- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,083
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 0
How common IS this?
On a couple of other forums there have recently been a number of people making excuses for "oops" litters by claiming their dog had a silent heat. While I'm sure that it happens on occasion, I'm just wondering how often it's just a lack of observation. I think most bitches show SOME sign when they're in heat. The signs may be subtle but they're there.
I did a search and found this quote from a veterinarian, which kind of illustrates what I was thinking:
"..many veterinarians who do a lot of reproductive work think that the
most common cause of heats that appear to be skipped is simply that
they were not observed. Some dogs have very subtle signs of estrus.."
He does go on to mention the silent heat too. I'm just wondering about this because I'm seeing a LOT of people using silent heat as an excuse. (On the one forum, the bitch first was bred "accidentally" during a silent heat, the second time because the owners went on vacation and the people taking care of the dogs "accidentally" left them together, and now this poor bitch is on her third heat cycle and pregnant for the third time at the age of 20 months .. and this time it was done deliberately).
So to the breeders out there - how common have you found the silent heat to be? Is it a matter of actually showing zero signs of being in heat, or are the signs just subtle and a person needs to be extremely observant when they have an intact bitch and an intact male?
Neither of the bitches I've had that were intact had silent heats. Dora was very clean and it was easy to not see early symptoms but I still always knew .. and I was always aware of her cycle and when she was likely to be in heat so I was watching for signs.
Melanie and the gang in Alaska
On a couple of other forums there have recently been a number of people making excuses for "oops" litters by claiming their dog had a silent heat. While I'm sure that it happens on occasion, I'm just wondering how often it's just a lack of observation. I think most bitches show SOME sign when they're in heat. The signs may be subtle but they're there.
I did a search and found this quote from a veterinarian, which kind of illustrates what I was thinking:
"..many veterinarians who do a lot of reproductive work think that the
most common cause of heats that appear to be skipped is simply that
they were not observed. Some dogs have very subtle signs of estrus.."
He does go on to mention the silent heat too. I'm just wondering about this because I'm seeing a LOT of people using silent heat as an excuse. (On the one forum, the bitch first was bred "accidentally" during a silent heat, the second time because the owners went on vacation and the people taking care of the dogs "accidentally" left them together, and now this poor bitch is on her third heat cycle and pregnant for the third time at the age of 20 months .. and this time it was done deliberately).
So to the breeders out there - how common have you found the silent heat to be? Is it a matter of actually showing zero signs of being in heat, or are the signs just subtle and a person needs to be extremely observant when they have an intact bitch and an intact male?
Neither of the bitches I've had that were intact had silent heats. Dora was very clean and it was easy to not see early symptoms but I still always knew .. and I was always aware of her cycle and when she was likely to be in heat so I was watching for signs.
Melanie and the gang in Alaska