One Method Training

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
i didn't want to look like i was having a go at anyone, just to prove i wasn't misreading posts and bring up where i may have been mislead as to people's opinions. :)
I wouldn't have looked that way at all. I just have an idea how most of the people here feel about physical punishment on both sides and I wonder if that wasn't someone, possibly new to dogdom or training who's just honestly confused by what aversives are.

If that was the case, the example would not really be representative of the people you were trying to address.

Quotes are valuable, more so if you know where they came from.:)
 

IliamnasQuest

Loves off-leash training!
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
1,083
Likes
0
Points
0
When someone has a hard time getting their dog to come when it's wanting in the worst way to run off and chase prey and has such a drive that way, that the recall is hard to get reliable, there are some specific exercises that can help with that....geared for that very type of competing motivator. There's a system, step by step that works up by levels. When someone just goes and uses a shock collar, it bothers me because I don't think they're nice at all. When someone says that they gave treats and ear scratches for 20 months and the dog still didn't have a good recall, I say, "elementary" because there is lots more you can do besides praise and treats and it's not all about reward. It's about setting up situations and a whole lot more. When that someone says that she was just summarizing and she did do more, but only wrote ear scratches and treats, how is the reader suppose to know that she did more? It looks like, when you read the post that that was the only method employed. So, to me, that is very basic and not enough to train a good recall in prey distractions. It is not meant to be condenscending. It was that I was aghast that a trainer, no less would think that was the only trick in the bag. I cringe at the thought of shock collars and I can't help that.
But....never mind.
Oh geez .. "when someone" ?? Are you trying to be elusive? *LOL* So tell me .. when you talk about training you've done, do you write out every little thing you've done for a year and a half of training? No, of course not. You summarize. But when I do it, you use it just so you can throw an insult at me.

I am pretty darn sure that I have a lot more experience in training than you do. I understand dog behavior very well and have no doubt that I also understand the concepts of operant conditioning better than you do (given some of your very statements in the past). And I live in the real world, where dogs play rough games with each other and have predictable responses to certain aversives. I have ZERO doubt (in my experience based on 18 years of training seriously) that I provided my dog with the proper training and motivation throughout those 18 months before I bought an e-collar. Do I feel the need to tell you every single thing I did for 18 months of training? No, I don't. There is NOTHING that I've seen you post EVER that makes me think that you would have done more than I did with this girl. NOTHING. Not once have a read a post from you that made me go "a-HA! There's a step I missed that I could try!". There's not been one post from your buddy, either, that made me sit up and think "wow, this person really does have some better ideas!". Believe me, if either of you had offered something that I hadn't already thought of I would have gladly used it. But there has not been ONE thing in ... what, well over a year? .. of posts on this forum.

The level of severity of a correction or an aversive or a NRM depends on the DOG, not on the PERSON. A simple neutral "no" could flatten some dogs I've worked with, whereas a hugely physical correction could be completely shrugged off by others. Knowledgeable trainers understand this. It's extremely obvious that I won't get some "trainers" on here to accept this. So all I can do is continue to let people know that regardless of what some people want to say, use of an occasional aversion - based on the personality of their particular dog and balanced with a huge amount of positive reinforcement - is NOT a bad thing. They are NOT bad people for doing this and no reasonable person should make them feel so.

I've explained things over and over and over and I'm done explaining my techniques for now. I'm not done defending other people, though. Someone needs to do it, because it's obvious that the guilt trips being thrown at them are detrimental.

And by the way - whatzmatter was dead on about the PM's. I get messages from people frequently (PM's and emails) thanking me for my posts AND asking my advice on training. Some of these people are no longer comfortable asking in public because they are concerned they'll be treated badly. And it is just amazing that the "trainers" on here who profess to believe so highly in positive reinforcement are so inept at providing +R to those who ask for advice. Look at the number of public posts that have said "yes, I was made to feel bad". Imagine how many more of those responses are going privately to various people, and how many more people are sitting back thinking "yes, I feel the same". The truth is, you're NOT helping people and you're NOT helping their dogs when you make them feel like they're terrible.

Melanie and the gang in Alaska
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
That's how it is on this forum now, you disagree with the "purely positive" you get bashed or banned now (seeing as the moderators are non- harsh aversive trainers) apparently for having a different view or method.

It's one thing to have differing opinions, but that's not what goes on in this forum, it's right out bashing, throwing insults like dog abuse and whatever else.

It just must be this forum, because there are others I frequent that have differing opinions, but their moderators don't bash or belittle members who use "harsh" aversives in training.

It's funny, because awhile back I posted about a wonderful score at a correction match with Roxy, major improvements with her SFE and the thread got absolutely no replies!! I wonder why... trully I don't. It's best for those against the methods I use with my dog to ignore the fact that the methods they're so dead against actually had positive outcomes with my dog.

It's one thing to disagree, but another to disagree than ignore anything stated that is a positive from the differing method. And totally useless to state that "you could've done it better and with no harsh aversives".

Seeing as I have no issues with housetraining or normal "pet" issues, I tend to take more to heart from people who actually work in the sports we're working towards.

To me seeing a post from someone with years of experience, and over two dozen titles on dogs holds more weight than someone who's read a few books or some web pages on the internet. Not to say that there isn't good information on the internet of course, rather if I had to choose a doctor, and my choices were 1) has had a practice for over a decade or 2) Someone who's read some medical books, my hands down choice would clearly be 1.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
Roxy, is this all you have to contribute? Just so you know, I've read many, many of your posts from other forums too and it seems you have your share of disagreements where ever you go. I suggest if you find this one so distasteful, you just don't move along.:mad:

Did you ever consider that you got no replies on your post simply because you only come here to do what you just did and have consequently lost some interest in your posts. Food for thought.

Thanks for the contribution....very helpful as usual.
 
Last edited:

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
It would be interesting to know which threads or boards your talking about, I feel awfully special to have a stalker :) To my knowledge, one of the only arguements I've had on another board was actually about the use of e-collars! And it was AGAINST the use of e-collars as a primary training method. Wowzers! Is that what your talking about?!?! If so, wonderful how you left THAT part out!

Actually, the specific thread I'm talking about was long before I decided this board was too one sided, so nope, that couldn't be the answer. I know why, we all know why, if you choose to post that that's the reason and tell yourself that, it's okay with me :)

And surprise, surprise, an "Infraction"?

What exactly was so wrong with my post dr2little? Did I call someone a name? Was I belittling someone? I just re-read it and I don't see anything worse than some of the things you post personally. I'm trully confused, not really surprised though.

For someone who deals with people on a regular basis, teaching and educating about dogs, I think your moderator status has gone to your head.

Your posts used to seriously lack the edginess they now contain. I KNOW many who join and end up leaving without posting because of the negativity on this board, finding help on other boards with varying methods but no hostility.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
No one board is going to be all things to all people. Some are going to love it here; some like it; some be indifferent; some dislike and some downright hate it. Nothing is all things to all people.

This is an issue that's never going to be agreed upon and there's really no point in rehashing the same things over and over and over again here and then dragging them out and flogging each other with them.

Maybe the next time this sort of subject comes up it would be a good idea to come to an agreement on the definitions of the terminology used before everyone starts in on the principles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Top