Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > The Dog Breeds


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:52 PM
Boemy's Avatar
Boemy Boemy is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,481
Default The original BYBers?

So I was reading up on the history of the Boston Terrier of Wikipedia and it said one of their ancestors was the now-extinct White English Terrier.

I followed the link to the White English Terrier, expecting an old breed that was lost due to unforeseen circumstances. But no, it turns out the White English Terrier was "created" specifically for dog shows when they were the "in" thing--possibly by breeding together a fox terrier and an Italian Greyhound! Apparentally creating your own breed was all the rage . . .

Quote:
In the rush to create and claim new breeds, competing groups of dog breeders sometimes came up with different names for the same dog, and it was very common for entirely fictional breed histories to be cobbled up as part of a campaign to declare a new breed and create a bit of personal distinction for a dog's originator (to say nothing of sales).
I've got to admit I'm a bit shocked to find the "labradoodle" habit goes back so far.

The White English Terrier became extinct, by the way, because they were unsuccessful as rat hunters (being all white, many were deaf) and the public was unenthralled with their health problems.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2007, 02:17 PM
sp0322 sp0322 is offline
Puppy Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Default

Wow.. that is shocking.. I can't believe that it goes that far back
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2007, 05:55 AM
mrose_s's Avatar
mrose_s mrose_s is offline
BusterLove
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: QLD, Australia
Posts: 12,150
Default

wow... so i gues its a people trait to want to create new breeds and name them
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2007, 08:31 AM
Miakoda's Avatar
Miakoda Miakoda is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,661
Default

The crossing of breeds is how others came to be.

It's just nowadays we pretty much have breeds that can do any given task & enough "bred to be pets" breeds that we don't need to create any more. The only reason people are creating these new mutts is for money & status. Nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:25 AM
Boemy's Avatar
Boemy Boemy is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,481
Default

Quote:
The crossing of breeds is how others came to be.
I agree, but the English White Terrier article is refering to breeds created specifically for the show ring . . . Not for actually hunting rats or other animals or even as companion animals, but simply so that the breeders could gain notoriety and make money. (The article also says they were riddled with health problems, which is why they weren't popular with the general public.) That makes them BYBers, IMO. If a farmer crossed two different terriers trying to develop a better rat-hunting dog, well, that's different.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2007, 02:23 PM
PixieSticksandTricks's Avatar
PixieSticksandTricks PixieSticksandTricks is offline
Athletic Labs. They Exist
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,799
Default

The White English Terrier

( Originally Published 1920 )


This is a comparatively new breed, and is the only Terrier that bears the national name. There is no evidence to show where it originally sprang from, who produced it, or for what reason.

Before the institution of dog shows the generic term "Terrier" was applied to all earth dogs, and it would be difficult to prove that a white Terrier resembling those now under consideration existed at that time. There is little difference between the white English Terrier and the Manchester blackwhite-and-tan, except in color, for they are of similar shape and general character.

The standard as laid down by the White English Terrier Club is as follows:

HEAD.-Narrow, long, and level; almost flat skull, without cheek muscles, wedge-shaped, well filled up under the eyes, tapering to the nose, and not lippy.

EYES.-Small and black, set fairly close together, and oblong in shape.

NOSE.-Perfectly black.

EARS.-Cropped and standing perfectly erect.

NECK AND SHOULDERS.-The neck should be fairly long and tapering from the shoulders to the head, with sloping shoulders, the neck being free from throatiness, and slightly arched at the occiput. CHEST.-Narrow and deep.

BODY.-Short and curving upward at the loins; sprung out behind the shoulders, back slightly arched at loins, and falling again at the joining of the tail to the same height as the shoulders.

LEGS.-Perfectly straight and well under the body, moderate in bone, and of proportionate length.

FEET.-Feet nicely arched, with toes set well together, and more inclined to be round than harefooted.

TAIL.-Moderate length, and set on where the arch of the back ends, thick where it joins the body, tapering to a point, and not carried higher than the back.

COAT.-Close, hard, short, and glossy. COLOR.-Pure white; colored marking to disqualify.

CONDITION.-Flesh and muscles to be hard and firm.

WEIGHT.-From 12 t0 20 pounds.
__________________
Sporting Dogs Make Me Smile
Mom to-
Maggie May (5 year old, American Cocker Spaniel)
Sawyer (2 year old, Labrador Retriever)
Morisson (2 year old, Lab/Beagle)
And aunt to-
Grace
aka my brothers/roommates dog.(1 year old, Lab/Shiba Inu)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.


1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site