Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > The Breeding Ground


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:17 PM
Laurelin's Avatar
Laurelin Laurelin is online now
I'm All Ears
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 29,953
Default Toy dogs- how small is too small?

Okay I'm NOT trying to ruffle feathers but I think this is a very important discussion for anyone in toys to think about. It greatly concerns me because a) the ring trend in the past few years has seen papillons decrease about 2 lbs and b) I intend to breed a toy breed in the far-ish future. It's been on my mind a lot with recent threads.

So how small is too small? Our standard is 9-12 inches without weight specified. The ring trend lately especially with American dogs is averaging about 6 lbs whereas paps used to average about 8 lbs. I know that doesn't sound like much to most people, but it's a LOT. Fortunately it's been discussed in the papillon breed club and magazine a lot and there is a concerted effort to bump the weight back up at least among most breeders I know. Still I see some 3-4 lb papillons showing and being bred when to me that is pretty much disqualifying them in my opinion from breeding.

Most papillon people I know agree that 3 lbs is the "safe weight" as far as hypoglycemia goes. And yet there are breeds where 3 lbs or even under is within standard. Is this right? I can't wrap my mind around it. That's not even getting into whelping issues that increase a lot the smaller you go. And bone structure. With people with large breeds it probably doesn't seem to matter that 2 or so pounds, but there is a large difference in how sturdy a 2 lb dog is from a 4 lb from a 6 lb, etc. Even taking Mia and Summer for example, Mia is just under 6 lbs and is smaller than I'd want a dog whereas Summer is almost 8 lbs. Just looking at their bone structure, Summer has much sturdier legs. I don't worry about Summer as much as I do Mia at all.

I dunno, just a jumble of thoughts but I really have to wonder WHY are we breeding dogs that are 2-3 lbs and why is this okay? You greatly reduce the health risks just by bumping up the weight 2 or so pounds. I don't think it's just teacup breeders that are breeding things too small.

Personally for my breed I want to see the average go back up to 8-10 lbs. I would never breed a dog that was under 5 lbs and under 6 lbs would be with serious, serious hesitation.

So thoughts?
__________________
Mia CGC - (5 year old Papillon)
Hank - (approx. 10 month old Spotty Dog)
Summer TG3 TIAD - (10 year old Papillon)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:23 PM
Zoom's Avatar
Zoom Zoom is offline
Twin 2.0
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 40,737
Default

Itsy bitsy dogs are being bred cause they're "cute" and "easier to carry around in bags". I personally would like to see most of the toy breeds bump their sizes back up to "safe" sizes. Yorkies used to regularly be 8-12lbs and now you see the waify little 2-3 lbers walking around.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:26 PM
Fran101's Avatar
Fran101 Fran101 is offline
Resident fainting goat
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 12,505
Default

I think as long as dogs are healthy and STURDY (no breaking bones every time they jump off a couch) then things are fine. For a chihuahua, 8-10 would be a bit much.. Id say about 5 pounds is perfect size. They are still small enough for travel and being in a carrier, yet big enough that they aren't fragile.

breeders breed small because well..thats what people want (small meaning 6 lbs or less). if people wanted larger dogs they wouldnt be looking at toy breeds lol and as long as they are raising healthy dogs then I don't see the issue really..
I wouldnt want an 8-10 lb chihuahua. for that, id go to a shelter, not a breeder.

as for 2-3 lb dogs. I agree with you there, I see no reason to be breeding dogs that tiny. 9 times out of 10 health problems arise because of the size. and theres no reason to HAVE a dog that small. 5-7 pound dogs, I see why some people (including myself) prefer it. Easier to travel with for instance. but 3 pounds? I think thats sacrificing the health/well being of a dog just to be able to say "my dog is tiny"

thats just my 2 cents.
__________________

Disclaimer: I work for Trupanion and love it/our policy! But I do not speak for the company or as the company.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:27 PM
Laurelin's Avatar
Laurelin Laurelin is online now
I'm All Ears
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 29,953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoom View Post
Itsy bitsy dogs are being bred cause they're "cute" and "easier to carry around in bags". I personally would like to see most of the toy breeds bump their sizes back up to "safe" sizes. Yorkies used to regularly be 8-12lbs and now you see the waify little 2-3 lbers walking around.
I agree. Poms are another, they used to be around 30 lbs, not 2-3! Papillons are interesting because they appear to have always been pretty small or maybe even smaller. Most old standards I read say 8 lbs, but I read one from the early 1900s that said 3-5lbs! I'm glad they're not that tiny anymore.
__________________
Mia CGC - (5 year old Papillon)
Hank - (approx. 10 month old Spotty Dog)
Summer TG3 TIAD - (10 year old Papillon)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:32 PM
PoodleMommy PoodleMommy is offline
Yorkie Love
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,443
Default

