actually, i did read the whole thing. its six pages of people ranting about stuff groomer have done. most of which have sounded like it was not only the groomers fault but the owners. and also, i mostly responded b/c people seem to think that they can tell people what to write on these sites when they cant.
and to be honest, sarah was stupid for taking her show quality dog to a pet groomer, and also stupid for not giving specific instructions. she said herself that she knew before she left her dog there that the groomer wasnt very good, that most in the area sucked. and again, people who show their dogs and do it right, do not let their dogs get into a state where the "urgently need to be groomed". doesnt happen, im sorry. she doesnt know what she is doing, and i have ever right to tell her that.
and i agree, not all groomers are great, which is a rule in any business. but who is worse, the people who do bad business, or the people stupid enough to take their business to that very person. none of these groomers would be around if people did some research and found out what to look for when taking your dog to the groomer, or to the vet, or the kennel, or the dog park. instead of creating a thread 6 pages long about how a groomer wronged you, why dont you take a step back from the situation and think how you can avoid it again.
and i do have a reason to defend those in this business. you people have no idea how hard it is to be a groomer, what we have to deal with in terms of dogs and customers. so to create a thread that only talks about your bad experiances is probably going to get any groomer who reads it to say something about how stupid it is