She gave photos of the puppy's condition while he was with her. We see that he was good while in her care, and bad in the photos taken by the breeder. Make your own deductions from that. But no one here can make such serious accusations on the "proof" the breeder brings to the table when Teal brings just as valid proof. No one here can believe the breeder and then deny Teal...when they both have photographic evidence of the puppy. So, what do we know for sure? He was in good condition in the photos while with Teal... And in bad condition when with the breeder afterwards. Make your own deductions, but no one can accuse Teal of abuse and malnourishment the way RedChrome is doing. She is also shamefully dragging her personal life and children into this. This is obviously a personal agenda and vendetta that RedChrome has against Teal and has NOTHING to do with this **** puppy.
Well actually I (and several other people) don't think he looks all that great in some of those pictures. So... this isn't really an answer, because you're basing it on an assumption that I (and others) don't share.
And... honestly it seems like a more sensible explanation that the puppy was returned to the breeder in that condition than that the breeder got him back, starved him, then fattened him up all within a relatively short period of time just to make some random person look bad on the internet. This is a puppy, and he looks to be about the same size/age in those last pictures at Teal's as the first pictures of the breeder... there is limited time to work with if that was really her master plan.
I don't know Teal from a hole in the wall, but the pictures actually kind of make me think the allegations around this puppy are true. So I'm curious what Teal's explanation/answer to those questions is.
ETA: Although I agree that the stuff about the kid is irrelevant and crosses a line, with regard to
this puppy the pictures are pretty suspicious.