Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Forum News > The Fire Hydrant


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-02-2014, 06:03 PM
MinPinOwner's Avatar
MinPinOwner MinPinOwner is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 500
Default

I was about to post the same article, Linds. I read about munchausen by proxy and parents putting their children through all kinds of unneeded medical care just for the attention. The poor kid, if that's truly what was happening.
__________________
Old people always poke me at weddings and say you're next. So, I started doing the same to them at funerals.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-02-2014, 07:51 PM
Paviche's Avatar
Paviche Paviche is online now
Duuuuude.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linds View Post
I refuse to jump to conclusions seeing how little actual facts are being presented and the way it's very, very one sided.

That being said, I thought this Slate article did a really good job showing more than one side so I thought I would throw it into this thread.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health..._suspects.html
That was a good article, thank you for posting it!
__________________

Kendall & the Red Dogs: Rowan & Riff
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-02-2014, 07:54 PM
release the hounds release the hounds is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linds View Post
I refuse to jump to conclusions seeing how little actual facts are being presented and the way it's very, very one sided.

That being said, I thought this Slate article did a really good job showing more than one side so I thought I would throw it into this thread.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health..._suspects.html
This article does nothing to sway my opinion. I usually am very much in favor of wanting more info and not jumping to conclusions, but in this case I am not. It is wrong. Maybe there is "medical child abuse" and if there is, the hospital should be able to prove that without a shadow of any doubt whatsoever and do it quickly. If they can't I'm siding with the parents every single time.

Sometimes kids are born to crappy parents, sometimes those parents just don't agree with you, some kids are wonderful, some are horrible, some grow up to be awesome, some we wish never were born. and everything in between.

None of this extremely vague stuff about a study not large enough or significant enough to even warrant a publication, let alone citing as a reason to take away a child. Or "the child's mood improved when the mother left the room" Ok, then show us, not me necessarily, but a panel of independent psych docs and convince them. NOW.

It's a scary world when a doctor can use something like that as an excuse and turn a family's world upside down. A parent should have absolutely 100% control over their own child's medical choices/decisions/treatments/etc. 100% and if they're going to remove those, then the hospital should have to prove without any shadow of any doubt that they are right, and everyone else is wrong.

I really, really don't want to live in a world where a doctor can say some vague stuff and have your child taken away because you don't agree with them. I'd like to think most others don't either.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-02-2014, 07:58 PM
sparks19's Avatar
sparks19 sparks19 is online now
I'd rather be at Disney
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 28,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by release the hounds View Post
This article does nothing to sway my opinion. I usually am very much in favor of wanting more info and not jumping to conclusions, but in this case I am not. It is wrong. Maybe there is "medical child abuse" and if there is, the hospital should be able to prove that without a shadow of any doubt whatsoever and do it quickly. If they can't I'm siding with the parents every single time.

Sometimes kids are born to crappy parents, sometimes those parents just don't agree with you, some kids are wonderful, some are horrible, some grow up to be awesome, some we wish never were born. and everything in between.

None of this extremely vague stuff about a study not large enough or significant enough to even warrant a publication, let alone citing as a reason to take away a child. Or "the child's mood improved when the mother left the room" Ok, then show us, not me necessarily, but a panel of independent psych docs and convince them. NOW.

It's a scary world when a doctor can use something like that as an excuse and turn a family's world upside down. A parent should have absolutely 100% control over their own child's medical choices/decisions/treatments/etc. 100% and if they're going to remove those, then the hospital should have to prove without any shadow of any doubt that they are right, and everyone else is wrong.

I really, really don't want to live in a world where a doctor can say some vague stuff and have your child taken away because you don't agree with them. I'd like to think most others don't either.
This 100%!!!!!!!!
__________________
Quote:

“Meaninglessness does not come from being weary of pain. Meaninglessness comes from being weary of pleasure.”


G.K. Chesterton
“Family fun is as necessary to modern living as a kitchen refrigerator.” – Walt Disney






Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:10 PM
sillysally's Avatar
sillysally sillysally is offline
Obey the Toad.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A hole in the bottom of the sea.
Posts: 5,018
Default

So this case aside, how much medical say SHOULD a parent have when it comes to their child? Should they allowed to let the child die of a treatable disease because they don't want to take the child to a doctor? Should they be able to withhold medical treatment for broken bones? Should there ever be an exception to parents having 100% control over a child's medical care?
__________________

~Christina--Mom to:
Sally--8 yr old pit bull mix
Jack--6 yr old Labrador
Sadie & Runt--12 yr old calico DSHs
Pickles & Kiwi--3 yr old white winged parakeets
Yoda--1 yr old Quaker parrot
Solo--12 yr old Senegal parrot
Sheena--Quarter Horse--3/24/86-6/23/11--Rest Easy Sweet Girl~




Labs do it in the lake.


Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:21 PM
Paviche's Avatar
Paviche Paviche is online now
Duuuuude.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post
So this case aside, how much medical say SHOULD a parent have when it comes to their child? Should they allowed to let the child die of a treatable disease because they don't want to take the child to a doctor? Should they be able to withhold medical treatment for broken bones? Should there ever be an exception to parents having 100% control over a child's medical care?
This was my thought as well - what about the parents who refuse to treat their kids for religious reasons? I've seen way too many stories like this: http://time.com/8750/faith-healing-p...-childs-death/
__________________

Kendall & the Red Dogs: Rowan & Riff
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:24 PM
sparks19's Avatar
sparks19 sparks19 is online now
I'd rather be at Disney
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 28,365
Default

Depends on the age of the child. I feel that a child should be able
TO decide if they don't want to undergo chemo anymore or other harsh medical treatments for terminal illnesses (and this had been contested and forced upon teens who have decided to not take the regular
Course anymore).

Young children, I would say if the
Doctors
Could prove without a doubt that there is medical abuse where the parents aren't seeking any alternative to a broken bone... Perhaps.

I mean, I broke my leg when I was 8. I refused to go to the hospital and fought it with everything in me. Finally after almost 12 hours my mom forced me to
Go but not before some "well if your leg is fine, then go to bed". Should she be punished for not rushing me right away? NO, she was and is a wonderful mother with a stubborn child. Had anyone made an issue about the length of time
To get me to the hospital they would be making a HUGE mistake!

I don't believe they should be able to take a Child over a differing of diagnosis from a different hospital.
__________________
Quote:

“Meaninglessness does not come from being weary of pain. Meaninglessness comes from being weary of pleasure.”


G.K. Chesterton
“Family fun is as necessary to modern living as a kitchen refrigerator.” – Walt Disney






Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-03-2014, 08:40 AM
release the hounds release the hounds is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post
So this case aside, how much medical say SHOULD a parent have when it comes to their child? Should they allowed to let the child die of a treatable disease because they don't want to take the child to a doctor? Should they be able to withhold medical treatment for broken bones? Should there ever be an exception to parents having 100% control over a child's medical care?
how much? all of it. Period. I don't know of any religious or person stances in this country where casting or setting a bone is withheld because of real convictions and genuine concern for the child, but if there were, I'd be ok with them witholding care too. I'd find it incredibly misguided, but they aren't my kids. I hate to break it to the rest of the world, but hundreds of thousands of people are killed every year in this country due to medical treatments too. Not malpractice mind you, the legitimate and proper use of medical care still kills people, kids included. No matter what YOU think of the risks, it should not be YOUR place to make anyone else's decision.

If the state can prove the parents were withholding care simply because they didn't give a **** about their kid, then charge the heck out of them, run them thru and throw them away.

The flip side is you have adoptive parents or foster parents who are threatened with having their children taken because of refusing something as silly as a flu shot.

I guess if you're a just go with the flow, do whatever they tell me, and not take any proactive role the decision making for your self or child, this issue probably isn't a big deal. For the rest of us, it's kind of scary.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-03-2014, 08:52 AM
sassafras's Avatar
sassafras sassafras is offline
such sights to show you
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by release the hounds View Post
I guess if you're a just go with the flow, do whatever they tell me, and not take any proactive role the decision making for your self or child, this issue probably isn't a big deal. For the rest of us, it's kind of scary.
An ad hominem AND a false dichotomy in one sentence. Logical fallacy win!!


There is middle ground between complete hands off and "they're coming for your children!!!" The fact that this is an unusual, newsworthy event makes me wonder what's going on that the world doesn't know about. The parents can say anything they like, while the hospital's lips are sealed due to confidentiality laws. There's a lot of doctor ego tied up with the original diagnosis, too - those doctors don't necessarily have the girl's best interest at heart but they're thinking about their reputations.

Someday it will all come out in the wash, but I don't think the sky is falling for John and Jane Q Public and their kids with scraped knees.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-03-2014, 08:58 AM
release the hounds release the hounds is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,158
Default

so I win? Awesome


anyway, the hospitals lips aren't sealed, they took control of the child, they have the rights, they can say whatever they want. or don't they have control of the child? What did the court say?

So now doctors with egos trump the wishes of parents? Even better
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.


©1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site