Did I not say this was likely to be the next step?
- Thread starter Zoom
- Start date
Sorry. No. I do not need someone to come along trolling to understand what a piece of excrement this proposed law and the people supporting it are. They're doing a good enough job themselves. That's like saying we need trolls supporting the Westboro Baptist Church to "get" that they are idiots. We don't. To suggest otherwise is a total insult to our intelligence.
:rofl1:
That does sound like him.
And good god, you people are far, far, far too easy to troll. My avatar is the troll face, for christ's sake! I merely had play devil's advocate and got way too big of a rise out of a few of you. Some people will have differing opinions in life than you, and they will argue those beliefs fervently; you shouldn't get emotional and go DEFCON 1 on them just because you disagree. In summary:
That does sound like him.
And good god, you people are far, far, far too easy to troll. My avatar is the troll face, for christ's sake! I merely had play devil's advocate and got way too big of a rise out of a few of you. Some people will have differing opinions in life than you, and they will argue those beliefs fervently; you shouldn't get emotional and go DEFCON 1 on them just because you disagree. In summary:
:rofl1:
That does sound like him.
And good god, you people are far, far, far too easy to troll. My avatar is the troll face, for christ's sake! I merely had play devil's advocate and got way too big of a rise out of a few of you. Some people will have differing opinions in life than you, and they will argue those beliefs fervently; you shouldn't get emotional and go DEFCON 1 on them just because you disagree. In summary:
That does sound like him.
And good god, you people are far, far, far too easy to troll. My avatar is the troll face, for christ's sake! I merely had play devil's advocate and got way too big of a rise out of a few of you. Some people will have differing opinions in life than you, and they will argue those beliefs fervently; you shouldn't get emotional and go DEFCON 1 on them just because you disagree. In summary:
OH! Here it is! YouTube - Holy Grail - Killer Bunny
Run away, run away little troll, err, I mean "advocate."
If it makes you feel any better, yes, you are annoying. You remind me a great deal of a 5 year old I used to get stuck babysitting because no one could stand him.
I think I posted before reading Lilvalti's warning that you were being a troll.
But having said that, just as much as you expect us to be aware that you were playing devil's advocate, you should have expected this type of reaction from some.
Some subjects are sensitive for some people. And you intentionally struck a chord with some folks ESPECIALLY since you're expressing a non-position (or at least trying to come off that way) on the matter.
Don't cry "Butt Sore" on some of those in this thread when you're intentionally behaving in a way that is going to cause this kind of reaction.
You don't get to do that. I mean, really.
That's like antagonizing someone and then crying that you did NOTHING when they punch you in the face.
Cause, you know, in the words I tell my pups just about every day, "I give you the beats up."
And I would. Had I participated further in this thread. At least the e-version.
But having said that, just as much as you expect us to be aware that you were playing devil's advocate, you should have expected this type of reaction from some.
Some subjects are sensitive for some people. And you intentionally struck a chord with some folks ESPECIALLY since you're expressing a non-position (or at least trying to come off that way) on the matter.
Don't cry "Butt Sore" on some of those in this thread when you're intentionally behaving in a way that is going to cause this kind of reaction.
You don't get to do that. I mean, really.
That's like antagonizing someone and then crying that you did NOTHING when they punch you in the face.
Cause, you know, in the words I tell my pups just about every day, "I give you the beats up."
And I would. Had I participated further in this thread. At least the e-version.
Sorry, but if this wasn't zoom's Bro the **** stirring would not be looked at so lightly.
Aren't there rules against trolling? It's one thing to make people see things from another perspective. It's quite another to openly mock people then say its why you even reply.
I've seen people banned for less.
Aren't there rules against trolling? It's one thing to make people see things from another perspective. It's quite another to openly mock people then say its why you even reply.
I've seen people banned for less.
Bottom line is yes, you were trolling, that's mainly what you do; I don't know why other than possibly it makes you feel all badass johnson to come into your sister's domain and try to embarrass her by being a douche, but you don't even have the nads to own your trollery and run away to hide behind the "devil's advocate" bullshit.
Even if you ever do have an opinion worthy of consideration it won't get any because you've not given anyone any reason to have a shred of respect for anything you might have to say.
Grow up and stop being quite so pathetic.
Oh, and none of us holds Zoom even remotely accountable for you. We don't even think you could possibly share any DNA with her. Must have been an unfortunate switch at the OB ward that last time.
Even if you ever do have an opinion worthy of consideration it won't get any because you've not given anyone any reason to have a shred of respect for anything you might have to say.
Grow up and stop being quite so pathetic.
Oh, and none of us holds Zoom even remotely accountable for you. We don't even think you could possibly share any DNA with her. Must have been an unfortunate switch at the OB ward that last time.
I have to say that even if someone wants to play "devil's advocate'--it can be done is a way that is respectful to others. Learning some tact for dealing with others would do you some good Neo. And I am certain you could care less about my thoughts on this--but seriously, if you want to play bad ass--then take it to a forum that appreciates that form of communication.
Necho being my brother has nothing to do with this "being looked upon lightly". I've been texting him, I don't know if anyone else has been talking with him or not. There are plenty of people on this forum that have taken a similar stance in a slightly less "hot button topic" thread and have never garnered a ban yet. Was all this is less than good taste? Of course. But was he entirely wrong in what he posted, as far a logic goes? We know there are others out there who truly hold those views, otherwise this article wouldn't have been written in the first place.
This wasn't like some random person coming in and saying "LAWLZ ALL UR UTERUSES ARE BELONG TO US". He was actually presenting logical (in the formal sense) arguments, the expansion of rationale and themes, as distasteful as they seem to our majority. Our majority is also made up of women, many (if not most) of whom have at least one child or are attempting to have a family. It's an emotionally hot-button topic and it was argued in sheer emotions, which doesn't go very far outside of an insular environment such as Chaz. It's like when we all agree on the type and quality of dog food/raw to feed, yet if you set foot on other forums or out in Petsmart, you're going to be arguing until your face is blue and you've run out of breath as to why Food A is so much better than Food B if you can't present things in a logical manner. I'm running into this at the pet food store; I've gotten so used to people thinking a specific way on dog food that when someone comes in and says "I feed Beneful and I'm not going to change, I just need something to make my dog quit [insert something that would be easily fixed by switching to a better food], you're not going to win anyone over by wailing "you're killing your dog!"
This wasn't like some random person coming in and saying "LAWLZ ALL UR UTERUSES ARE BELONG TO US". He was actually presenting logical (in the formal sense) arguments, the expansion of rationale and themes, as distasteful as they seem to our majority. Our majority is also made up of women, many (if not most) of whom have at least one child or are attempting to have a family. It's an emotionally hot-button topic and it was argued in sheer emotions, which doesn't go very far outside of an insular environment such as Chaz. It's like when we all agree on the type and quality of dog food/raw to feed, yet if you set foot on other forums or out in Petsmart, you're going to be arguing until your face is blue and you've run out of breath as to why Food A is so much better than Food B if you can't present things in a logical manner. I'm running into this at the pet food store; I've gotten so used to people thinking a specific way on dog food that when someone comes in and says "I feed Beneful and I'm not going to change, I just need something to make my dog quit [insert something that would be easily fixed by switching to a better food], you're not going to win anyone over by wailing "you're killing your dog!"