Inconsistencies? I'm concerned about people on this forums inability to read proper English. It has been said many times that the spots the dogs are on are secure, that they are not left unsupervised, and yet the argument continues on with you guys saying "I would never leave a dog outside unsupervised" and so on and so forth when it has been SAID that they were not unattended. You're confused because you're not reading, and it's sad that Tahlz has to beat the brunt of your judgemental attitude. Like I said, just because YOU do one thing with your dog, doesn't mean that everyone else has to abide by your rules and anyone that doesn't is wrong...that's not true. Just to clarify, to anyone who is confused and because Tahlz is too nice to really stand up for herself:
Tahlz went on vacation with her Mother and Sister. She left the dogs outside, with Serenity on a secure zipline and Sunny roaming their secure yard. They were left under the supervision of Tahlz's trusted friend, or her responsible brother. (That part I am unsure about.). either way, the dogs were NOT unsupervised. Tahlz's idiot brother, who doesn't even live with them, risked a police raid at their house. Whoever mentioned the tarp on top of the kennel, Serenity is not in a kennel...the kennel idea was discussed when Tahlz was thinking of a place Serenity could be put during the raid if it happened. (She was put there momentarily during the raid risk, while supervised and inside of a yard.) So no, she isn't in an unsecure kennel because she isn't even IN a kennel. Tahlz did not board her dogs because Serenity is a bite risk and boarding facilities are stressful and I agree with her decision to do that.
If anymore clarification is needed feel free to ask but the points you all have been addressing have been answered and then you claim you are "confused". There are no inconsistencies..the story has been the same from the start.