8 rules for using aversives

sam

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
894
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Western Canada
#1
for Carrie, as promised

I had the opportunity to go to clicker expo and see Steve White who is a police dog trainer. He was fabulous. He started his career in dogs in the military and police using fairly scary compulsion methods. He now uses clicker training type methods , although obviously not always actually using a clicker since it's hard to hold a leash, a gun, a flashlight and a clicker :p He is still training police dogs but also training police dog trainers to use
non-compulsive methods.
His results have been staggering- they are training dogs with a much higher degree of reliability, a higher percentage of dogs complete the program and dogs are completing the program and out working faster. He tours the country as a consultant to other K9 units. He also consults to service dog programs. His website is www.i2ik9.com incase anyone wanst to check him out.

Steve talked about a variety of things. One of the things he talked about was the problems that arose in training dogs with traditional methods for police work and tracking. He had what he called the 8 rules for using aversives - which basically shows how hard it is to use aversives in a useful way, that actually teaches the dog something and without huge negative consequences.

so...The 8 rules for using aversives (in order for them to work in training)

1) It must be something the dog doesn't like and does not expect.

--are collar pops unexpected ? heck no

2) It must actually suppress the behavior

-using aversives that don't work is at best nagging, at worst abuse

3) It must be applied in the perfect intensity

Too much / too harsh = dog shuts down and can't learn
Too little / not harsh enough = development of a "punishment callous" actually teaches dog to become imune to punishment and "tough it out"

4) Must be IMMEDIATE

or it won't be associated with the behavior you're trying to suppress

5) Must be associated with the behavior
and not you-- other wise you get a dog whose behavior is suppressed in your presence, but continues when you aren't present.
"sneaky dog syndrome" = the dog associates the punishment with YOU more so than the behavior.
Steve commented how dogs often don't understand what they are being punished for but how they are remarkably good at figuring it that YOU are involved or connected somehow- even when using hands off tools like electronic collars.

6) Must happen EVERY TIME the behavior does
-otherwise you are just putting the misbehavior on a variable reinforcement scheduel which just makes the behavior stronger and harder to extinguish

7) There must be an alternative behavior trained or available to the dog
- trying to punish away a behavior that is really strong doesn't work unless you replace it with another behavior
ie punishing a dog for jumping up when he greets isn't usually successful unless you reinforce an alternate greeting behavior like sitting - the dog is social and has a strong desire to greet.

8) The aversive must never outweigh the reinforcement in the dogs mind
-or the dog "checks out" and learning shuts down

Steve also talked about teaching crossover dogs (dogs that had been originally trained with force and aversives) and about teaching 'advanced decision making skills' to dogs. Very interesting stuff.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
#2
I'm so glad that you posted this Sam. I saw this in an issue of APDT chronical but couldn't find it when I wanted to share it. Very interesting.:)
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#3
Do you mind if I save this and perhaps post it again on other forums? I've been struggling on other forums with people that push and push the correctional methods, and I think this would be a wonderful thing to post.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#4
Thank you so much Sam, for posting this very important information. Yes, Steve White is remarkable and it's so good to hear how influential he is. That is so true about aversives, how ineffective and potentially damaging they are. I'm so glad you posted this.

It's a very strange phenomenon, that with the more intelligent training methods out there for the world to see and they have been for some time, that compulsive and stern treatment to dogs still flourishes. It's really quite amazing to me. I guess it's because for years we have been told we have to be the "alpha" and we have to dominate and be stern with our dogs or they can't possibly understand us and they'll rise up and take over our households. So, people are always looking for what kind of aversive they can do, be it yanking, spraying things in their faces, grabbing their muzzles, shouting, "NO!!!!" at them. I just wish people would think of what they can do to get their dog to do the behavior they want their dog to do, rather that what behavior they do not want their dog to do. If people would turn their brains over onto the flip side and start learning how to "train with a brain," the world would be a lot fairer for our dogs. Heaven knows...they deserve the best.

