Teenage Big Game Hunter...

Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,681
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Fort McMurray, AB, CA
#21
I think the main issue for a lot of people is that she isn't sad or neutral about being up close with the animal's dead body, but looks quite happy and perhaps proud about it. If she had posted pictures of herself posing and smiling with her beef steer after it got the captive bolt... pretty sure people would think that was messed up too.
I find it no more odd then raising a calf to put in a show, knowing that whoever buys it is probably going to kill and eat it, but that's what 4-h is all about. Yet those kids pose with those calves, heck I have pictures of my uncles posing with theirs.
 

RBark

Got Floof?
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
961
Likes
0
Points
16
#22
Wow, yeah, I have a ton of pictures of me with dead animals. There's one of me holding like, 10 ducks that I shot down. Not to mention all the fish pictures.... I was pretty happy in all of them. Not because I killed them, but because I caught them.

Even the ones I release, I take a picture and then release them.
 

Xandra

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
3,806
Likes
0
Points
36
#23
Yeah just to clarify, I can understand happy/excited photos with the dead/tranquilized animal.

In the two discussions I've seen though, people seem to accept the conservation reasons for the animals being killed, but they think she shouldn't have wanted to do it or she should be sad/regretful/not wanting photos.

It's not the act so much as her perceived attitude that gets people. (From what I gather).
 

RBark

Got Floof?
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
961
Likes
0
Points
16
#24
Yeah just to clarify, I can understand happy/excited photos with the dead/tranquilized animal.

In the two discussions I've seen though, people seem to accept the conservation reasons for the animals being killed, but they think she shouldn't have wanted to do it or she should be sad/regretful/not wanting photos.

It's not the act so much as her perceived attitude that gets people. (From what I gather).
The same people post pictures of themselves at parties or family gatherings or Thanksgiving dinners with the butchered, boiled, set on fire carcasses of once living things smiling and celebrating and joyfully eating them.

People in general make crazy distinctions here. I'm aware that a fair amount of them are probably vegetarians, but rationally speaking they are a bunch of vegetable killers too! Poor plants.
 

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#25
Hey maybe that makes me a hypocrite but I am NOT going to sit around to pretend that a big part of this isn't because of the species she is posing next to.
To me a tiger,leopard etc.. > chicken/deer/turkey/fish
They are all animals but some I care about more than others. That's just the reality of the situation.

"Why are people so upset that they eat dogs in certain countries, pigs are as smart as dogs but we eat them!"
BECAUSE BECAUSE! Because it's an emotional, complex, social and cultural issue that isn't based on rationality or black/white.

(for the record I think posing next to an animal you just killed is always off-putting regardless of it's type, but that's heavily personal too)

Tigers (and the rest of the large game) are in many areas endangered, protected intelligent large beautiful creatures with family structures and disney movies and national geographic documentaries etc..etc..etc.. the idea that they are worth MORE and seeing one dead causes us to FEEL MORE is heavily socially engrained, again that's just a reality.

So if I (even rationally let's say the tiger was rampaging a town and they were over populated in that area and people were going to eat the meat) WAS the one designated to kill one I PERSONALLY would feel awful for doing so because it would be killing such a magnificent intelligent animal and especially bad because yes, I respect them more than I do a chicken or cow or other animals we routinely eat.
I can't imagine taking joy in killing ANY animal at my own hand, because I CERTAINLY wouldn't want a souvenir of it
Do I eat turkey at thanksgiving? Yup.
Do I see that animal alive at some farm, pick it out, shoot it and take a picture with it's dead body? NOPE.

It's not rational, AT ALL, and I don't make the claim that it is. My feelings are rarely rational.

Seeing these pictures make my stomach turn (hypocritically, even as someone who routinely eats meat), I wouldn't want to be friends with this girl, I think it's awful she finds pleasure in this.
That doesn't mean I believe she is an awful human being or her actions should be illegal.

It's also a reality that if I did have to hunt and kill my own meat, I'd very likely be a vegetarian lol
(although for the record I still don't think food can be "cruelty free" when it's farmed by exploited workers so....yea..it's kind of a tough time all around lol)
 

RBark

Got Floof?
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
961
Likes
0
Points
16
#26
Fran-

I don't think you're wrong. And my posts aren't meant to imply that. Like I said, personally I dislike the hunting of those sort of animals. I also agree that I'm a hundred times more likely to be OK with eating chicken or salmon than Lion or Shark.

