I'm usually on the fence with these kinds of things. Really though, I think it's all in the approach.
My last (and best) English class involved a lot of reading and analyzing. I, like several others, was not a big fan of such things. I didn't like being told what I should or shouldn't have gotten out of the story. But my teacher was very good about letting us kind of speak our minds when it came to the messages and symbols we perceived. There was the general stuff that was being taught in lessons (symbolism and the like) but she also wanted to hear if you had picked up on anything else. Or if you disagreed with something in the lesson. You just had to be able to make a case for your line of thinking. So I had a lot more fun with it because it became less of a "In this story the king represents god - tell me why/how that is" situation and more of a "What do you think the king represented? Why did you think this" type deal.
What surprised me most of all, was I actually ENJOYED discussing the books after that. We would have class discussions/debates where everyone shared their views, commented, etc. It turned out to be really fun. Which basically tells me that my problem was more with being forced to come to a specific answer in the past rather then the actual analysis part.
Now all that rambling aside, my point is that for me at least, it was all in finding the right teacher with that right approach. I wasn't at all a fan of English up till that last class. I'm glad I did get a chance to change my views though since as many have mentioned, critical thinking, analysis and all that are very much useful later in life.