De-Barking your dog..

Swiftwind

Harley & Abby
Joined
May 29, 2005
Messages
375
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Australia
#81
RD said:
I'd think it's certainly far more humane than keeping one of those awful shock or citronella collars on the dog to deter barking.
Just wondering... How is a citronella collar less humane than de-barking a dog?

I think it would be much more humane than de-barking a dog. My dog Harley was a HUGE barker and would constantly bark every day, morning and night. We have done extensive training to train him out of his barking habits - it IS possible. He still has occasional days where he will be noisy, but he is so much better than he used to be. I just think that de-barking is not directly solving the problem. It's more of a way to cover it up. And you say dogs don't use barking/their voice as a way to communicate, but they do. They may use body language more, but their voice is also a vital way of getting their message across. I just don't think it's fair to rid a dog of his voice because you/others can't put up with the barking. Try and look into the reason for your dogs barking - the most common posibility is boredom.

All in all, de-barking is a last resort in my mind.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
726
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
47
Location
Alabama, U.S.
#82
Old Dog said:
She was banned becaused she called a spade a spade. I believe it was called" name calling' which was a little stretching the point. When someone says untrue things about you and you call them down on it .........I guess you get banned. The other person should have been banned also they started it. Manchester loves her dogs. They are NOT kenneled all the time and are NOT all debarked. She loves all dogs and would never be cruel to anything. I know, I have known her for over 30 years! Hers dogs are well taken care of and spoiled rotten. And it really ticks me off for people to say she abuses her dogs or anything like that.
I think it had to do with her overall behavior on the site not just this one thread. It seemed like it was tolerable and funny at first but then it got progressively worse and worse. Not just name calling (although that happened a lot) but a general disregard towards members. j.m.o.
 
Y

yuckaduck

Guest
#83
Old Dog said:
She was banned becaused she called a spade a spade. I believe it was called" name calling' which was a little stretching the point. When someone says untrue things about you and you call them down on it .........I guess you get banned. The other person should have been banned also they started it. Manchester loves her dogs. They are NOT kenneled all the time and are NOT all debarked. She loves all dogs and would never be cruel to anything. I know, I have known her for over 30 years! Hers dogs are well taken care of and spoiled rotten. And it really ticks me off for people to say she abuses her dogs or anything like that.

I agree completely and I will maintain my friendship with her. She sure had a lot of valuable knowledge to share for those who wanted to learn.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
3,317
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Florida
#84
I am the owner and this is my personal website. Born and raised in the south, I'm not from russia, china, or any other country.

If you attack fellow members personally you can expect to be suspended. We do note if you were 'drawn' into it or not and by who. It isn't that hard to debate the issues and not insult the person. We are very open and usually allow everyone to have their say, good or bad, but will draw the line on personal attacks.
Usually we would suspend a member before banning one unless they are overly abusive. In this case suspension was the penalty. Also, please do not post another member's personal correspondence or information on this forum.

Thank you for your cooporation,
Chazhound
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#85
Swiftwind said:
Just wondering... How is a citronella collar less humane than de-barking a dog?

I think it would be much more humane than de-barking a dog. My dog Harley was a HUGE barker and would constantly bark every day, morning and night. We have done extensive training to train him out of his barking habits - it IS possible. He still has occasional days where he will be noisy, but he is so much better than he used to be. I just think that de-barking is not directly solving the problem. It's more of a way to cover it up. And you say dogs don't use barking/their voice as a way to communicate, but they do. They may use body language more, but their voice is also a vital way of getting their message across. I just don't think it's fair to rid a dog of his voice because you/others can't put up with the barking. Try and look into the reason for your dogs barking - the most common posibility is boredom.

All in all, de-barking is a last resort in my mind.
Look at it this way: a shock or citronella collar is a punishment for barking. If dogs dislike the shock or the blast of citronella enough to stop barking, that means it is extremely unpleasant. Most dogs, in an attempt to avoid that, will stop making noise entirely. What fun is that? Some dogs (Shelties, Poms, etc.) LOVE to bark and I think it's more humane to muffle their bark than to tell them they can't bark at ALL or they'll get shocked or blasted with something foul.

What I don't think you understand is that dogs who have been debarked do not lose their voice. They do still make a quiet noise. Now, if you have a dog that lives in a huge pack, by all means don't debark it because yes, it probably will need its voice to be loud on occasion. But for your average housedog? Honestly, they can still communicate with a quiet bark.

De-barking -is- a last resort. I would never do it unless I had tried everything else.. My argument is that I have seen it done, I have seen the 'end result' and I don't see how people can call a simple, mild procedure "cruel" when they don't know a whole lot about it.

That's JMO, though. :)
 

SummerRiot

Dog Show Addict
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
8,056
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
40
Location
Ontario, Canada
#86
*update*

Well I have some good News about Jada the squirt bottle has sunk into her little head that barking is bad, now she will occationally forget this, but now she is basically under control about it.

If worst came to worst, yes she would have been de-barked no doubt, but it looks like she is pulling through for herself.
 

Swiftwind

Harley & Abby
Joined
May 29, 2005
Messages
375
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Australia
#87
I guess we have our own opinions! :D
I'm for citronella collars, you're for de-barking (I know.. as a last resort).

I know that de-barked dogs don't lose their voice completely, but I truely hate that muffled bark, and de-barking a dog is a permanent procedure. Once it's done there's no going back. Also, dogs also use different pitches when trying to communicate, and I think this would be pretty hard to do with a bark that's not really there. And, like you said if it's a house dog and doesn't have any reason to bark so much, than the citronella collar can be used to teach the dog that it doesn't need to be barking all the time.

(Sorry if I'm not making too much sense, I'm feeling a bit sick today :().
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top