i don't understand this argument.
or this one.
so because there are worse people than cesar, cesar's all good? we're not supposed to have concerns about the disservices he is doing our breed, because there are people doing worse? though i can't say off the top of my head that i can think of any in prime time.
and i've yet to see anyone saying that a true APBT has to be DA, just that the majority are and to expect otherwise is to set the dog up for failure. i just never understand why DA is so distasteful to someone who owns bully breed dogs.
or this one.
so because there are worse people than cesar, cesar's all good? we're not supposed to have concerns about the disservices he is doing our breed, because there are people doing worse? though i can't say off the top of my head that i can think of any in prime time.
and i've yet to see anyone saying that a true APBT has to be DA, just that the majority are and to expect otherwise is to set the dog up for failure. i just never understand why DA is so distasteful to someone who owns bully breed dogs.
The second argument that you didn't understand wasn't an argument (I don't understand how you got that) I was asking for a poster to clarify what they said.
Why is DA distasteful.....hmmmm having a problems with my dog wanting to kill other dogs....well I guess I don't want my dog to feel the need to or be stressed by the desire to attack another dog. I had Rotties most of my life and DA was never a problem; when I got Athena she was a rescue and honestly I didn't really do much research....she was cute and needed a home and I gave her one. Had she been DA I would have dealt with it but luckily she wasn't.
I don't understand why DA isn't distasteful? DA isn't what makes the Pittie IMHO. I think it is a part of the breed but doesn't have to be. I think all the things you like about APBT can remain part of the breed and as long as we don't continue to breed for DA I think it will fade away.