Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Forum News > The Fire Hydrant

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2012, 11:28 AM
sillysally's Avatar
sillysally sillysally is offline
Obey the Toad.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A hole in the bottom of the sea.
Posts: 5,074
Default How Young is Too Young?

We went to see the Hunger Games last night. I know it is rated PG-13, but it is violent. I saw a couple of very young children there--one was about 5 and the other 2 or 3. They were quiet and everything, that wasn't really the issue, but that just seemed REALLY young to me to be seeing stuff like that.

I'm 31 and a few of the scenes bothered me. I heard from a couple of news sources that it was fairly violent and this is the second week it was showing, so it's not like that should have been a surprise to anyone contemplating whether or not their small children should go with them to see it.

Am I just out of touch or does that seem really young to anyone else?

~Christina--Mom to:
Sally--8 yr old pit bull mix
Jack--6 yr old Labrador
Sadie & Runt--12 yr old calico DSHs
Pickles & Kiwi--3 yr old white winged parakeets
Yoda--1 yr old Quaker parrot
Solo--12 yr old Senegal parrot
Sheena--Quarter Horse--3/24/86-6/23/11--Rest Easy Sweet Girl~

Labs do it in the lake.

Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 11:33 AM
lizzybeth727's Avatar
lizzybeth727 lizzybeth727 is offline
Top Dog
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 6,403

I've often thought that PG-13 movies are too violent for 13-year-olds. Personally, I'm NOT GOOD with violence, and couldn't stand PG-13 movies until I was in college. I still won't watch a violent R-rated movie.

But yeah, I think it's pretty idiotic to go to a PG-13 movie with a kid under 5. I wouldn't even take a toddler to a PG movie.... for one thing because G movies are usually pretty short and easier with a little kid. (Isn't Hunger Games long?)

I was upset when I saw kids under 5 at the last Harry Potter movie. Not only is it a little violent and a little disturbing, it's also VERY long. The kids didn't bother me (I was too into the movie), but most of them were gone by the end of the movie.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 12:18 PM
yoko's Avatar
yoko yoko is offline
Top Dog
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 5,347

I'm a lover of horror movies. You name the type of horror and I'm there. I always see small children in those movies and I'm horrified. Every Saw I went to see there were always small children that were around 5-12. Every time something scary/gory would happen the kids would scream and start crying... Every. Time.

My friends would always ask the the parents to take the kids out and they shouldn't watch the movie. EVERY answer was 'just because I have kids doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to go watch a movie'.

I agree but I think that if you are taking a kid you should probably not see certain movies. The main problem I think you ran into is in most people's eyes PG-13 is the new PG.
Thank you Vivien and Angel Chicken for the siggy! Also I have been frosted!!! And as of 9/13/07 I know the secret handshake!

Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 12:37 PM
AdrianneIsabel's Avatar
AdrianneIsabel AdrianneIsabel is offline
Glutton for Crazy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 8,893

There was an infant in the theater last night when we saw the hunger games. I was annoyed at best.
Sloan von Krigbaum IPO1 CGC BH CD NA NJ PD MJ-N RATI RATN 3/7/10 -
Shamoo NJ-N RATI RATN 3/1/98 -
Phelan du Loups du Soleil CGC RATI 6/15/13 -
Chili Brigades Brover 5/23/14 -

Arnold CGC TDI FD 6/29/04 - 07/05/13
Backup CGC HIC CD SRD SJ-N RATI 12/29/09 - 07/05/13

You were amazing, we did amazing things.

Harmony Canine, relationship based training.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 12:43 PM
zoe08's Avatar
zoe08 zoe08 is offline
Top Dog
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,160

I think this is a case of parents not getting babysitters, not because they were actually taking their 5 year old to see the movie. I totally don't agree with it. IMO, if you can't afford a babysitter, you can't afford the movies. Or you should be going to see a KID movie. People keep complaining that the Hunger Games is a violent children's book. It is NOT a children's book, it is a young adult novel. I think they need to separate the YA section from the children's section in book stores and on Amazon and such because people are getting the wrong idea, that just because it is listed under "children's" means it is acceptable for 6-10 year olds.

