Ron Paul: The Facts.

Herschel

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
3,303
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
East Central Illinois
#1
The last thread was absolutely disgusting. First, there are misinformation. Then, there was misunderstanding. Finally, it devolved into name-calling, polarizing attacks, and more misinformation.

Personally, I am "pro-choice" but Ron Paul is the only candidate (Republican or Democrat) that has properly supported his view.

*PLEASE LEAVE THE ABORTION DEBATE OUT OF THIS THREAD*

This is Ron Paul's official stance on abortion:

In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.

I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life.

I have also authored HR 1095, which prevents federal funds to be used for so-called “population control.â€

He wants to ban partial-birth abortion, except for when the fetus endangers the mother's life:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/83/the-partial-birth-abortion-ban/

"Under the 9th and 10 amendments, all authority over matters not specifically addressed in the Constitution remains with state legislatures. Therefore the federal government has no authority whatsoever to involve itself in the abortion issue. So while Roe v. Wade is invalid, a federal law banning abortion across all 50 states would be equally invalid."
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/85/federalizing-social-policy/

*IF YOU WANT TO DISCUSS RON PAUL'S VIEWS ON ABORTION, START YOUR OWN THREAD*
--------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a lot of misinformation floating around about Ron Paul. A lot of this stems, as Grammy so nicely pointed out in the last thread, from the main stream media's lack of coverage.

There are YouTube videos for each of these topics from debates, speeches to the House of Representatives, etc. Let me know if you would like to see them.

The War in Iraq:
Ron Paul voted against the war, and still believes it was unconstitutional. His justification is here:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/63/fixing-whats-wrong-with-iraq/

Taxes:
Ron Paul will abolish the IRS. Currently, all of us work until the end of May before we start to earn money for ourselves. It is against the Constitution for our own government to steal nearly half of our income.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/35/do-tax-cuts-cost-the-government-money/

Why are goods from China so cheap?
We pay them $4 billion per year to make sure they are cheaper than American goods.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/36/your-taxes-subsidize-china/

Personal liberty:
Ron Paul voted against the Patriot Act and consistently fights it. http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/110/domestic-surveillance-and-the-patriot-act/

Medicare and Prescription Drug Benefit:
Our government can't afford the current programs. We need to rethink the role of government, not "reform" the currently flawed syste.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/73/the-coming-entitlement-meltdown/

The Environment:
The federal government has proven itself untrustworthy with environmental policy by facilitating polluters, subsidizing logging in the National Forests, and instituting one-size-fits-all approaches that too often discriminate against those they are intended to help.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/240/respect-for-property-rights-necessary-for-freedom/

Government coercion:
Simply put, freedom is the absence of government coercion. Our Founding Fathers understood this, and created the least coercive government in the history of the world. The Constitution established a very limited, decentralized government to provide national defense and little else. States, not the federal government, were charged with protecting individuals against criminal force and fraud. For the first time, a government was created solely to protect the rights, liberties, and property of its citizens.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/161/what-does-freedom-really-mean/

Gold vs. Paper Money
In November 2000 Saddam Hussein demanded Euros for his oil. His arrogance was a threat to the dollar; his lack of any military might was never a threat. At the first cabinet meeting with the new administration in 2001, as reported by Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, the major topic was how we would get rid of Saddam Hussein-- though there was no evidence whatsoever he posed a threat to us. This deep concern for Saddam Hussein surprised and shocked O’Neill.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr021506.htm

Inflation:
This decline in the value of the dollar is simple to explain. The dollar loses value as the direct result of the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury increasing the money supply. Inflation, as the late Milton Friedman explained, is always a monetary phenomenon. The federal government consistently wants to spend more than it can tax and borrow, so Congress turns to the Fed for help in covering the difference. The result is more dollars, both real and electronic – which means the value of every existing dollar goes down.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul354.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj9KHJRRUbQ

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Any questions?

I seriously believe he is the President that America needs.
 

Buddy'sParents

*Finding My Inner Fila*
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
25,377
Likes
0
Points
36
#2
The last thread was absolutely disgusting. First, there are misinformation. Then, there was misunderstanding. Finally, it devolved into name-calling, polarizing attacks, and more misinformation.
.....sounds like politics.....


*runs*



:p
 

MelissaCato

ĜȫƝ ₩īĿÐ
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
1,461
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Under a Rock in the USA!
#3
Yes, Ron Paul 2008 !!

