I get irritaed when people proclaim something that is quite obviously wrong; PC = Personal Computer. Nothing about what OS they run, what they look like, etc. Macs are PC's. Windows machines are PC's. The Commodore 64 was a PC.
In this context, you're wrong. the current context is mac vs pc. I thought i was pretty clear earlier in addressing this that you can by various definitions stretch "pc" to mean anything. can we get back to the real issues and stop fussing over nomenclature?
Well, in addition to everything apple doing being proprietary
hardware wise, not software wise. Besides...
http://www.psystar.com/index.php
, windows is the better machine for the exact reasons you just stated: They have to keep in mind that there are others out there, and that there is no possible way that one company could make every type of component out there on par that companies that specialize them can do. So you know what? They didn't try, and they let people pick and choose the components they want to.
Right... so windows gives you an OS which they have no possible way of assuring works well with whatever Frankensteins machine you've cobbled together. And Apple gives you an entire experience, and a good one at that. They give you the whole kit-and-kaboodle in one neat, well tested, pretty, usable, package. I'm glad we agree here.
And with you throwing in some apple marketing, I'll respond to the same: Think Different. Isn't using your own, personalized setup that you picked to exactly suit your needs thinking more differently than using the exact same computer as everyone else? Or perhaps I'm wrong and 'think different' really means to conform to what one company wants your computing experience to be.
Apple does think different. They never said you have to agree with them. Actually I dont think Steve Jobs cares what you think. He's gonna give you his idea of what a good computing experience should be, and you know what? He's onto something. But you're always free to think whatever the heck you want.
Mac is also a random company putting together parts to make a computer you bring home in a box.
They're manufacturing the machines, the core os, and the software. And engineering a clean, reliable experience. They're not choosing inferior products based on whether they can shave off 12 cents per machine.
Also, things do work together, adhering to standards set by industry. Believe it or not, manufacturers are good at what they do.
riiight.
Higher quality? Better programmers care about it? I honestly have no idea how you would come to that conclusion.
In my experience
Reformatting every 3-4 months is only something that needs to be done if you go out and actively try to get a virus. Really, that's insane! I went 6 YEARS without a format, and that's with me being a retarded 13 year old and doing some horrible things as far as security practices go. The only reason you have to 'deal with the computer rather than doing the tasks you bought it to do' is if you have no idea what the hell you're doing.
Obviously I push my machine to much more difficult limits than do most people... However you superimpose your experiences over those that the average person sees...
I'm not saying they're better because I use one. I'm saying they're better because you don't need to spend a fortune to get a machine to check your email, and they have greater functionality.
I used to have that same philosophy... I liked the "freedom" of the pc... But it always nagged at me that the experience should be better... The fact is that for me (and most people who give apple a real go) the entire experience of owning a mac is better than owning a "windows machine"