Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > Dog Training Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:34 PM
Roxy's CD's Avatar
Roxy's CD Roxy's CD is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,016
Default

Quote:
If you feel that you wouldn't like to take the risk, that's personal. But, with me, it's not a risk.
I know you said personally. I can read LOL

I was just asking what the circumstances revolving around the pit on pit attack were.

I can understand why some people would not be comfortable leaving their dogs unattended. I just don't feel that it's a risk at all, personally, in my situation with the dogs I own now. And I will never get a dog that can't be left alone with other dogs unsupervised. It's just not logical or reasonable to me, and until I came to this board, I've never heard of people separating their dogs. Why have two dogs if they don't get along or you can't trust them alone? Just makes no sense.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:36 PM
elegy's Avatar
elegy elegy is offline
overdogged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roxy's CD View Post
Edit (posted at same time): Are you serious elegy? You never leave your two dogs alone?

That's absolutely ridiculous to me and would not fit my lifestyle at all. Roxy and Hades are left alone together often, and there's never been a problem. Roxy goes to sleep and Hades shreds toilet paper.

I'm sure with some dogs and certain temperments that statement is true, but as always there are exceptions, so I do not agree 100%. I can't, because my "vicious pitbull" is fine with my other dog, and they are left alone often.
nope. not ever. never have. never will. it's is absolutely not worth the risk to me and i don't think it's at all "ridiculous". i have two dogs who, if triggered, will fight to win, period. yes, 99% of the time they get along famously. but i'm not willing to take the risk of coming home to torn up or dead dogs.

so they're crated when i'm not here.

it's got absolutely nothing to do with dominance or pack status. luce has been #1 dog forever and mushroom, after the first couple of weeks, has never questioned or challenged that at all. it has nothing to do with when in life they were introduced to each other. it has to do with the fact that both of them are pit bulls.

the worst fight they've ever had (and they've never had one that resulted in wounds bad enough to need medical attention, but i'm sure part of that is that i'm always there. always.) was over a smell in the grass. a smell for crying out loud!

so yeah. they're never alone unsupervised. it's not a big deal. it's the way it's always been. it's the way it'll always be.

i think it's foolish to think a pit bull will never show dog aggression, that a pit bull will never fight. they were bred to do precisely that.

you can do whatever you like with your dogs, but personally, as long as those people i respect most in the pit bull world advocate never leaving them alone together, as long as i continue to see dogs of all breeds come in to the hospital where i work with severe dog fight wounds even though they've lived together their whole lives and never fought before, and as long as i have these two capable dogs with occasionally short fuses, i'll continue to crate and supervise.
__________________
ARCHX Luce CD CD-H RA RL3 RLV RL2X RL1X CGC TT
Steve RA RL1 CL1-R CL1-F ONYX
Bean FDCh-G
and Hambone, flyball hopeful
Save the pit bull, Save the world
Are you Unruly?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-28-2006, 10:02 PM
mojozen's Avatar
mojozen mojozen is offline
bullie lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madison, wi
Posts: 1,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elegy View Post
i think it's foolish to think a pit bull will never show dog aggression, that a pit bull will never fight. they were bred to do precisely that.
Well said. This is also how i feel... i respect my dog's heritage. I respect my dog's abilities. I do not believe he'd fight, but I do not give him the chance to do so. Nor will i in the future when I get my second dog, who will hopefully be either a greyhound or a full blood pit bull.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-28-2006, 10:19 PM
elegy's Avatar
elegy elegy is offline
overdogged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,709
Default

my dogs were kind enough to dispel with the mystery right from the beginning- they're both quite willing to fight in the right circumstances, thanks

but i do think it's silly that we put so much stock in other breeds' heritages- in herding dogs to herd, in retrieving dogs to retrieve, in sighthounds to chase- and yet so many people want to ignore the pit bull's heritage. i guess because it's inconvenient. (i find this is especially often the case with people who have young pit bulls who have not come into their own yet.)

there's a gal i know locally- i first met her at a rally obedience match- who has a pit bull and a pit mix. one has multiple agility titles, the other has at least a rally title, so she's obviously an active and hands-on owner. but she leaves them alone together on a regular basis and she's had to have both of them surgically put back together on multiple occasions (good thing she's also a vet tech!).

it's just not worth it to me.
__________________
ARCHX Luce CD CD-H RA RL3 RLV RL2X RL1X CGC TT
Steve RA RL1 CL1-R CL1-F ONYX
Bean FDCh-G
and Hambone, flyball hopeful
Save the pit bull, Save the world
Are you Unruly?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-28-2006, 10:41 PM
Roxy's CD's Avatar
Roxy's CD Roxy's CD is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,016
Default

It sounds as though, from your words though that you wouldn't be surprised if something happened. Especially seeing as they had a fight over a smell.

