Ahhh, MAN!! I admit to a vast overwhelming disappointment that I come back here and my very valid questions were NOT addressed! *LOL*
I'm not surprised, though. Being exposed certainly takes the wind out of one's sails, so to speak.
This whole thread started off about a piece of property being marketed as a business property rated for 150 dogs, and the photos were more than disturbing to a number of us. And then a couple of people started to defend it adamantly. It wasn't until the truth came out (already suspected by most of us, I'm sure) that at least one of those in question appears to be a less than ethical breeder herself (IMHO) that the defense faltered and we just aren't hearing much anymore.
And of course, pertinent questions regarding their own feelings about housing dogs in small wire crates, keeping 150 dogs, breeding them over and over until they're of no more use, etc. were completely avoided. I think that most of us would willingly answer these questions. But then again, most of us would not advertise on nextdaypets, puppy-central.com, dogs-central.com, betterbreederscorner.com, gotdogsonline.com, gotpupsonline.com, terrificpets.com, (the list goes on from here for FrenchK's advertising, I'm sure - these are just the ones I noticed in a quick search).
It's truly interesting that as soon as the argument starts to fail, those of us against a large-scale puppy breeding operation are called "animal rights activists". And not only that, but there's a comparison to a racist comment added in to further the concept that WE are SO bad because we don't want to see animals suffer.
As I said before - WHAT UTTER NONSENSE!!
Believing in the human right to own animals does not mean we have to give in to those who think that animals are purely property and can be treated like a bicycle or a pair of shoes. We aren't AR people just because we show concern for how animals are treated!
And to bring that right back to the OP - it's very likely that the property advertised will end up in the hands of someone who thinks they'll make their living off of indiscriminate breeding of small dogs. I wonder how many Japanese chins would end up in that "mass-breeding" farm (trying to be politically correct here and not use the term "puppy mill", just to placate those who can't see past terminology). I wonder if the puppies bought for this potential new "mass-breeding" farm would be purchased from nextdaypets or puppy-central ...
I love GOOD breeders. The good breeders I know treat their dogs like family. They don't make them live in kennels. They don't have more dogs than they can logically deal with on a daily basis. They absolutely do NOT advertise on nextdaypets or any other "mass-produced sale" site. And they don't expect $1200 for a pet quality puppy!
Unfortunately the breeders who show a few dogs and keep a large quantity of "breeding" dogs, advertising willy-nilly everywhere they might snag an unsuspecting buyer, sell for high prices, and get rid of dogs that no longer fit their purposes provide tons of fodder for the AR people. They can show the indifference toward dogs, obvious in the advertisements and the selling of older dogs that are beyond show or breeding age. They can show it in the way the dogs are kept - kenneled, for the most part, because there are way too many dogs to truly handle daily. THESE are the things that AR people jump right on and gloat over. And yet these "breeders" are the ones screaming "AR!!!" at us because WE don't want to see a puppy mill start up??
Ack. I'm out of here. Taking my FIVE dogs for a walk because with just FIVE you can do that. Yes, they get out of the house - not just in a kennel - every day! What a concept.
Melanie and the gang in Alaska