Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > The Breeding Ground


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 05-25-2013, 09:38 AM
MandyPug's Avatar
MandyPug MandyPug is offline
Sport Model Pug
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 5,172
Default

Izzie was spayed at 16 months and she got snarkier and less dog oriented toward 3 or 4. I think it's just a normal personality growth/maturity thing and sometimes it happens to coincide with a spay or other major event.

ETA: I'm glad I spayed her, it makes trialling so much easier because I don't have to worry about heat cycles.
__________________

Izzie the Wonderpug RA AGIS AGJIS MADC AGDC MSDC CGN

The Proudest Pug
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 05-25-2013, 10:06 AM
JessLough JessLough is offline
Love My Mutt <3
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 13,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post
So those of us who have chosen to traditionally alter DON'T want what's best for their dogs? That seems like a pretty sweeping and uninformed generalization...
If you go around posting that you'll always do a traditional spay because it's cheaper? Sounds like money is your first priority there
__________________
Ella: 2 1/2 year old female ferret
Nacho: ~7 year old male ferret

Goodbye, Rosey. You were the best girl I could have asked for. 10/15/96-03/08/13
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 05-25-2013, 10:08 AM
Dogdragoness's Avatar
Dogdragoness Dogdragoness is offline
FINALLY warm ... YAY :D
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gillett/San Antonio TX
Posts: 3,364
Default

I agree, I have been told I am cruel for choosing to spay & neuter my dogs, well most I them are rescues so they were fixed before I got them so I didn't have a choice when it comes to them.

Izze was spayed at 6 mos, & she got snarky/bitchy when she hit about 4 or so & I dot think it had anything to do with the fact that she was spayed.

When I nUtered bear at 4 years old I didn't see any change in him.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 05-25-2013, 10:14 AM
Linds's Avatar
Linds Linds is offline
Twin 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,643
Default

I spayed Hannah at 6 and did see a very distinct change in her behavior to other dogs. She went from being the hall monitor, all dogs must follow the rules to having absolutely no tolerance for any of them.

I can't say for sure if that was a direct side effect but it was something I noticed and to be fair she already leaned in that direction.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 05-25-2013, 10:23 AM
JacksonsMom's Avatar
JacksonsMom JacksonsMom is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurelin View Post

FWIW Mia seems pretty well the same as prior to her spay as far as bitchyness goes. I think she has gotten more snarky in the past 2 years but she's also more mature. I would not attribute snarkiness at 2 or 3 years old to a spay. I would think it was mostly maturity...
This. I've noticed Jackson has gotten snarkier after he was about 3 1/2. He was neutered at 7 months. Didn't really have much 'snark' until after 3, so I wouldn't attribute that to fixing, but maturity. And I know he's a boy, and we're talking about girls and spaying, but just thought I'd pop in my .02 cents.

I will probably always traditionally spay/neuter my dogs. It's not because I'm taking the cheap route, or don't want what's best for my dogs.... I just don't really think it's as big of a deal as some make it out to be. I personally wouldn't make the effort to get a vasectomy on my dog because I just don't think it would be worth it. It's definitely not about money for me. Heck, I spent $1500 to have basically a 'root canal' on my dog instead of pulling it, because it's a major tooth and I didn't want to. I could've easily saved over $1000 doing it that way.

But I understand people's reasons for doing it, and I guess just like I'm very much against over-vaccination and a lot of people don't see the big deal, it's just different issues people are more passionate about, I guess. Some think I'm crazy when I say I probably won't be getting him vaccinated for anything that's not required by law for the rest of his life. So be it! lol. So I understand when you really care deeply about an issue and respect the decision completely. But I don't think people who traditionally spay/neuter should be looked at as not doing what is best for their dogs.
__________________

Brit & Jackson


Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 05-25-2013, 10:38 AM
sillysally's Avatar
sillysally sillysally is offline
Obey the Toad.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: A hole in the bottom of the sea.
Posts: 4,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JessLough View Post
If you go around posting that you'll always do a traditional spay because it's cheaper? Sounds like money is your first priority there
I absolutely want what's best for my dogs, but cost of a procedure does factor in for me when opting for an elective surgery. I don't know that the benefits of having a vasectomy are worth traveling a couple of hundred miles and plunking down $1500 when I would be waiting until my male is fully grown to neuter anyway.
__________________

