|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, so I'm sure these have been discussed here before, but not since I've been here! I was just having a "discussion" (argument) with someone on FB about responsible breeders and I mentioned that if someone wants to compete in Conformation their dog needs to be intact. The person responded by saying, "Um... No they don't. They make neuticles!"
So I guess my question is what do you feel about that argument? I, personally, think it is unethical and essentially "cheating" or "false advertisement." Also, I'm sure it's against the rules, right? I can't imagine it would be allowed. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think they're okay . . . If this is the other part of the proposed breeding program
![]()
__________________
In a controversy the instant we feel anger we have already ceased striving for the truth, and have begun striving for ourselves. ~Buddha Stupid is the most notoriously incurable and contagious disease known to mankind. If you find yourself in close proximity to someone infected with stupid, walk away as soon as said infection is noted. There are few things more nauseating than pure obedience. ~ Kvothe ***8206;"silence is the language of god, all else is poor translation." — Rumi Be a god. Know when to shut up. Good Kharma Tags Felurian |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is *very* against the rules. I was talking to a judge once about her "dog show horror stories" and she told me about a time she was going over a dog and its balls fell off in her hand. Boy was she embarassed..
Why anyone would want to compete in the ring with a "neuticle" dog is beyond me, they make altered classes in UKC anyways...
__________________
![]() www.brigadoonbordercollies.com http://brigadoonbc.wordpress.com/ Do you want your dog to respect you because you demanded it, or because you truly earned it? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Isn't one of the bigger points of showing to prove your dog is a worthy example of the breed to be bred?
..so what would be the point if your dog is neutered? not to mention, it is very against the rules.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I think they're ridiculous, but I also think altered dogs should be allowed to show. I can see the point of if a dog is good enough to be a champion, it's good for the breed to have puppies, but if that was valid dogs should require health testing in order to show.
__________________
"My favorite color is green, green like newly cut grass. When it comes to green with envy, though, you can stick it up your @ss!" ~ Grammy ![]() http://www.adorablebeasts.blogspot.com |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
are dogs not required to be health tested in order to show?
0.o I certainly thought that was a rule before right now!
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Definitely not, there have been plenty of BIS winners who were dysplastic.
__________________
![]() www.brigadoonbordercollies.com http://brigadoonbc.wordpress.com/ Do you want your dog to respect you because you demanded it, or because you truly earned it? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I thought the whole point of shows was showing off the best example of the breed.. wouldn't the best of the breed not be dysplastic?!
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
People show dogs with health issues all the time. If they aren't visible in the show ring, they don't matter. I personally think it's ridiculous
__________________
"My favorite color is green, green like newly cut grass. When it comes to green with envy, though, you can stick it up your @ss!" ~ Grammy ![]() http://www.adorablebeasts.blogspot.com |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's creepy!
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
|