The IPDTA believes Cesar Milan's techniques
to be not only grossly outdated,
they are potentially damaging to a dog's
physical and psychological well-being!
Response to Cesar Milan and his methods from a positive dog trainer/behaviorist
From Andrew Luescher, DVM, Veterinary Behaviorist
Animal Behavior Clinic
Purdue University
"I reviewed the four preview-videotapes kindly submitted to me by National Geographic. I very much appreciate having gotten the opportunity to see these tapes before the program goes on the air. I will be happy to review any programs that deal with domestic animal behavior and training. I believe this is a responsibility of our profession.
I have been involved in continuing education for dog trainers for over 10 years, first through the
How Dogs Learn" program at the University of Guelph (Ontario Veterinary College) and then through the DOGS! Course at Purdue University. I therefore know very well where dog training stands today, and I must tell you that Millan's techniques are outdated and unacceptable not only to the veterinary community, but also to dog trainers. The first question regarding the above mentioned tapes I have is this: The show repeatedly cautions the viewers not to attempt these techniques at home. What then is the purpose of this show? I think we have to be realistic: people will try these techniques at home, much to the detriment of their pets.
Millan's techniques are almost exclusively based on two techniques:
Flooding and
positive punishment. In flooding, an animal is exposed to a fear (or aggression) evoking stimulus and prevented from leaving the situation, until it stops reacting. To take a human example: arachnophobia would be treated by locking a person into a closet, releasing hundreds of spiders into that closet, and keeping the door shut until the person stops reacting. The person might be cured by that, but also might be severely disturbed and would have gone through an excessive amount of stress. Flooding has therefore always been considered a risky and cruel method of treatment.
Positive punishment refers to applying an aversive stimulus or correction as a consequence of a behavior. There are many concerns about punishment aside from its unpleasantness. Punishment is entirely inappropriate for most types of aggression and for any behavior that involves anxiety. Punishment can suppress most behavior but does not resolve the underlying problem, i.e., the fear or anxiety. Even in cases where correctly applied punishment might be considered appropriate, many conditions have to be met that most dog owners can't meet: The punishment has to be applied every time the behavior is displayed, within ½ second of the behavior, and at the correct intensity."
"Most of the theoretical explanations that Millan gives regarding causes of the behavior problems are wrong. Not one of these dogs had any issue with dominance. Not one of these dogs wanted to control their owners. What he was right about was that calmness and consistency are extremely important, but they don't make the presented methods appropriate or justifiable."
"The last episode (compulsive disorder) is particularly unsettling because compulsive disorder is related to an imbalance in neurotransmitter levels or receptors, and is therefore unequivocally a medical condition. Would it be appropriate to treat obsessive compulsive disorder in people with punishment? Or have a layperson go around treating such patients?"
"My colleagues and I and innumerable leaders in the dog training community have worked now for decades to eliminate such cruel, ineffective (in terms of true cure) and inappropriate techniques. "
________________________________________________________________
“Dominance” Fact or Fiction
By Norma Jeanne Laurette
Let me begin by saying I was taught the “dominance” theory - as it pertains
to our pet dog's and their behaviour toward us, their owners. Within the first
year of running dog training classes, I garbaged the choke chain, pinch collar,
alpha rollover and all use of force or physical punishment, because I quickly
realized the potential harm to the dog, both physically and psychologically.
At that point I didn't realize there were many trainers already using positive
methods, I was the only one in my city with my beliefs and I felt very much
alone. Since then, I have met so many of like mind, and have learned so much.
I'm happy to say, my city is now close to 100% positive trainers. Although I
no longer taught pushing or punishing, I did teach the “dominance” theory, but
I no longer agree with the concept, here's why.
There's a common belief that dogs will challenge their owners in an attempt to
rise in rank and lead the pack. This theory has been around for decades, and although still popular, many canine behaviour experts believe it to be incorrect.
Dog owners and trainers alike often use the “dominance” theory to explain a
variety of canine behaviours. Trainers often use this theory to justify the use of physical techniques designed to over-power the dog, to intimidate it into subservience, in order to stop unwanted behaviour. Unfortunately, this has cost
many dogs their lives. “Dominance exercises” have been directly related to
aggression and other unwanted behaviour, and in one case, the trainer actually
killed the dog while attempting to force it into submission. R10
The concept of “ranking” comes from the idea that a wolf will challenge another
of similar rank, hopefully winning each challenge, gaining higher status, and eventually, leading the pack. Many believe this behaviour has been passed down
over thousands of years, affecting the behaviour of domestic dogs with their
human families. R1
During the socialization period of development, a puppy is imprinted with
recognition of its own species. Dogs do not identify humans as “canines” or
“pack members”, because we smell, think and behave differently. R2 According
to John Fisher, because we are not perceived as dogs, they will not compete
with us for status. R3 Also, with “alpha” position comes the responsibility of
roviding for the pack. Because we provide everything the dog needs; food,
shelter etc., it would be counter-productive for a dog to challenge us for
“alpha” position. R4
In reality, only “unacquainted” wolves living in captivity compete for status,
especially during mating season, due to confined territories and limited
resources. R7 Wolves living in the wild are dominated by one alpha male and
female breeding pair, that guide and protect their cubs. R9 As soon as they are
old enough to mate, these cubs will leave the pack to find mates, and raise
families of their own. R8
According to Coppinger, dogs became isolated from their wild ancestors long
ago resulting in a new species, the Canis Familiaris - the domestic dog. R6
Although some wolf-like behaviours remain, as a different species, it's not
realistic to assume that all dog behaviours will be the same as that of the wolf. However, if we choose to compare domestic dogs' behaviour to it's natural
ancestors, we should be comparing it to the wild wolf, not wolves attempting
to survive in the face of human interference. R5
Every behaviour blamed on “dominance” is normal and can be explained by
simple motivation and reinforcement. It's quite simple, dogs want as many
good things as they can get. R11 If you saw a $100 bill lying in the street would
you not pick it up? Why then is a dog helping itself to your dinner “dominant”,
when they are scavengers by nature? It's not a “dominant” dog that takes your
food, it's a normal dog doing what comes naturally to its species.
If we want dogs to behave in a manner that is not normal to it's species, we
have to control the environment, teach new behaviours and reinforce them.
Although dogs need good leadership in order to be good companions,
“dominating” them has proven to be counter-productive at the very least. It's
time to stop blaming, labeling and punishing, and start teaching.
References
R1 - Dominance Fact or Fiction?, Barry Eaton 2002, Page 4 – Dominance: Where Does It
Come From?
R2 - Dominance Fact or Fiction?, Barry Eaton 2002, Page 4 – Pack Theory
R3 - Diary of a Dotty Dog Doctor, John Fisher 1997
R4 - Dominance Fact or Fiction?, Barry Eaton 2002, Page 5 – Pack Theory
R5 - Dominance Fact or Fiction?, Barry Eaton 2002, Page 7 – Origins Of The Pack Rules
R6 - The Domestic Dog, Edited by James Serpell 1999
R7 - Dominance Fact or Fiction? Barry Eaton 2002, Page 6 and 7 – Origins Of The Pack Rules
R8 - Dominance Fact or Fiction? Barry Eaton 2002, Page 7 – Origins Of The Pack Rules
R9 - Alpha Status, and Division of Labor in Wolf Packs, David Mech, 2000
R10 -
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbcentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/07/19/s1b_deaddog_0719.html
R11 – The Power of Positive Dog Training, Pat Miller, Howell Book House, Wiley Publishing Inc., 2001