I also wouldn't ever find myself hunting them for sport or photo op. Heck, not even to eat. As far as I'm concerned there's plenty of chicken, and yes I do value Lions more.

That being said, my comments just are in response to people saying she is a bad person, or doing something wrong. To use your own example, it'd be, to me, like saying that people who eat dogs are bad, horrible people. There's people in India thinking we're bad, horrible people for eating cows. Are either group wrong, or bad people? No, we just have different moral compasses.

We don't have to *like* what this person does, but demonizing her (and am not implying you did, I don't want to go back and read and don't really care whether you did or not, I'm just speaking in general) based on our own moral compass is rather unfair.
 

sillysally

Obey the Toad.
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
5,074
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
A hole in the bottom of the sea.
#27
If she was posing grinning ear to ear with arm loads if stray dogs and cats she killed I wonder what they reactions would be. I mean, they are overpopulated in many areas. Or if maybe she was out picking off Chincoteague ponies on the island...

Honestly, as far as the 4-H thing goes, I don't know many farm kids who take so much pleasure in killing the animals they raised, and I've been around lots of them. The attitude is more a "get it done" kind if thing.

I'd be curious to see how the money they pay is actually distributed and the actual data behind the claims she makes about the animals she's hunting.
 

RBark

Got Floof?
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
961
Likes
0
Points
16
#28
If she was posing grinning ear to ear with arm loads if stray dogs and cats she killed I wonder what they reactions would be. I mean, they are overpopulated in many areas. Or if maybe she was out picking off Chincoteague ponies on the island...

Honestly, as far as the 4-H thing goes, I don't know many farm kids who take so much pleasure in killing the animals they raised, and I've been around lots of them. The attitude is more a "get it done" kind if thing.

I'd be curious to see how the money they pay is actually distributed and the actual data behind the claims she makes about the animals she's hunting.
In America, people would be horrified and disgusted. I would be too. In other countries they'd say "good riddance to the nuisances". Who's to say which is right? It's wrong to me so I don't do it. Here in America where a lot of roaming animals may be someone's pet, it's wrong to do it in this country. Not to mention there are plenty of other options that it's not necessary to begin with.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#29
If we didn't judge using our own moral compass, imagine what the world would be like. Anything would go! That's why we have a moral compass to begin with!

Like I said earlier.... Hunting is one thing. Hunting a trophy is another. I'm pretty sure people have hunted for other humans in history. Maybe those people who have committed crimes (and again, some countries you can be stoned for adultery... If we are thinking about moral compasses!!)

I don't think the "I do because I can" is necessarily good enough reason to do something all the time.

She did it because she can. I could too... I could pay to hunt a human if I really wanted to I'm sure... Just because I can, doesn't mean I should! There has to be lines in the sand somewhere. We aren't all going to agree where though.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#30
And while we are at it.... I'd rather see a local hunter paid to manage the populations of animals in their own county where money is few and far between.

I very, very much doubt the money filters down to the villagers. But if anyone has any info that says contrary I'd buy it I'm sure....
 

RBark

Got Floof?
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
961
Likes
0
Points
16
#31
That's not really true. Judging in a situation where hypocrisy is abundantly clear is not the same as judging where absolutes do exist.

Hunting an human is never okay, because it infringes on that person's rights.

Criticizing people for killing chickens while eating chicken? Yeah the person doesn't really have any grounds to judge.

Recognizing that is necessary, otherwise you could make the argument that, for the sake of comparison, it's okay for one group of people to forbid another group of people to marry because it doesn't agree with their morals. Or it's okay for people to forbid us from eating pork/cow/whatever.

And while we are at it.... I'd rather see a local hunter paid to manage the populations of animals in their own county where money is few and far between.

I very, very much doubt the money filters down to the villagers. But if anyone has any info that says contrary I'd buy it I'm sure....
That, I do agree with.
 

Xandra

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
3,806
Likes
0
Points
36
#32
IIRC this girl is hunting on a reserve in South Africa, which probably means a very large but fenced area. I don't know about money going to villagers; they get tourism and food. The money would go to the landowner (and maybe the government), who would put it towards anti-poaching efforts and game management. I believe the rhino in the pic is tranquilized for veterinary care after being attacked by lions. They kind of stuff costs money, as do anti-poaching efforts. I know in some places they actually bring in ex-military from the USA and UK.

http://www.savetherhino.org/rhino_info/thorny_issues/trophy_hunting
How does trophy hunting benefit rhino conservation?