My point is that, I do not expect it, and it's not irrational denial.

Not every border collie is a herder, not every lab is a great retriever, just as every pitbull does not have that dog aggression that as you mentioned and is 100% true that they were bred for.

If there is good reason, or you personally don't feel comfortable all the more power to you.

But because there is no reason, never has been to keep them separate, I don't feel that that makes me a bad pit owner, or in denial or whatever else.

Elegy, I didn't mean that I think it's ridiculous that you do that, but I, peronsally would feel ridiculous having to keep my dogs separate. They both enjoy their alone time in the house, Hades as mentioned ripping apart stuffed animals or shredding paper and Roxy having naps.

Quote:
(i find this is especially often the case with people who have young pit bulls who have not come into their own yet.)
I'm not saying that it is, but if this statement is directed towards me, I can assure you, that major personality traits are often clearly visible in early age. Yes, often dominance issues occur much more often when dogs hit 2 or 3, and I am well aware of that. I observe my dogs every day, watching for signs of aggression from both Roxy and Hades. I just don't say that Hades is submissive, I observe it, daily. And if one day, I observe anything but, he will be crated when he's unsupervised. But until I see anything that makes me nervous, or makes me feel as though it is a risk, given Hades personality, which is so much more than happy go lucky, willing to please or submissive, there is no need.

I'm not in denial about the pitbulls heritage. But I'm not going to place breed standards on my dog, just because that's his breed. Just as you wouldn't label an obvious aggressive golden, a caring, calm submissive dog, just because that's a trait that goldens are known for. There are exceptions to every breed.

Why is it so hard to understand that the pitbull is a breed, and there are exceptions to them as well? Breed specific qualities play a huge role in a dog's personality, but how often have you heard of BC's that have no herding intuition? Or retrievers that don't like the water? OR dare I say pitbulls that have no dog on dog aggression?

I respect the pit's heritage, but I only use it where it applies clearly for my dog. I'm not going label him something that he isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-28-2006, 10:58 PM
elegy's Avatar
elegy elegy is offline
overdogged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roxy's CD View Post
My point is that, I do not expect it, and it's not irrational denial.
and my point is.... maybe you SHOULD expect it.

and no, dog aggression is not always visible at a young age. many pit bulls love other dogs until they reach the age of 2ish and then things frequently change. it may become a gradual lessening of tolerence, or they may literally change overnight.

it is NOT a dominance issue.

it's an issue that a normal snark or snorf that occurs in the normal events of lives in ANY multi-dog household turns into a full-out battle because it's instinctual. outside stimuli can overload a pit bull and flip them into fight mode. overly exuberent play can flip them into fight mode.

yes, there are cold pit bulls, but just because a pit bull hasn't fought doesn't mean they won't. it may just mean they haven't had their trigger flipped yet.
__________________
ARCHX Luce CD CD-H RA RL3 RLV RL2X RL1X CGC TT
Steve RA RL1 CL1-R CL1-F ONYX
Bean FDCh-G
and Hambone, flyball hopeful
Save the pit bull, Save the world
Are you Unruly?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-28-2006, 11:11 PM
Roxy's CD's Avatar
Roxy's CD Roxy's CD is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,016
Default

Quote:
Yes, often dominance issues occur much more often when dogs hit 2 or 3, and I am well aware of that
Although, from what I've read, and been told, it is a dominance issue. You state otherwise. So why then is there a certain age? The basis behind the dominance issues at a certain age, is horomone levels and the "puppy attitude wearing" off. Also a desire for a higher position in the pecking order all comes with age. Even this statement that my vet, trainers, behaviourlist and average joe's have mentioned to me is not always true.

You must think I'm a retard, and just got a pit, didn't think about the consequences, didn't think about socializing, didnt' think about training, and didn't think about evaluating Hades temperment at all. I just got him, his at my house, I don't socialize, I don't train, I don't observe behaviours.

Well, I guess I'm just gonna have to sit here and cross my fingers and hope nothing "flips his trigger". And I'll have to admit than, by your standards of course, I'm a horrible pit owner, because I claim to know my horrible, ticking time bomb pitbull.

