Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > Dog News and Articles


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2008, 11:56 AM
Sweet72947's Avatar
Sweet72947 Sweet72947 is offline
Squishy face
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 9,102
Default Vote NO - Chicago spay/neuter legislation

Link to poll: Vote no, delete cookies, refresh browser, repeat.
http://tinyurl.com/6bdjva


Quote:
HSUS Weighs in on Chicago Mandatory Spay/Castrate



On July 29, Ald. Edward M. Burke (14th) and Ald. Virginia A. Rugai (19th)
presented their draft mandatory spay/castrate ordinance to Chicago’s Joint
Committee on Finance and License and Consumer Protection. The ordinance would
require all cats and dogs be spay/castrated at the age of six months. The
ordinance contains an option for a breeding permit which allows only one litter
per year if the litter is registered with a registry approved by the City
commission. The ordinance also requires applicants for breeding permits to
undergo criminal background checks.



The distorted reasoning for this ordinance, as stated by Ald. Burke, is that
the ordinance will increase public safety by targeting gangs and others that
keep unsterilized dogs. It is beyond reason to think that anyone who
engages in dog fighting, which is already a felony under Illinois state law, will
obey a newly enacted spay/castration ordinance or submit to background checks
to apply for a breeding permit.



All that this ordinance can possibly accomplish is to create a potential new
class of criminals--responsi ble dog owners and breeders, who choose not to
spay or castrate their dogs, as well as waste a lot of Chicago taxpayers’ money
in investigation and enforcement of a useless ordinance.



Apparently, the Humane Society of the United States doesn’t agree.



On July 30, HSUS issued a press release via their website in support of the
proposed mandatory spay/castrate ordinance and thanked Chicago lawmakers for “
addressing this important animal welfare issue.” The statement reads, “
Every year, more than 3 million dogs and cats are euthanized in animal shelters
nationwide-includin g 19,000 pets in the City of Chicago-because not enough
people choose to adopt. Spaying and neutering, at this time, is the only
permanent, 100-percent effective method of birth control for dogs and cats, and
this legislation provides an incentive for people to sterilize their animals and
reorients public policy to expect that animal caretakers will see that their
animals are sterilized.”



With the same tired language used repeatedly by animal rights zealots, HSUS
downplays the potential impact of the ordinance by stating, “It is simply
wrong to refer to this ordinance as simply a "mandatory spay and neuter measure"
because it does allow responsible pet owners to opt out of spay or neuter for
their animals for numerous reasons. Under this legislation, people who elect
not to spay or neuter their animals in order to breed their dog or cat must
pay a permit fee. In that sense, this legislation provides incentives for
people to spay and neuter, and it amounts to something of a differential license
fee for people who do not want to spay or neuter their animals.”

http://www.hsus.org/press_ and_publi...e _073008.html



Let’s look at what the ordinance really means. First, if sterilization is
required, then by definition it is mandatory regardless of exemptions which
are only as good as the paper they are written on; exemptions can be removed
at any time. Second, what registries (if any) will be approved and by what
method remains unclear. Third, Chicago Animal Shelter Alliance reports,
"Between 2003 and 2005 overall citywide euthanasia rates dropped 12% and shelter
intake went down to 11%. With an overall shelter killing rate per 1,000 humans
at a historic low of 6.9%, Denver remains the only city between the coasts
with a lower kill rate (5.9%)." In recent years, Chicago already has seen
greatly reduced numbers of cats and dogs euthanized in its shelters on a yearly
basis without mandatory spay/neuter.

Source: http://www.anticruelty.org/site/epage/42566_ 576.htm




Additionally, let us not pretend that "neutering" is a benign surgery. What
HSUS (and other animal rightist activists) call "neutering" is, plain and
simple, castration, specifically the gonadectomy of males, meaning surgical
removal of the testicles, and the ovariohysterectomy of females, meaning
surgical removal of the ovaries and uterus. In other words, nothing
trivial--nothing most people would want forced on themselves.



