|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is an EXCELENT site with tons of pics to show you what a proper pit looks like... http://www.apbtconformation.com/head.htm
Standard Comparsions... http://www.apbtconformation.com/standardcomparison.htm Last edited by rottiegirl; 07-04-2006 at 02:28 AM. |
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
No one looks at the standard when breeding.
Read the part on shoulders in the UKC standard and look at all the pictures you can,and try ti find 1 with the correct shoulders. http://www.apbtconformation.com/frontstudy3.htm the fronts are starting to look like Fox Terriers which is wrong. I left it as one as that will be hard enuff.I have yet to see one in person with the correct shoulders. So again no one is reading the standard. |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
a dog with weak structure, shallow chest for example, bowed front legs, straight hind end, whatever is not going to do as well in the pit. that's just the way it is. structure and conformation is extremely important in a working breed. what good is a dog with excellent working ability and temperament and heart if his body breaks down or can't support his spirit? conformation is so much more than "looking pretty."
__________________
ARCHX Luce CD CD-H RA RL3 RLV RL2X RL1X CGC TT Mushroom Couch-holder-downer EX Flyball Ninja Steve RA RL1 CL1-R CL1-F FMX and Bean, Mission Specialist Save the pit bull, Save the world Are you Unruly? |
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you look into GSD's you would see that poeple who work their dogs from working lines do not care for looks. I'm glad they dont breed to AKC conformation. A breed standard should be for an ENTIRE breed, then why are so many breeds divided? Explain that. Look at huskies, GSD's, Rotties, Dobies, Mals ect. They are ALL divided and have MANY breed standards, that fit that certain line they were bred into. Standards have changed immensly from breed to breed. Look at the first dog for each breed and then look at an example from this day and age. Then compare those to other dogs of the same breed used for a different purpose. And keep going, and you would notice a BIG difference. People focus WAY too much on looks rather than working ability. And unfortunately if I stick to "standard" then my dogs will not be able to work, because the structure is TERRIBLE. I would take a mutt who can work over a working breed bred for conformation and shows NO working ability what-so-ever. |
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I look at this picture I see APBT written all over it. Yes, she is on the bulky side but is not exxagerated, like most pits today. She, IMO, is very well balanced.
http://www.matrixkennels.com/emma.htm |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are people who like a well conditioned dog, and then theres people who think it looks anorexic. Standard: The loin is short, muscular and slightly arched to the top of the croup, but narrower than the rib cage and with a moderate tuck-up (TUCK UP IS VERY IMPORTANT IN AN ATHLETIC DOG AND THE DEGREE OF TUCK IS INDICATIVE OF THE LEVEL OF CONDITIONING.) The croup is slightly sloping downward. |
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The dog I posted conforms to the standard... the one you posted conforms to the standard just as much. |
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
Matrix Kennels has quite a nice reputation...I also like this kennel and have spoken to the owner a few times...they're amstaffs...anywho, breeds apbts as well if I do recall...to me, they're the same diff...anyways, a very solid and reputable breeder:
http://www.hartagold.com/
__________________
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
|