So what you are saying than, quite simply. Is that every dog that was bred to do something, DOES IT.

EVERY retriever retrieves.
EVERY herder herds.
EVERY "guarder" guards.
EVERY pitbull is dog aggressive.

And if they don't, when they hit two years old they will, or three"ish".

Whilst I do not agree with that at all, I still do respect that that's what pits were bred to do. But still, I'm not going to label my dog something that it is not. Just as many people who work in the field ditch dogs that just don't have it. Hades just doesn't have it. Is that not possible to you?

Or every dog that was bred for something just does it?

As you mentioned, ANY breed is capable of "turning" at a certain age. So why then don't you tell ANYONE with a multi-dog household that leaving dogs unattended alone is irresponsible?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:12 AM
doberkim doberkim is offline
Naturally Natural
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,380
Default

i just got home 2 hours later after spending the past 3 hours sewing together two dogs that lived together their entire lives, and just tore each other open. one dog has no less than 50 bite wounds all over his body, many which required drains. the other has 4 large puncture wounds all over her face, but she "won" and is much less injured than the other dog. even with our very fair pricing, this owner has just dropped over a grand for a "quick" dog fight.


so the point being, you would rather risk your dogs lives, than separate them. you would rather bet that hades is better than the majority of pit bulls and overcome what generations of breeding has bred into him. socialization has nothing to do with it - i socialized the hell out of my dobermans and they would still have protected me hands down, when push came to shove.

roxy - why dont you go argue this with other responsible pit bull owners?
www.pitbullforum.com

i am sure these people - heavily involved with pitties in dog sports, rescue, and other venues, have had a hell of a lot more experience than 99% of people on this board with pit bulls and mixes thereof.

personally? the main reason i DONT have a pit in my home right now, is dog aggression, plain and simple. i take a risk with any breed being aggressive, but i take a bigger one with a pit bull, and at this time in my life, its not something i want to deal with. im never going to try to pretend my dogs are better than their breeding and their breed history.
__________________

ARCHX Bowie's Semper Fidelis v DRU, VC CDX ASCA-CDX CDX-H RE RL1X RL2X RL3 ATT WAC TT CGC FFX-OG

Beja's Bombs Away v Bowie, CD ASCA-CD CD-H BN RN NA RL1 WAC ATT YTT PTT CGC

Bowie's Here Comes the Boom!


http://otchrah.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:22 AM
Roxy's CD's Avatar
Roxy's CD Roxy's CD is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,016
Default

So then to answer my question posed towards elegy, doberkim, you feel that no dog, regardless of breed should be left alone attended, regardless of how long they lived together or not.

That takes the onus off me, as the only pit owner apparently on this board that does not separate my dogs, but onto anyone with a multi-dog household to separate their animals.

If that's your experience that's your experience. But there are many multi-dog households that do just fine. So that discredits that statement to a point. And would do the same for the "pit" singled out as a breed.

As a vet, I would hope that you wouldn't have had that outlook. While my vet respects the breed as well, she knows that there are exceptions to every breed, positive and negative. While you must encounter horrible situations like the one you mentioned above, you must know of people who live happy lives with a multi-dog household even if they have pitbulls.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:43 AM
doberkim doberkim is offline
Naturally Natural
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,380
Default

First off, where did I say every breed needs to be separated?

As a vet, I recommend to every pit bull owner to crate their dog when they leave the house. I recommend every pit owner completes at least basic obedience with their dog. I recommend every single pit owner spays and neuters their dog. I recommend that every pit owner never takes their dog to the dog park. I recommend every pit owner never lets their pit off leash in public. I recommend evrery pit owner never leaves their dog outside unattended, even in a fenced in yard.

I recognize that pit bull owners need to be THAT MUCH MORE vigilant in todays day and age. I'm not going to argue - clearly you are going to believe what you want about your dogs no matter what, so why do we waste our time? You don't want to hear it - go to the pit bull forums and tell it to them. Go hear THEIR stories.
__________________

ARCHX Bowie's Semper Fidelis v DRU, VC CDX ASCA-CDX CDX-H RE RL1X RL2X RL3 ATT WAC TT CGC FFX-OG

Beja's Bombs Away v Bowie, CD ASCA-CD CD-H BN RN NA RL1 WAC ATT YTT PTT CGC

Bowie's Here Comes the Boom!


http://otchrah.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.


1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site