In yorkies the standard is "under 7 pounds" with no minimum weight specified, but if you talk to anyone who knows a lot about the breed they will agree that 4 to 7 pounds is really what you should be breeding for... sometimes a runt will end up a little smaller, but you will usually see them listed by breeders as needing to go to "special homes" or "experienced homes" and they almost always stay with the breeder longer then the rest of the litter. Bitches should really be at the high end of the range 6-7 pounds for breeding, the males can be slightly smaller and still be "breeding worthy".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:33 PM
Laurelin's Avatar
Laurelin Laurelin is online now
I'm All Ears
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 29,953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fransheska101 View Post

breeders breed small because well..thats what people want (small meaning 6 lbs or less). if people wanted larger dogs they wouldnt be looking at toy breeds lol and as long as they are raising healthy dogs then I don't see the issue really..
I wouldnt want an 8-10 lb chihuahua. for that, id go to a shelter, not a breeder.
I don't have a problem with toy dogs (obviously ) or the fact that they are small. It's of course their trademark and part of the reason they are so desirable to some people. But honestly when you look at them in all real instances except for health there isn't much a difference between a 5 lb dog and an 8 lb dog, except the 8 lb dog is quite a bit sturdier. Just using my dogs as an example. I think Mia will top at about 6- 6.5 lbs and she's tiny as is. Summer is just as portable as Mia and just as easy to travel with but those 2 lbs do add a lot in the way of how sturdy she is.

I don't really have a problem with 5-6 lbs. I have 2 dogs in that range as is and they're sturdy enough and hypoglycemia isn't an issue. But for my breed in particular, I'd like to see them even a bit bigger.
__________________
Mia CGC - (5 year old Papillon)
Hank - (approx. 10 month old Spotty Dog)
Summer TG3 TIAD - (10 year old Papillon)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:41 PM
MandyPug's Avatar
MandyPug MandyPug is offline
Sport Model Pug
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 5,252
Default

With Pugs it isn't an issue thankfully... Unfortunately it's going the OTHER way! The dogs winning in the ring are in the 20-25lb range usually! The standard calls for 14-18lbs, but no one really cares about it anymore.

I think that's a big issue too. They're still a toy dog, but when people are looking for that toy dog that's small enough to be portable but big enough to be sturdy that 25lb pug is too much dog.

Back to the topic... I like to see those smaller end toy dogs in the 7-8lb range as an average for most and no smaller than 5lbs. Those tiny tiny 2-3lb dogs are just too fragile and have too much potential for issues
__________________

Izzie the Wonderpug RA AGIS AGJIS MADC AGDC MSDC CGN

The Proudest Pug
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:51 PM
PoodleMommy PoodleMommy is offline
Yorkie Love
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,443
Default

Im trying to go through the toy dogs in my mind and am coming up blank...

is there a breed where 2-3 pounds is actually "acceptable" like good breeders are actually breeding to that size?

At least from the dogs I can think of, it seems like 2-3 pounds "teacups" or "micros" are something that puppy mills are creating to make more money not something that is actually accepted in the breed.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:55 PM
Laurelin's Avatar
Laurelin Laurelin is online now
I'm All Ears
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 29,953
Default

Well the problem imo lies in not specifying a lower end for the weight. I know chis can be 2-3 lbs as well as yorkies and poms and even occasionally paps though the smallest I've seen in the ring is about 3 ish lbs. (not a puppy) The smallest papillon I know is 2.5 lbs but not from a show breeder. But you see them showing at 4 lbs on occasion.

There's a lot of 'should not exceed' but no specification for how small is too small.

Poms are listed as 3-7 lbs.
__________________
Mia CGC - (5 year old Papillon)
Hank - (approx. 10 month old Spotty Dog)
Summer TG3 TIAD - (10 year old Papillon)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:59 PM
PoodleMommy PoodleMommy is offline
Yorkie Love
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurelin View Post
Well the problem imo lies in not specifying a lower end for the weight. I know chis can be 2-3 lbs as well as yorkies and poms and even occasionally paps though the smallest I've seen in the ring is about 3 ish lbs. (not a puppy) The smallest papillon I know is 2.5 lbs but not from a show breeder. But you see them showing at 4 lbs on occasion.

There's a lot of 'should not exceed' but no specification for how small is too small.

Poms are listed as 3-7 lbs.
okay, I see what your saying.

Yes, I think there should be a lower end standard specifically stated... for yorkies I think 4 pounds is good... so 4-7 pounds would be a better way to state the standard.

But, even if it was specifically stated by the AKC I dont think it would make much of a difference in the dogs we see out there, because like I said before good breeders are already breeding to this standard... and those who arent probably wouldnt care either way.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.


1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site