Above all, has there *ever* been any doubt that mandatory spay/castration is
NOT about the well-being of animals, but an agenda to end breeding of
domesticated dogs and cats?



HSUS makes their position pretty clear in Chicago that a good dog is a
sterile dog. The tired overpopulation argument is told again in order to pass
punitive legislation to cripple breeders, blaming them for contributing to
shelter statistics. Yet on their web page for adopting pets HSUS states: “[In
fact,] most animals are given to shelters because of "people reasons," not
because of anything they've done. Things like a divorce, a move, lack of time or
financial constraints are among the most common reasons why pets lose their
homes.” In other words, the most common reasons for turning pets over to
shelters has nothing to do with overpopulation, but instead people’s (usually)
unavoidable and unpredictable lifestyle changes.

http://www.hsus.org/pets/ pet_adopti...pt_a_pet. html



In State of the Animals 2001, HSUS stated: There was, however, general
consensus among most animal related organizations that the term pet overpopulation
was not only difficult to define, but that it was also probably no longer an
accurate catchphrase to describe the reasons for animals leaving their
original homes, especially for dogs."



Does HSUS ever make up their mind what the real story is? Despite dimi
nishing shelter statistics and knowing the source of shelter populations is due to
owner retention issues, HSUS and Illinois activists continue chanting the
animal rights mantra for across the board pet sterilization.



In response to the proposed mandatory spay/castration ordinance, the ISVMA
issued the following opposition statement:



July 28, 2008. The Illinois State Veterinary Medical Association (ISVMA)
opposes the mandatory spay/neuter ordinance being proposed for the City of
Chicago. The ISVMA opposes this proposed ordinance for the following reasons:

* There is no scientifically- based research that supports the proponent’s
argument that only intact animals bite.



*There is no conclusive evidence that mandatory spay/neuter programs work.



* This mandate would discourage pet owners from seeking rabies immunization
if they are opposed to neutering/spaying and fear they will be reported. It is
already a struggle to ensure the proper safeguards are in place to protect
the public from rabies. Anything that makes rabies vaccination compliance more
difficult should be seriously scrutinized. Rabies is essentially a 100%
fatal disease to humans, dogs and cats.



* There are not enough resources in Chicago to enforce mandatory spay/neuter
in a meaningful way.
__________________
FOHA - Adopt!



"Give thanks to God for being dog. He gave us the joy of angels." - Trixie Koontz, Dog, Trixie Treats & Holiday Wisdom - Christmas is Good!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2008, 11:56 AM
Sweet72947's Avatar
Sweet72947 Sweet72947 is offline
Squishy face
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 9,102
Default

Continuation of article:

Quote:
* With regard to creating a healthier pet, there are both positive and
negative affects accrued from sterilization. It appears that benefits outweigh
risks; however, there are many breed and individual dog variants, suggesting
that professional judgment is required to determine whether and when to
neuter/spay pets.

Although the ordinance’s stated goals to reduce the number of unwanted pets
and gang activity are laudable, said Dr. Steve Dullard, ISVMA Legislative
Committee Chair, the reality is that it will have no effect on these problems.
Instead, it will create some serious public health concerns, cause many animals
to be denied necessary health care, and will trample on the personal
property rights of conscientious pet owners.

http://www.isvma.org/member_ corresp...ay_neuter. doc




Not every councilman has bought into the HSUS argument. An article from
Medill Reports - Chicago, Northwestern University, quotes Ald. Ray Suarez (31st)
as saying, “I don’t like when the government tries to get involved in
everything to solve problems. Right now we’re starting with pets… What’s the next
step?”



Just a few months ago, in May, the Chicago City Council repealed the ban on
foie gras sale that it put in place two years ago at the urging of HSUS and
local activists. No other American city has prohibited foie gras. The Chicago
ban brought a law suit against the City by restaurateurs and has been a source
of embarrassment for the city as residents accused officials of trying to
micromanage people’s lives. Is the Chicago City Council really willing to
follow HSUS on yet another embarrassing, unenforceable animal rightist
legislative journey?



