Selling Dogs on Twitter?

How do you feel about this guy selling his dog on Twitter?

  • Big dogs can't be around kids, so I agree with selling the dog on Twitter.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's understandable: big dogs can't be around kids, and he needed it gone ASAP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Twitter is just a social media site and there is nothing wrong with this.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I disagree with selling the dog on Twitter

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I disagree with selling the dog on Twitter AND the rush to do it

    Votes: 1 5.6%
  • I disagree with the Twitter, the rush, and the excuse (dog too big)

    Votes: 14 77.8%
  • It would have been fine had the dog been free

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There is nothing wrong with any of this.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • Lemon Cake

    Votes: 1 5.6%

  • Total voters
    18

*blackrose

"I'm kupo for kupo nuts!"
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
7,065
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
33
Location
WI
#2
I don't really care that he sold the dog on Twitter, or that he was rehoming it because it was "too big" for his kid...what I do care is that he "took bids" and "the dog had to be gone by tomorrow". That is what irks me.
 

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#4
As usual it's not about the tool used (twitter, puppy find, facebook, craigslist whatever) it's about HOW IT'S DONE

and taking bids and wanting the dog GONE and not screening puppy buyers...is the wrong way no matter what.

Twitter in general I have no problem with, use what tool works to best communicate/advertise
 

Locke

Active Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2010
Messages
1,919
Likes
0
Points
36
#5
I don't really care that he sold the dog on Twitter, or that he was rehoming it because it was "too big" for his kid...what I do care is that he "took bids" and "the dog had to be gone by tomorrow". That is what irks me.
This, and the dog's coat looked to be in terrible condition!
 

Xandra

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
3,806
Likes
0
Points
36
#6
It's fine by me. Some people have different attitudes about children and pets... to some people, the pets are part of the family, to others, the pet is there to serve them.

Maybe the dog isn't particularly gentle with your child or you find yourself nervous about the dog being around the kid. You're not attached at all, really. If that's how you feel, why keep the dog?

I don't care that he sold it on twitter.

I take the "must be gone by tomorrow" and "bid on him" comments with a grain of salt. If he really was going to send the dog to the animal shelter or euthanize it the next day, of course I'd feel differently, but he was probably just mimicking a common technique for generating interest without thinking much about it.

Not ideal, but not the end of the world as long as he used some common sense when meeting the buyer. It would be worse if it was from a "dog person," but for an average pet owner that probably bought the dog under similar circumstances... eh, I have a hard time getting worked up about it.
 

*blackrose

"I'm kupo for kupo nuts!"
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
7,065
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
33
Location
WI
#7
This, and the dog's coat looked to be in terrible condition!
I thought that, too. Allergies galore, probably. Poor dog. Hope whoever got him will get him the treatment he needs.
 

Airn

New Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
1,044
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Bentonville, AR
#8
My issues are similar to everyone else's. I don't really care about Twitter, although I don't think you should 'sell' a dog on any social media sites. (Saw a chocolate pom for sale for $800 on CL today....)

I don't understand the need for any animals to be 'gone by tomorrow'. It really just does sound like a phrase to scare people into taking the dog.

The bidding thing was ridiculous, but he's a rich basketball player, so I don't expect much from him.

Just be grateful Michael Vick wasn't bidding on him.
 

Beanie

Clicker Cult Coordinator
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
14,012
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Illinois
#9
I would be looking at this in a totally different light if it weren't a professional basketball player who has more than enough money to board the dog ("must be gone tomorrow?") or to hire a professional trainer to train the dog if it's rambunctious with the kid, or or or.
Unless he's had another one, which I'm not aware of but is admittedly entirely possible, his youngest son is two. The dog is ten months old. So he's an idiot. And just because millions of people are idiots doesn't make any given idiot less stupid.


I agree with Fran as well - I would probably raise an eyebrow over the Twitter thing, then laugh, but not think anything particularly wrong or weird had been done, if it weren't for the DOG MUST BE GONE TOMORROW. TAKING OFFERS. stuff.
 

ACooper

Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
27,772
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
IN
#10
Toss me in the club. Using twitter doesn't bother me, it's his attitude, statements and obvious lack of screening that bothers me. "Must be gone tomorrow" trumps the "Just want him to have a good home" statement doesn't it?

Using ANY means on the internet doesn't bother me in the least.....it helps you cast a wider net.
Craig's list? Sure! Facebook? You bet! Twitter? Forums? Blogs? YES YES YES!

As with any TOOL, it's all how you use it........or abuse it as the case may be.
 

Cali Mae

Little dog, big voice
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Messages
907
Likes
1
Points
18
Location
Canada
#11
Agreed with everyone else... and I'm completely baffled as to why anyone, rich or not, would spend $3000 on a dog who doesn't even appear to be from a good, ethical breeder.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top