At the turn of the century, only around 50-100 white rhino remained in South Africa and urgent conservation action, including the involvement of private landowners, was taken to save this species from the brink of extinction. Since 1968, South Africa has permitted the limited hunting of Southern white rhino and data from the IUCN African Rhino Specialist Group shows that since hunting began, the numbers of Southern white rhino have increased from 1,800 to over 20,000.

Rhinos in the DRCBy allowing private landowners to conduct limited trophy hunting of rhinos, this helped give white rhinos an economic value and allowed private landowners and communities to benefit from having rhinos on their land. It became an incentive to own rhinos. Currently almost 25% of Africa’s rhinos are privately owned.

Many National Parks have reached their carrying capacity for rhino populations. Private landowners and community land are important in providing habitat space to host and expand rhino populations. To do this, they need to receive income and derive a benefit from having wildlife on their land.

The current rhino poaching crisis is rapidly escalating, with over 946 rhinos killed in South Africa in 2013 as at 19 December. The increasingly high prices fetched for rhino horn on the black market mean that ruthless criminal syndicates are heavily involved in rhino poaching. Unfortunately, this means that it is becoming increasingly expensive for both state and private landowners to protect their rhinos from poaching; huge sums of money are needed for intensive anti-poaching and monitoring patrols, including ranger salaries, technology such as micro-chips and drones and transport such as helicopters and vehicles. In fact, several private landowners in South Africa are considering disinvesting in rhinos, as they can no longer afford the cost of protecting them.
I am definitely "speciesist," I don't mind seeing a deer killed but I don't like to think of lions being killed (I said as much in the wild animal buffet thread.. it's the king of beasts!!). At the same time I recognize that killing a "surplus" lion is no more wrong than killing a "surplus" deer. There is a difference between feelings and rational thinking and when making serious judgments about people or situations I definitely believe in striving to be fair and consistent instead of relying on knee-jerk reaction.

What makes me sick is when people think their feelings are more important than conservation efforts, like with the exotic animal hunts in Texas. If hunting is how desperately-needed money is entering the system then be happy that there are people who enjoy hunting.
 
Last edited:

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#33
And while we are at it.... I'd rather see a local hunter paid to manage the populations of animals in their own county where money is few and far between.

I very, very much doubt the money filters down to the villagers. But if anyone has any info that says contrary I'd buy it I'm sure....
This type of "hunting" isn't something I personally want to be involved with or like, but I have family members who have gone on African safari hunts like this.

My aunt shot a zebra and now has a zebra rug. They prepared the best cut for her to eat at the place, and the rest of the zebra meat went to the local village for people to eat. My uncle shot some water buffalo and different gazelles. Same thing.

Without hunting preserves, you have incredibly poor communities of people without a lot of resources. The temptation to become poachers is really strong. If you can kill an elephant, cut off its tusks, and feed your family for 6 months is there really much of a decision to make?

There's also the option of them killing off/driving away all the native animals, especially lions and other predators, so that they can raise cattle instead. Because people got to eat.

With hunting preserves they can maintain populations of native species, including predators, because they're getting money from maintaining the preserve. Instead of becoming poachers, the wildlife is an asset to protect and they can get jobs as hunting guides, or protecting the animals from poachers.

And when the herd is being professionally managed, they can select which animals are "harvested" and which are left. I saw an article about a huge male rhino someone paid a lot of money to kill as a trophy. People freaked out about it, but the rhino had gotten really aggressive and actually killed other rhinos, including a pregnant female. It was better for the health of the herd for him to be killed. And since someone was wiling to pay a lot of money to do it legally, that benefited the local economy a lot more than paying money to a local hunter to do it.

As far as them being threatened, legalized regulated hunting actually helps tremendously in species recovery. It opens up vast swaths of private land as viable habitat where they will be protected from poachers. When hunting of white rhinos was legalized there was a dramatic jump in population.

