I don't think Denver cares anymore.

Kimbers

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
337
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Denver
#1
About the bully breed ban, that is.
It's still in effect, but I'm seeing more and more dogs that could be confiscated if the city wanted to. They're all over, too. Seven or eight in my part of the neighborhood, and I saw three downtown today.
Now I'm kind of glad and hoping the ban will be lifted soon, but I'm also a bit worried. The people getting these dogs while the ban is still in effect aren't always the kind who should be getting them. Our next door neighbor, for example, has an APBT who probably could be a nice dog but is barely trained at all, and quite honestly, scares me. These aren't the kind of dogs I would want spreading the image of the breed(s).
That's not to say everyone who owns a "banned dog" is an incompetent owner; I obviously have only met a handful. Just the ones I've seen recently are a bit concerning.
Wish the ban would just be lifted so that good owners can improve the image rather than just the d-bags who are like "woah, tough-looking dog? I should totally get it!" ruining things.
 

JessLough

Love My Mutt
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
13,404
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
33
Location
Guelph, Ontario
#2
I see bully breeds all around here all the time. Going by when BSL came, they should all be like what, at least 8 years old now? Police aren't issuing tickets or anything unless they bring them to an event unmuzzled.

That said, the owners are not helping to remove BSL at all, no matter how well behaved their dog is. The way to get rid of a law is not by ignoring it
 

Teal

...ice road...
Joined
Jun 19, 2011
Messages
1,497
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Northern California
#3
And this is a REALLY good example as to why BSL is crap. Law-abiding citizens who are responsible dog owners follow the law. Idiot wanna-be gangstas who don't care about the law and probably aren't the best dog owners don't care if a breed is banned, and half the time think that makes them more appealing. Except, their version of a "pit bull" is anything big, bulky, and snarling.
 
K

Kaydee

Guest
#4
Then there's the point that makes the whole breed ban concept ridiculous...What is a pit bull really? Alot of us don't have any record or any clue of our dogs family history never mind genetics...
...if Sophie was somehow analyzed down to 25% Staffordshire, 25% Boxer, 10% Beagle and 10% German Shepard and 5% Tabbie cat, is she in fact considered a "Pit Bull" or a mixed breed? Breed bans don't make any sense when you come down to it.
 

crazedACD

Active Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
3,048
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
West Missouri
#6
There aren't breed bans here but I've all of a sudden noticed an upswing in cane corsos and a few other oddball mastiffs from that wannabe gangster type. This scares me on one hand, but on the other will make a really good point it is the owner...not the dog.
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#7
If Denver really doesn't care, it is high time they get rid of the ban entirely. I know a lot of people who aren't going to USDAA Nationals this year because it is being held in Denver, and they either won't give their money to a city with BSL or they have dogs that they worry will get targeted.

I personally think it was an idiotic decision to hold Nationals in a place with BSL, but I suppose that's another thread.
 

OwnedByBCs

Will Creep For Sheep
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
588
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado
#8
Yeah, I love Colorado and I will probably always live here, but I can't deny that I am majorly disappointed in Denver and I feel ashamed of that law. I would have expected better from such a supposedly dog friendly state.

I think its just a matter of time. I read somewhere that the breed ban is costing them almost $300,000 a year to enforce.
 

Kimbers

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
337
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Denver
#9
I personally think it was an idiotic decision to hold Nationals in a place with BSL, but I suppose that's another thread.
Yeah, I was wondering if people just didn't think of the ban or what was going on there.



I do think the ban will be lifted sooner than later. I was reading an article in the Denver Post about how "pit bulls" can be any of dozens of breeds, so drawing the line gets a bit hard.
Really, we're just now realizing this? I have to wonder what the people were thinking when they decided to ban pit bulls. I mean, the form for getting a dog license literally says something like "licensing a pit bull or pit bull mix is illegal and the license will be voided." I've never heard of this "pit bull" dog. Is it like an APBT? Pray tell, what do they look like? Anyway, it doesn't concern me or any of the APBT, corso, or bull dog owners I know. I mean, we don't own one. //sarcasm
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
#10
Denver = Dauchau for dogs. I will never, ever forget those photos of piles of slaughtered pitbulls from Denver's enforcement. Ever. Or forgive.

And this is a REALLY good example as to why BSL is crap. Law-abiding citizens who are responsible dog owners follow the law. Idiot wanna-be gangstas who don't care about the law and probably aren't the best dog owners don't care if a breed is banned, and half the time think that makes them more appealing. Except, their version of a "pit bull" is anything big, bulky, and snarling.
Exactly. BSL is nothing more than a tool to make shoeple think their overlords are "protecting" them.

The way to overturn laws like this is for those who live under them to DEMAND they be removed from the books.
 

Cheza

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
1,278
Likes
0
Points
0
#12
I live in the metro area, just north of the Denver proper. My city doesn't have a breed ban, nor do most of the others in the area. Just Denver/Denver county and the City of Aurora which is a metro bedroom to the southeast. Interestingly enough Aurora enacted it to prevent shelter overflow from Denver's ban all those many years ago. The shelter I volunteer at is 90% Amstaff/Pitty for pretty much the same reason, although I'm glad to see they tend to get adopted out quickly.

I hate the ban and I'm against it; an English assignment I did last semester was a proposal from the citizens of Denver to repeal the ban. It's gotten a lot of attention but the 7 council members that make the decision just don't give a ****. the majority of the people who live in Denver, even those who don't 'like' the breed ban, aren't really activist enough to do anything about it.

There's been several other rallies and petitions and the like to get it lifted but even recently it's been a wash. City council doesn't care and their constituents don't care enough to get them to care. I'm glad to hear the enforcement is relaxing a little but I still wouldn't feel safe bringing a bully-type on a walk through the city.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#13
Denver county is actually a very small part of the city/state. There is also a massive concerted effort by a number of organized parties to get the actual ban over turned. The pressure against the city is starting to have a toll.

But there's tons of places all around Denver that don't hold to the BSL.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top