Breeds with the MOST significant difference between show and working lines?

lancerandrara

Sports Lunatic
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
675
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles, CA
#21
In comaprison to the 2014 Westminster BOB Lab, this is the 2015 Westminster BOB.
http://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/2015/photos/breed/SR73715301.html
Well, that looks much nicer to me!


If we're talking herding dogs (excluding continentals/tenders) I think I've seen the largest gulf between working and conformation Aussies.
I think Aussies have quite a lot of overlap, actually! Not necessarily in appearance, which even still look relatively similar to me, but in herding and working ability. A lot of showline Aussies work with stock and trial, excel in a wide variety of sports. Good showline Aussies generally have multiple working/sport titles in their names. Looking at our own Keechak/Erin Fleming on chaz has Aussies of this type, from show and working stock. Of course, there are extremes of both ends, but the breed as a whole has a lot of overlap.

I remember someone mentioning that ASCA number one bitch 2009 and 2010 comes from successful showlines. She also has multiple ranch titles.
 
Last edited:

MicksMom

Active Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
3,978
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Warren Co, NJ
#23
...
In comaprison to the 2014 Westminster BOB Lab, this is the 2015 Westminster BOB.
http://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/2015/photos/breed/SR73715301.html

...Well, that looks much nicer to me!...
Me, too. I have to go back and look, but I'm wondering if the 2014 dog was older, and thus filled out more. If I remember correctly, there was lots of "chatter" about how heavy all the Labs looked that year. There was also a trend, for awhile, where young dogs were looking like fully matured dogs, which led to what I refer to as whiskey barrels on legs when they did mature.
 

SpringerLover

Active Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
3,415
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
B-ville
#24
I was reading an article about the topic of different lines, and they used the ESS as an example of how British and American bench dogs are actually very similar. Obviously the typical coat pattern is different, but they said otherwise the dogs were basically the same. I don't really see it ... they look pretty different to me in head shape especially. Wish I remember where I read that.
The thing that stands out to me as the biggest difference between American and British show is temperament (though I agree they don't look similar to me...). I have met multiple British show females (no males yet) and they are just more thoughtful, less neurotic, and bolder. I know the two I've met are a very small sample but people I talk to say the same stuff. They are just different, in a good way.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
103
Likes
0
Points
16
#25
Well, that looks much nicer to me!




I think Aussies have quite a lot of overlap, actually! Not necessarily in appearance, which even still look relatively similar to me, but in herding and working ability. A lot of showline Aussies work with stock and trial, excel in a wide variety of sports. Good showline Aussies generally have multiple working/sport titles in their names. Looking at our own Keechak/Erin Fleming on chaz has Aussies of this type, from show and working stock. Of course, there are extremes of both ends, but the breed as a whole has a lot of overlap.

I remember someone mentioning that ASCA number one bitch 2009 and 2010 comes from successful showlines. She also has multiple ranch titles.

I'll take your word for it! A lot of my opinion there comes from conversations with people for whom stock trial placement doesn't count for much in terms of gauging working ability (though I think that perspective has some flaws of its own) and what's seemed to me to be physical differences between show line dogs and working line dogs that are almost a more dramatic version of the differences between show line and working line BCs. Quite a few working Aussies I know are closer to BCs in overall body type than to what I perceive to be the average show line Aussie, whereas BCs all look like BCs to me. :)
 

FG167

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
2,709
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Jefferson, GA
#26
GSDs for sure....

This is an American Showline


This is a West German Showline


We have Working line dogs. The way you stack a dog can make them more or less extreme, so that is not the only way to tell "type". Temperaments, drive, and working ability are wildly different between the three.

Here is my dog (he's a longcoat), in a stack, free standing, and a bit stretched. Look at the difference in his topline...that is just due to stacking. He normally looks "straight backed".
2015-05-19, Kastle 4 Years Stacked Shot by Falon Gray Markow, on Flickr

2014-01-24, Kastle F2P-2 by Falon Gray Markow, on Flickr

2014-02-13, Dogs Ice Day-51 by Falon Gray Markow, on Flickr
 

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#28
Border Collies. You couldn't pay me to have a show line one and I would love a bunch more working lines.
Same for the Kelpie.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
4,381
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Midwest
#29
Generally speaking, there are vast differences in terms of appearance and the mental make up of showline and working line GSD's. I've seen good and bad in both, but overall I can't hardly consider them the same breed.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top