Is there such evidence? According to a 2005 paper by Nigel Leader-Williams and colleagues in the Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy the answer is yes. Leader-Williams describes how the legalization of white rhinoceros hunting in South Africa motivated private landowners to reintroduce the species onto their lands. As a result, the country saw an increase in white rhinos from fewer than one hundred individuals to more than 11,000, even while a limited number were killed as trophies.
http://conservationmagazine.org/2014/01/can-trophy-hunting-reconciled-conservation/
 

meepitsmeagan

Meagan & The Cattle Dog Crew
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
3,378
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Michigan
#34
Like I said earlier.... Hunting is one thing. Hunting a trophy is another.
I disagree. My husband is an avid hunter of whitetail deer and waterfowl. The deer population here is terrible. They wreak havoc on our crops and are just out of control. He hunts for meat to feed our family, but he definitely hunts for the largest buck he can find! Everything is legal and he shoots a handful of nice does and normally uses both of his buck tags. It would be weird if he just shot immature bucks willynilly. Mature bucks are very smart and are difficult to hunt. It takes a lot of time and planning. Not only that, iirc they will mate more frequently than immature boys.

Waterfowl are different as size isn't a big issue with them. It's more can you reach bag limit. Turkey, yeah. They try to get the longest beard and spurs they can. Still good eating!

You bet we take photos of them and you bet they end up on the wall. It's norm here.

I don't like reserve hunts.. I think that true hunting is done with a completely wild animal who is not overly comfortable with the human race. I don't think what this gal is doing is WRONG, but I don't necessarily like it just because it doesn't seem like the hunt is in the animals favor.
 

CharlieDog

Rude and Not Ginger
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
9,419
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Georgia
#35
I understand the "joy" in hunting. I'm not sure how this girl hunts, but when I hunt, I stalk my deer (all I've ever hunted) and the deer has every chance to get away. They're wild, they're over populated, and we eat what I kill.

It's the thrill of the chase, the chance that the "prey" might outsmart you and get away (it happens ALL the time. Never did get this buck I was hunting.) And yes, every time I make a kill, I thank the animal for giving it's life to feed my family. I got two deer last year. They've feed us and kept us from having to buy store bought beef for nearly a year. If I'd gotten the last deer I saw (she saw me too, and got away. I never shoot unless I'm sure of my shot) then we wouldn't have to buy any red meat at all. As it is, the meat we have left might make it until next hunting season, but I won't be here.

I always feel a mixture of I guess pride, and sorrow. I've killed a beautiful creature. But I'm feeding my family. I outsmarted an animal who is perfectly capable of outsmarting me, outrunning me, out hiding me. So to be proud of that isn't a sin.

I know people who refuse to believe any sort of hunting is okay. I also know people who would rather starve than live off of hunted meat. All I know is that if something happened, I would be able to hunt and provide for my family.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,681
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Fort McMurray, AB, CA
#36
I think it's cute how people think stopping her specifically from hunting is going to save the African animals, lmao, do they really think she is the only one going and doing this?
 

HayleyMarie

Like a bat outa' hell
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
7,058
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Beautiful British Columbia!!
#37
I understand the "joy" in hunting. I'm not sure how this girl hunts, but when I hunt, I stalk my deer (all I've ever hunted) and the deer has every chance to get away. They're wild, they're over populated, and we eat what I kill.

It's the thrill of the chase, the chance that the "prey" might outsmart you and get away (it happens ALL the time. Never did get this buck I was hunting.) And yes, every time I make a kill, I thank the animal for giving it's life to feed my family. I got two deer last year. They've feed us and kept us from having to buy store bought beef for nearly a year. If I'd gotten the last deer I saw (she saw me too, and got away. I never shoot unless I'm sure of my shot) then we wouldn't have to buy any red meat at all. As it is, the meat we have left might make it until next hunting season, but I won't be here.

I always feel a mixture of I guess pride, and sorrow. I've killed a beautiful creature. But I'm feeding my family. I outsmarted an animal who is perfectly capable of outsmarting me, outrunning me, out hiding me. So to be proud of that isn't a sin.

I know people who refuse to believe any sort of hunting is okay. I also know people who would rather starve than live off of hunted meat. All I know is that if something happened, I would be able to hunt and provide for my family.
THIS^^^ 100% and then some. We hunt and honestly is something that Tyler and I enjoy doing together. We never waste what we hunt and everything we don't or can't eat goes to the dogs.

In saying that I do know people who trophy hunt, they only go for the biggest buck or whatever animal they are hunting, but they also use all the meat, even if that means they have to turn all the meat in to hamburger because the animal was so old.
 

milos_mommy

Active Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
15,349
Likes
0
Points
36
#38
I think people who judge this girl for the most part have no idea what they're talking about, honestly.

