Originally Posted by Skits
The kid did take the dogs property, on the dogs property. There was also a picture of him with another child and perfectly fine and seeming relaxed. The dog probably just reacted badly to the situation but I don't think he should be pts.
I just feel like the case is different because the child was on their dogs property. If it was anywhere else, I'd have a totally different opinion.
Reacted badly? Have you looked at the pictures of the child?
"As for Kevin, he is still healing after suffering a broken eye socket, fractured jaw and multiple gashes to his face."
Sorry, that's a lot more than "reacted badly".
Put the dog down. The fact that this is even being debated is just ridiculous.