The last thread was absolutely disgusting. First, there are misinformation. Then, there was misunderstanding. Finally, it devolved into name-calling, polarizing attacks, and more misinformation.

Personally, I am "pro-choice" but Ron Paul is the only candidate (Republican or Democrat) that has properly supported his view.

*PLEASE LEAVE THE ABORTION DEBATE OUT OF THIS THREAD*

This is Ron Paul's official stance on abortion:

In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.

I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life.

I have also authored HR 1095, which prevents federal funds to be used for so-called “population control.â€

He wants to ban partial-birth abortion, except for when the fetus endangers the mother's life:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/83/the-partial-birth-abortion-ban/

"Under the 9th and 10 amendments, all authority over matters not specifically addressed in the Constitution remains with state legislatures. Therefore the federal government has no authority whatsoever to involve itself in the abortion issue. So while Roe v. Wade is invalid, a federal law banning abortion across all 50 states would be equally invalid."
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/85/federalizing-social-policy/

*IF YOU WANT TO DISCUSS RON PAUL'S VIEWS ON ABORTION, START YOUR OWN THREAD*
--------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a lot of misinformation floating around about Ron Paul. A lot of this stems, as Grammy so nicely pointed out in the last thread, from the main stream media's lack of coverage.

There are YouTube videos for each of these topics from debates, speeches to the House of Representatives, etc. Let me know if you would like to see them.

The War in Iraq:
Ron Paul voted against the war, and still believes it was unconstitutional. His justification is here:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/63/fixing-whats-wrong-with-iraq/

Taxes:
Ron Paul will abolish the IRS. Currently, all of us work until the end of May before we start to earn money for ourselves. It is against the Constitution for our own government to steal nearly half of our income.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/35/do-tax-cuts-cost-the-government-money/

Why are goods from China so cheap?
We pay them $4 billion per year to make sure they are cheaper than American goods.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/36/your-taxes-subsidize-china/

Personal liberty:
Ron Paul voted against the Patriot Act and consistently fights it. http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/110/domestic-surveillance-and-the-patriot-act/

Medicare and Prescription Drug Benefit:
Our government can't afford the current programs. We need to rethink the role of government, not "reform" the currently flawed syste.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/73/the-coming-entitlement-meltdown/

The Environment:
The federal government has proven itself untrustworthy with environmental policy by facilitating polluters, subsidizing logging in the National Forests, and instituting one-size-fits-all approaches that too often discriminate against those they are intended to help.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/240/respect-for-property-rights-necessary-for-freedom/

Government coercion:
Simply put, freedom is the absence of government coercion. Our Founding Fathers understood this, and created the least coercive government in the history of the world. The Constitution established a very limited, decentralized government to provide national defense and little else. States, not the federal government, were charged with protecting individuals against criminal force and fraud. For the first time, a government was created solely to protect the rights, liberties, and property of its citizens.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/161/what-does-freedom-really-mean/

Gold vs. Paper Money
In November 2000 Saddam Hussein demanded Euros for his oil. His arrogance was a threat to the dollar; his lack of any military might was never a threat. At the first cabinet meeting with the new administration in 2001, as reported by Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, the major topic was how we would get rid of Saddam Hussein-- though there was no evidence whatsoever he posed a threat to us. This deep concern for Saddam Hussein surprised and shocked O’Neill.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr021506.htm

Inflation:
This decline in the value of the dollar is simple to explain. The dollar loses value as the direct result of the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury increasing the money supply. Inflation, as the late Milton Friedman explained, is always a monetary phenomenon. The federal government consistently wants to spend more than it can tax and borrow, so Congress turns to the Fed for help in covering the difference. The result is more dollars, both real and electronic – which means the value of every existing dollar goes down.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul354.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj9KHJRRUbQ

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Any questions?

I seriously believe he is the President that America needs.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
2,434
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Oregon
#4
"In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.

I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life."

Thats not going to win the pro-choice vote. Its a step back from the current position and in all likelihood, will result in choice being taken from some people. To take his position across the board would result in many things being changed. Are people willing to allow locally manufactured drugs? It will be up to the states. Can I manufacture a fully automatic machine gun in my basement? If neither of those crosses a state or national border, its a state issue. Don't forget to say goodbye to the "REAL ID" thing that they're pushing to reduce terrorism. That might not win too many republican votes.

Lastly, has anyone mentioned the racist comments in his newsletter years back? He seems to have blamed that on the editor, but if he cant oversee an editor, how can he properly oversee the government? Even the reduced one he seems to want?
 