I think it's fine. Maybe not the wisest decision to publicize a photo like that, but in that situation I might want to share with my family and friends. (I most likely wouldn't personally kill a lion ever, because of the cultural reasons mentioned previously in this thread. I'm not really a big-game-hunter type...I might kill a deer or cattle for food but I think I'd mainly stick to stuff I could beat in hand to hand combat).

Also, I'd feel better about eating that lion than some supermarket chop meat. Happy wild free lion that roamed blissfully ruling the savannah, and not a cow that lived in its own filth shot up with steroids and drugs til it got tortured to death.

On the other hand, I bet the lion's family was very sad. Wild turkey families don't really mourn their losses.
 

sillysally

Obey the Toad.
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
5,074
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
A hole in the bottom of the sea.
#39
IIRC this girl is hunting on a reserve in South Africa, which probably means a very large but fenced area. I don't know about money going to villagers; they get tourism and food. The money would go to the landowner (and maybe the government), who would put it towards anti-poaching efforts and game management. I believe the rhino in the pic is tranquilized for veterinary care after being attacked by lions. They kind of stuff costs money, as do anti-poaching efforts. I know in some places they actually bring in ex-military from the USA and UK.

http://www.savetherhino.org/rhino_info/thorny_issues/trophy_hunting


I am definitely "speciesist," I don't mind seeing a deer killed but I don't like to think of lions being killed (I said as much in the wild animal buffet thread.. it's the king of beasts!!). At the same time I recognize that killing a "surplus" lion is no more wrong than killing a "surplus" deer. There is a difference between feelings and rational thinking and when making serious judgments about people or situations I definitely believe in striving to be fair and consistent instead of relying on knee-jerk reaction.

What makes me sick is when people think their feelings are more important than conservation efforts, like with the exotic animal hunts in Texas. If hunting is how desperately-needed money is entering the system then be happy that there are people who enjoy hunting.
Than you for posting that-it's definately a complex issue: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/should-trophy-hunting-of-lions-be-banned-155657735/

I guess I was born without the hunting gene--more of a gatherer maybe? I would be fine with DH hunting deer for food (and have encouraged it, although he's just not that outdoorsie), and I'm fine with people killing highly populated nuisance animals like raccoons and wild hogs.

I used to work cleaning houses with a woman who deer hunted. We worked in a area with a lot of deer and one day we were cleaning a bedroom, looked out the window and saw a pair of deer grazing in the yard. This woman went on and on for minutes about how beautiful the deer were, and then went on to say how she wished she had her rifle with her right then. I just don't get that. It doesn't mean that I think people who hunt are bad, or that this young woman deserves death threats, but killing something you admire and find beautiful and majestic and then being thrilled and proud of it is something I just can't wrap my mind around. *puts flame suit on*
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#40
I used to work cleaning houses with a woman who deer hunted. We worked in a area with a lot of deer and one day we were cleaning a bedroom, looked out the window and saw a pair of deer grazing in the yard. This woman went on and on for minutes about how beautiful the deer were, and then went on to say how she wished she had her rifle with her right then. I just don't get that. It doesn't mean that I think people who hunt are bad, or that this young woman deserves death threats, but killing something you admire and find beautiful and majestic and then being thrilled and proud of it is something I just can't wrap my mind around. *puts flame suit on*
I'm not sure the answer to that exactly, but for a bit of perspective I do plan to small time hobby farm and raise meat for my family some day.

Now, do I want to raise animals I find ugly and dislike? No, not really. Instead of creepy california rabbits with their weird red eyes, I plan to raise silver fox rabbits and champagne d'argent, maybe standard rex. Why? I think they're beautiful. I also love eating bunny and look forward to having a steady supply of healthy home raised meat for my family.

Same thing with fish. Instead of raising catfish, I'd like to be set up for trout. Trout are prettier. I think they taste better, and I'd probably enjoy raising them more than catfish.

And sheep. I love lamb. I don't like the look of fleece breeds. I want hair sheep, specifically painted desert sheep because they are gorgeous and have cool horns. But I still look forward to eating them.

Weirdly enough, I LOVE bacon but have a very strong dislike of live pigs. I really would rather not raise a pig. If I can get away with it, I'd totally trade with someone else for home raised bacon.
Maybe it's coming from the same place as your boss?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top