Thank you again for posting this.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
60
Likes
0
Points
0
#5
I watched his videos and it amazed me how quickly that Aussie picked up on the scent detection. I also thought it was pretty cool that he had a vid of a K9 from the Bremerton PD, which is my hometown. :D Plus that retrieving a hot dog thing looks like a pretty cool skill.
 

sam

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
894
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Western Canada
#7
Do you mind if I save this and perhaps post it again on other forums? I've been struggling on other forums with people that push and push the correctional methods, and I think this would be a wonderful thing to post.
Do whatcha like with it. I basically regurgitated the notes I took in his seminar which I don't *think* are copyrighted. I hope I haven't done anything wrong by posting it here. I don't think so.
Steve is a very cool guy and basically and basically siad the important thing is to get the word out. He talked about once seeing a guy who had come to one of his seminars later teaching seminars based on his stuff (with no mention of or credit given to Steve- he seemed to think it was the sincerest form of flattery.

Cassie--I've been meaning to try teaching the hotdog retrieve to my dogs for a while now. A friend of mine did it with her collie and it sure is the best party trick I've ever seen!:D
 

sam

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
894
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Western Canada
#8
This is really good and explains why aversives aren't a good idea for non-professional trainers. I hope a lot of people will read this. I learned something!

Certainly pros are better at using ANY method but Steve's point is actually not that aversives should only be used by pros, but that there are actually far better methods out there that just WORK BETTER to teach dogs. He isn't about to say that he NEVER uses a correction or *any* aversive tool but he did say that the last police dog he trained got a grand total of 4 corrections in the course of his training from the very start to being a fully fledged working police dog. There are better ways!
 

Sugardog

New Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
46
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
California
#9
Nice post Sam!

Doberluv, I have just managed to put two and two together and figured out who you were from another forum. I feel reallllllly stupid now lol :D
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#10
Sugardog, I never thought of that. Over there, I use my real name, Carrie. It never occured to me to tell you that I was one in the same. How did you put two and two together? Is it my long posts? LOL! Anyhow, you shouldn't feel stupid. How could someone with the name, Carrie call herself Doberluv? LOL. Not much of a connection there......except maybe that I love Dobermans. (?) And maybe you saw my dog's name, Lyric written in both places.
 

Sugardog

New Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
46
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
California
#14
Meh, not a good time to start a Cesar Millan debate :p

Over on the Dogster forum, (idk if anybody else has an account) some moron is defending him with their life and has accused me of being jealous because I'm not as great and famous as Cesar ROLF :lol-sign: :rolleyes:

Carrie, I got a hint when Sam (which I think may be Sammy from GP, correct me if I'm wrong) announced your real name in the original topic.

Then I looked at your profile, the location, dog names etc, then went at looked at your other profile and it all matched up lol. And yes, the first thought that popped in my head was "ahhh well that explains the length and intelligence in her posts" :D

I've been on dog forums for 2 years now and I'm not easily impressed. You are one of 2 people that I've met over my two years on internet forums that I nearly always agree with and can learn something from. I may only be 17, but I can pass (and have passed) as a professional dog trainer/behaviorist if I would keep my mouth shut about my age. I'm a bit beyond basics, so it takes a bit more from a post for me to actually learn something or get something out of it. Plus I'm all positive reinforcement, so that makes it even harder with all the Cesar Millan worshippers out there.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#16
Meh, not a good time to start a Cesar Millan debate :p

Over on the Dogster forum, (idk if anybody else has an account) some moron is defending him with their life and has accused me of being jealous because I'm not as great and famous as Cesar ROLF

Carrie, I got a hint when Sam (which I think may be Sammy from GP, correct me if I'm wrong) announced your real name in the original topic.

Then I looked at your profile, the location, dog names etc, then went at looked at your other profile and it all matched up lol. And yes, the first thought that popped in my head was "ahhh well that explains the length and intelligence in her posts"

I've been on dog forums for 2 years now and I'm not easily impressed. You are one of 2 people that I've met over my two years on internet forums that I nearly always agree with and can learn something from. I may only be 17, but I can pass (and have passed) as a professional dog trainer/behaviorist if I would keep my mouth shut about my age. I'm a bit beyond basics, so it takes a bit more from a post for me to actually learn something or get something out of it. Plus I'm all positive reinforcement, so that makes it even harder with all the Cesar Millan worshippers out there.
Thank you Sugardog. You're exaggerating and much too generous in your compliments to me, but very kind nevertheless.

