would. I want to know what I'm doing wrong and whether I'm expecting appropriate things of them. I think, after this, that I am. Ian Dunbar can stuff it. I'm just going to have to work at their own pace and not worry about making this or that deadline.
I think learning to use a new training method just by reading is really tough. It's a science but also an art. There is alot to knowing how to implement the methods.
FWIW I walk reguarly with an ER doc. He was very impressed with Rosie and Sammy and "how well they listen." How fast and reliable their recall, how they retrieve to my hand etc. He asked lots of questions about the methods "how I got them to do that" and I showed him some things with the clicker, answered his questions etc. He's a SMART guy and he works really hard with his lovely young Golden but he inadvertently taught his dog to lie down and instantly pop back up because he clicked for the down but fed when the dog had come back to a sit. I hadn't told him to "click for the actiuon. Feed for/in position" I guess. As soon as he started clicking and feeding in position the dog stopped popping up out of his down. There were several other things he inadvertently trained that we fixed. Point is-the dog wasn't "bad" or stupid, it was a training problem. The trainer isn't stupid either, neither was the method - he just didn't know enough to see what he was teaching the dog / why the dog was doing what he was doing. I can give you plenty of examples of stuff I've inadvertently clicker trained in my own dogs like Rosie's flying finish where she body slams me. I intended to shape her with the clicker to get straigher, but in getting straighter she was getting bigger and bigger movements that ended up with her going from front to finish by flying through the air and slamming into me. The flying finish is great-- the body slam - not so much
My dogs are both doing rall level 3. I am well aware of how to teach them all of the exercises but i still train with a group of people. It's very helpful when I run into problems to say "could you watch me? this is what I'm doing, this is what I'm getting" It's amazing how simple it sometimes is for someone who is watching. That's why even Susan Garret (agility superstar) doesn't train in isolation. I'm sure you'll be happier and less frustrated when you have access to 1:1 help and after you've had a chance to read some of those books. Isn't it one more week til the trainer comes back?
bah! I tried to leave your words in quotes and have mine not be but I screwed it up. Oh well. You'll get the idea.