You don't seem to have any grasp of what the trickle down economic theory was about But I won't bother to offer you any edification since you are already possessed of all possible worthwhile knowledge , as you so ably proved with your expert breast feeding advice.
Here we go with the sexism. Just because I am male I am not allowed to have a view on whether breast milk is better than formula? I mean, it shouldn't matter that I understand (and have personally researched) the biochemical benefits?
For the past decade there has been uncertainty whether infant nutritional formulas should be supplemented with the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA). Docosahexaenoic acid, a predominant component of the phospholipids in the central nervous system (12-15%), is derived from the dietary precursor α-linolenic acid; whereas, arachidonic acid can be derived from linoleic acid. (Catalan et al., 2002) Although conventional formulas contain these precursors, whether pre-formed DHA and AA should be added to formulas has been the subject of intense debate in recent years. Evidence has shown that formula-fed human infants develop lower concentrations of AA and DHA than those fed breast milk, but the effects of this discrepancy on cognitive function are not entirely clear. A LC-PUFA deficiency during development may (or may not) lead to deficits in brain DHA/AA, and a resulting impairment of many cognitive functions such as learning ability, visual acuity, and visual recognition memory.
Wha?! Edumafucation?! Wha that??!?