~Christina--Mom to:
Sally--8 yr old pit bull mix
Jack--6 yr old Labrador
Sadie & Runt--12 yr old calico DSHs
Pickles & Kiwi--3 yr old white winged parakeets
Yoda--1 yr old Quaker parrot
Solo--12 yr old Senegal parrot
Sheena--Quarter Horse--3/24/86-6/23/11--Rest Easy Sweet Girl~




Labs do it in the lake.


Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 05-25-2013, 11:46 AM
Dogdragoness's Avatar
Dogdragoness Dogdragoness is offline
FINALLY warm ... YAY :D
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gillett/San Antonio TX
Posts: 3,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post
I absolutely want what's best for my dogs, but cost of a procedure does factor in for me when opting for an elective surgery. I don't know that the benefits of having a vasectomy are worth traveling a couple of hundred miles and plunking down $1500 when I would be waiting until my male is fully grown to neuter anyway.
That is my view as well ... Why would I dump money that I have but really don't see the point in needlessly spending on an elective surgery when the cheaper alternative works just as well to achieve the desired effect (sterilizing the dog).

I would much rather save my money in the event there is an ACTUAL real medical emergency with my dogs rather then waste money on an elective surgery. Others might have that kind o money but I do not.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 05-25-2013, 12:11 PM
Linds's Avatar
Linds Linds is offline
Twin 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,643
Default

Well luckily, I believe that OSS and vasectomies will become more in demand as more studies and education happens and people become more aware to the overall risks vs benefits of spaying and neutering. And if that happens it'll probably become a more common request for vets and be available more widely which would hopefully cut any costs down.

Though at this time it doesn't seem like there is a huge (if any) discrepancy in price if you find a vet who is proficient in them, but finding a vet who is willing and able is harder.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 05-25-2013, 02:56 PM
Dogdragoness's Avatar
Dogdragoness Dogdragoness is offline
FINALLY warm ... YAY :D
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gillett/San Antonio TX
Posts: 3,364
Default

I will probably always have a spayed or neutered dog because i will always have at least one rescue or shelter dog at some point or another who will always have the procedure done before they come to me.

But as far as my own dogs, I might wait longer to sterilize, but as long as that remains the cheaper option, that is what I will do.

FWIW for me, who isn't rolling in money, the cheaper option IS the bet for the dogs because I don't want an emergency to catch me short of money because I decided to do the OSS procedure on my female or give my male a vasectomy instead of spay/neuter.

Imagine also how high adoption fees would be if shelters & rescue groups were forced to do OSS/vasectomies instead of the cheaper spay/neuter bdcsuse a few people think that spay/neutering is inhumane or wrong?

Think of me what you like but I will stick with spay/ neutering.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 05-25-2013, 03:07 PM
Linds's Avatar
Linds Linds is offline
Twin 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,643
Default

Sometimes Dogdragoness it's very difficult to have a discussion on here with you. I don't know if it's because you skim read or don't bother to read the posts but it gets frustrating. But maybe that's just me.

*No one is saying everyone should do that instead of typical altering. At all. Whatsoever. Just that the option is there and slowly becoming more well known.

*No one is saying rescues need to do it either but I do know of rescues other than Blossom that have been allowing people when adopting to do that rather than traditional altering. Which I think is absolutely great. I also thinks it's a valid option that rescues have to look into for puppies instead of pediatric traditional s/n.

*Not looking at low cost s/n clinics it seems like the actual cost of vasectomies and OSS by proficient vets is NOT that much (if at all) more costly than traditional s/n typically.

It's finding a vet that does them that can be difficult and gas bills like SillySally pointed out. But again, more attention payed to it, more people ask for it and I see that changing.

So again, do whatever you want! That's fine! No one is telling you what to do, just to keep your mind open.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.


1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site