Herschel

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
3,303
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
East Central Illinois
#5
If neither of those crosses a state or national border, its a state issue. Don't forget to say goodbye to the "REAL ID" thing that they're pushing to reduce terrorism. That might not win too many republican votes.
Real ID is a really bad idea. I don't need the federal government taking away any more of my rights, nor do I need them spying on me.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles...s-wont-stop-terrorism-or-illegal-immigration/

Lastly, has anyone mentioned the racist comments in his newsletter years back? He seems to have blamed that on the editor, but if he cant oversee an editor, how can he properly oversee the government? Even the reduced one he seems to want?[/QUOTE]

"I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name."

Part 1 of CNN response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6rxts0-f9w

Part 2 of CNN response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82CYNV0U_kg

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/press-re...ew-republic-article-regarding-old-newsletters
 

MelissaCato

ĜȫƝ ₩īĿÐ
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
1,461
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Under a Rock in the USA!
#7
Read the REAL ID Act, HR 418, for yourself. Its text is available on the Library of Congress website. A careful reading also reveals that states will be required to participate in the “Drivers License Agreement,†which was crafted by DMV lobbyists years ago. This agreement creates a massive database of sensitive information on American citizens that can be shared with Canada and Mexico or any other for that matter!

SEC. 203. LINKING OF DATABASES.

Bill Number: H. R. 418 (IH)
Bill Title: REAL ID Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)

(a) In General- To be eligible to receive any grant or other type of financial assistance made available under this title, a State shall participate in the interstate compact regarding sharing of driver license data, known as the `Driver License Agreement', in order to provide electronic access by a State to information contained in the motor vehicle databases of all other States.

(b) Requirements for Information- A State motor vehicle database shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:

(1) All data fields printed on drivers' licenses and identification cards issued by the State.

(2) Motor vehicle drivers' histories, including motor vehicle violations, suspensions, and points on licenses.

Title : 18
Chapter : 47
Part : 1
Code : 1028 Driver License Agreement

(6) the term “issuing authorityâ€â€”

(A) means any governmental entity or agency that is authorized to issue identification documents, means of identification, or authentication features; and
(B) includes the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international government or quasi-governmental organization;
Sooooo, the question is this ..... Do we want a One World Government (New World Order) or not ?

To read more and I would if I WAS YOU... follow this crypt link... http://www.loc.gov/fedsearch/records.tkl?cclquery=REAL+ID+Act+HR+418+%20&start=1&id=target-thomas.tkl&targets%5B%5D=thomas&targets%5B%5D=recommend&alltargets=targets%5B%5D~ammem|targets%5B%5D~ppoc|targets%5B%5D~z3950|targets%5B%5D~webpages|targets%5B%5D~thomas|targets%5B%5D~recommend|

This is a direct mockery of our 10th amendment. Here I'll post that for ya to naw unst.

TENTH AMENDMENT -The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
:yikes::yikes::yikes::yikes:
 

MelissaCato

ĜȫƝ ₩īĿÐ
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
1,461
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Under a Rock in the USA!
#8
Now that I think about it :rolleyes: I and those of us that don't support the REAL ID Act HR 418 to name just one, because we follow the Constitution in fine details and Understand the founding fathers famous piece of paper The United States Constitution, Bill of Rights ohhh and the Declaration of Independence are now subject to S. 1959 "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007" :yikes: :rolleyes: And with the Patriotic Act to back it up can be stripped of all "sovereign people" rights as stated in the Constitution ("sovereign people") and sent off to another counrty. :cool: I wonder wich country they would send me too ?

Sooo another question for 2008 is wether we respect and believe in the US Constitution as the founding fathers intended for our FREEDOM.... or well you figure it out ... I can tell after the REAL ID Act HR 418 you can bet your bottom dollar RFID will be embedded in human bodies for sure.

Vote Ron Paul.
 

Herschel

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
3,303
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
East Central Illinois
#10
Here's a video clip of the Dr. supporting the Constitution ... this video clip keeps getting deleted off the tube for some reason ... hurry and watch ...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pZ_Z_XG0L2c
That was my favorite part of the debate. I was sitting at home clapping. He body slammed the guy.

The Fox recap of the debate on their website just happens to omit that part. Fascist bastards.

Ron Paul said:
Let me see if I get this right….

We borrow 10 billion dollars from China and then we give it to [Gen. Pervez] Musharraf, who is a military dictator, who overthrew an elected government, and then we go to war, we loose all these lives promoting democracy in....Iraq?!
Brilliant.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top