I would never have guessed that you're just 17...such a good handle on training. You'll do wonderfully. I too, enjoy learning things from you and the other smart people on this board too.

Yes, some CM fans do fall back on that "you're just jealous" come-back. Silly, isn't it. Jealous of his money? Yes. But not his "methods." LOL. I'd be afraid to ever go on one of those boards...I have a hard enough time keeping my mouth shut here. I'd be banned for sure on a CM forum. LOL.

hehehe too late at night to get into a good vent? LOL
OC....exactly! Now, it's too early in the morning. But if it were an emergency, I'd go ahead and dive in. Hee hee hee.
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#17
Meh, not a good time to start a Cesar Millan debate :

I've been on dog forums for 2 years now and I'm not easily impressed. You are one of 2 people that I've met over my two years on internet forums that I nearly always agree with and can learn something from. I may only be 17, but I can pass (and have passed) as a professional dog trainer/behaviorist if I would keep my mouth shut about my age. I'm a bit beyond basics, so it takes a bit more from a post for me to actually learn something or get something out of it. Plus I'm all positive reinforcement, so that makes it even harder with all the Cesar Millan worshippers out there.
Tell me about it! Lol. Right now I'm fighting a bit of a war on two other forums with people that worship Millan as well. Frustrating as heck, but I've just got to keep my informative posts kind and constructive, and I'm hoping eventually I might break through. Or at least prove to them that I might know what I'm talking about and my training methods aren't complete garbage. ;)

And I so agree about Carrie! Definitely impresses me! A great deal of my knowledge has come from her and many other extremely educated trainers on forums. On many of my other forums people really do not have a clue about my age, and all expect that I'm a professional trainer of some sort. But all that knowledge is thanks to wonderful trainers such as Carrie that have helped to educate me so that I can then apply it to my training. :)
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#18
Tessa, thank you. But I must say that I can not take total credit at all. We all learn from other people, as well as our own experience and trial and error. I've learned things from you too. I've learned some things from the best trainers out there and those people are really who deserve the credit...people like Jean Donaldson, for instance, among many others. Thanks though for such kind words.
 

Whisper

Kaleidoscopic Eye
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
13,749
Likes
1
Points
38
Age
32
#19
Thanks for posting that!
LOL, Sugardog! I went over and checked that thread out. Good grief!
You are an awesome trainer, Carrie, I really admire you, Doc, and the other amazing trainers we have here. :)
 

Sugardog

New Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
46
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
California
#20
I will usually post my opinion once on dog whisperer threads (which actually turns into a few posts because I forget things the first time around and I'm too lazy to type out every criticism I can make about him). I try to avoid arguing because they aren't going to change their mind no matter how much I argue and there's no way that they are going to get anywhere trying to convince me that cesar is god and dogs are built around dominance and his methods are great. I've pretty much decided (well, i have no choice to begin with, but thats besides the point) that although collar pops and other harsher, old school training methods are totally unnecessary, at least the people who use them correctly do have control over their dogs and their dogs aren't total monsters like an untrained, undersocialized beast. I just wish people would be more open minded you know? I mean, how do they know that you can't raise a puppy all positive reinforcement or cure aggressions using all positive reinforcement if they've never done it themselves? It just puzzles me that people are so set on using collar pops and other Cesar Millan methods that they don't even make an attempt to learn how to train all positive.

I would never have guessed that you're just 17...such a good handle on training. You'll do wonderfully. I too, enjoy learning things from you and the other smart people on this board too.
Thanks :) I want to do what Cesar Millan does, rehabilitate aggressions and take in rescues. Except I plan on doing it all positive reinforcement :cool:
 

Members online

Top