Many people in attendance at the July 29 hearing on the proposed mandatory
spay/castratation ordinance did not have the opportunity to speak concerning
the ordinance. The next City Council meeting is scheduled for September 10 and
presumably the ordinance will be back on the agenda. If you cannot arrange to
meet with your councilman before the next council session, continue to call
and fax letters with your opposition. Contact information can be found here:

http://tinyurl.com/4cuyr
__________________
FOHA - Adopt!



"Give thanks to God for being dog. He gave us the joy of angels." - Trixie Koontz, Dog, Trixie Treats & Holiday Wisdom - Christmas is Good!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:01 PM
ACooper's Avatar
ACooper ACooper is offline
<--------Orson
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IN
Posts: 27,688
Default

Oh man, if Chicago is considering this we (N. Indiana) won't be to far behind!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:18 PM
Beanie's Avatar
Beanie Beanie is offline
Clicker Cult Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 13,244
Default

You're telling me, Coop. If Chicago passes this, the rest of IL is next. Ugh.
__________________


Auggie - The Flash RN NAJ MXP MJP CGC
Payton - Sharp Dressed Man NA NAJ CGC
Pepper - Chocolate Swizz-l-icious
& the pest, Georgie - Peach Pudding N Pie NA OAJ
The Sheltiechick Blog
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:23 PM
ACooper's Avatar
ACooper ACooper is offline
<--------Orson
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IN
Posts: 27,688
Default

And I am sure we can agree that spay/neuter is a good thing, but the laws always go way over board, like making it by 4 months of age.........WAY TOO YOUNG for certain breeds IMO.

*sigh*
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:31 PM
Beanie's Avatar
Beanie Beanie is offline
Clicker Cult Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 13,244
Default

Agreed... that was one of the points I stressed in my letters I sent off to the Aldermen on this. Most of them seemed to already have their minds made up on this issue, though - at least, that's the impression I got from the canned responses I got back. =P
__________________


Auggie - The Flash RN NAJ MXP MJP CGC
Payton - Sharp Dressed Man NA NAJ CGC
Pepper - Chocolate Swizz-l-icious
& the pest, Georgie - Peach Pudding N Pie NA OAJ
The Sheltiechick Blog
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:42 PM
Lilavati's Avatar
Lilavati Lilavati is offline
Arbitrary and Capricious
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 7,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanie View Post
Agreed... that was one of the points I stressed in my letters I sent off to the Aldermen on this. Most of them seemed to already have their minds made up on this issue, though - at least, that's the impression I got from the canned responses I got back. =P
You always get canned responses. But some hapless intern is back there counting letters . . . pity them.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not YOUR lawyer. Nothing I say should be taken as legal advice.

The Court's extensive review of these pages serves as a useful reminder that loaded guns, sharp objects and law degrees should be kept out of the reach of children.

-- United States Magistrate Judge Paul Cleary




Laughing Shadows Bead & Design: http://www.laughingshadows.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2008, 05:56 PM
Bahamutt99's Avatar
Bahamutt99 Bahamutt99 is offline
Dafuq?
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: High Ridge, MO
Posts: 2,365
Default

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Fire off some emails while you're at it.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lindsay
& the Gravity Dogs


Now entering the land of hypnotic signatures...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:42 PM
Kayota's Avatar
Kayota Kayota is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 961
Default

What if it's a breed that has anesthesia problems like a sighthound, or a dog has medical problems and can't undergo the surgery? THEN what?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:49 PM
ACooper's Avatar
ACooper ACooper is offline
<--------Orson
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IN
Posts: 27,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayota View Post
What if it's a breed that has anesthesia problems like a sighthound, or a dog has medical problems and can't undergo the surgery? THEN what?
Hopefully they will take that into consideration with an explanation from your Vet.

But THEN you have the problem of people using that as an out when they shouldn't.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.


©1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site