However I think the actual age for what is ok would vary depending on your child's maturity. But definitely not for children 10 or under. I think 13 is probably a good age to start considering it, but I think parent's need to be the judge on whether or not their child is ready for it.

PG-13 is far from the new PG if anything it's going the other way. Often things are PG-13 that should be R and things are PG that should be PG-13.

Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 12:44 PM
Laurelin's Avatar
Laurelin Laurelin is offline
I'm All Ears
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 30,963

There was a little kid in our theater that kept screaming during the movie. (Like frightened screaming). I really don't know why people bring little kids to those kinds of movies.

Hank CA - (approx. 1 1/2 year old Spotty Dog)
Mia CGC - (6 1/2 year old Papillon)
Summer TG3 TIAD - (11 year old Papillon)
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 12:46 PM
stardogs stardogs is offline
Behavior Nerd
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 4,925

I actually didn't think the Hunger Games movie was that violent, especially compared to the same scenes in the books, but do think the PG13 designation was correct because of some of the scenes. Some of the themes (being taken away from home/family by force to basically be killed for sport, teens killing other teens, suicide, etc.) were not something I'd be comfortable having a kid under 12 or 13 watch.

I don't worry too much about infants at movies like that if they can somehow stay quiet through the whole thing (a late movie when they are sleeping I suppose, but 2.5 hours is loooong) since they wouldn't actually be watching, but a 2-5 yo?! No way.
Erin, Ziva, Kestrel, Aerten, and Snipe
Always in our hearts: The Amazing Maggie Mae

Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 01:28 PM
ACooper's Avatar
ACooper ACooper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IN
Posts: 27,770

Well, the PG in PG13 is supposed to mean PARENTAL GUIDANCE......and the parent should know their child and make a responsible decision, but of course we know that isn't the normal case with the general populace

Out of my 5 children (the youngest is now 12) I had one that I could not/would not let view violent/scary movies. She could not (and still don't) handle it well and would have nightmares for days afterwards. I have one that I couldn't let watch much violence until he was in his teens because he got way to into it and the line between reality and fantasy blurred.

The other three were fine, knew the difference between entertainment and didn't take scary/violence to heart. Know your kid, and also GET A SITTER OR KEEP YOUR BUM AT HOME, LOL

I would also like to say I teach Sunday School ages 6-8. The boys in my class are ALWAYS talking about playing Call of Duty, in graphic details............HELLO, those are rated M and the last I knew 6, 7, and 8 year olds are not that M!

It doesn't matter how movies or games are rated if parents are going to ignore the ratings!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 01:34 PM
sparks19's Avatar
sparks19 sparks19 is offline
I'd rather be at Disney
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 28,562

I started watching Horror movies when I was about 10 lol but those were the cheesy 80's kind. but I was a horror flick junkie. My best friend and I would hole up in my room for the weekend with a horror flick marathon lol

That being said... people need to use some common sense when taking kids to see certain movies.

an infant? not really a big deal. they don't get it anyway and they won't remember it and its unlikely to be upsetting to them because as I said...they don't get it beyond moving images on a screen. they don't get that it's violent or supposed to be scary or what have you (although that seems a bit loud to be taking an infant to)

but children Hannah's age? I don't get that at all. it's frightening for them and if it's not frightening for them then I think there is another issue there.

we pretty much steer clear of the main theater here anyway. I will wait until the movies come out to the $2 theater to take hannah to see them lol and then if it's something she can't handle or doesn't like then we are only out a couple of bucks rather than $50 lol

“Meaninglessness does not come from being weary of pain. Meaninglessness comes from being weary of pleasure.”

G.K. Chesterton
“Family fun is as necessary to modern living as a kitchen refrigerator.” – Walt Disney
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 02:38 PM
CaliTerp07's Avatar
CaliTerp07 CaliTerp07 is offline
Top Dog
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 7,652

PG-13 means thirteen, in my opinion. There are plenty of movies appropriate for younger kids. Hunger games is not one of them. The ONLY exception I could see would be if my 11/12 year old had read and loved the books. Then, I might screen it first and let them see it if it were appropriate. Probably once it came out on video though.

It is a violent, traumatic story line. I haven't seen the film yet, but I've read the books and even then I'd be very cautious letting an elementary school child read them.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.

©1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site