Dog Site - Dog Stuff
Dog Forum | Dog Pictures

Go Back   Chazhound Dog Forum > Dog Discussions and Dog Talk Forums > Dogs - General Dog Chat


View Poll Results: Would you co-own a dog?
Yes 27 58.70%
No 13 28.26%
Other - Please explain 7 15.22%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:38 PM
SevenSins's Avatar
SevenSins SevenSins is offline
APBTs & One Crazy Banana
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Romy View Post
Then why does the name on the registration papers affect who gets the dog in division of property in a divorce case?
They're divided like any other property. The only time I've seen the actual registration papers come into play is with the registry themselves, who have special situational regulations involving removing co-ownership status from whichever party lost the dog in a divorce. Certainly didn't come into play at all in my divorce. I got all of the dogs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by release the hounds View Post
my last 4 dogs have been co-owns, tell me all about them.
If you breed them, the co-owner will have to sign off on the forms in order for the litter to be registered. If you sell them and want their new owners to have their papers, the co-owner will have to sign off on them. Everything else is a contractual issue between you and whoever you're under contract with, and don't actually have much to do with whether they're under co-ownership. There you go.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:42 PM
Raegan's Avatar
Raegan Raegan is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 435
Default

I think the biggest danger in a co-own is ambiguity. I am open to the idea for myself, but it's not something I would either seek out or avoid.

I would require a solid contract that details each party's rights and responsibilities, and perhaps a clause that says in the case of irreconcilable differences, the ultimate decision is mine. Possibly terms for ending the co-own as well.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:45 PM
release the hounds release the hounds is online now
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,178
Default

this reminds me of an Anthrax song.

someone wants to change the argument to fit what they want to argue. Meanwhile the rest of us are on something else. A co-own is one thing, a co-ownership agreement is another. If stipulations are added into the agreement they become part of the co-ownership agreement. Is it really that hard to understand

you're stuck on co-owner while the rest are talking about co-own agreements, which is a contract with very little restriction of what can and can not be placed in that contract.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:55 PM
Maliraptor's Avatar
Maliraptor Maliraptor is offline
Bite me.
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern California- The Desert Part
Posts: 820
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianneIsabel View Post
What would turn you, or anyone, off of a co-own?

Any tricky things to be aware of?

I still haven't spoken directly with the potential for co-ownership so I'm not about all of the details.
I've had some good co-owns, and some not so good. My BIG issue is, how much control do you have? I raised and showed a dog to her championship. We had a deal with a litter back.

Before the litter, I got a lot of pressure for shows. She showed as much as I could afford, but the co-owner wanted her out more. I said I just afford the time off/sending her with a handler every weekend, the co-owner was upset. There was NOTHING about needed to show her AT ALL in the contract.

Second issue was, co-owner wanted her bred. I was not a fan of her temperament, really did not want to breed her. Understood we had to, she was Champion and OFA H/E, I had NO choice in stud dog. She was bred to a dog who's temperament was WAY WAY WAY below par IMO. I was horrified I was part of this, and actually ended up giving the female back to the breeder, at a loss of quite a bit of money and a pet we'd all loved.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:59 PM
Saeleofu Saeleofu is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,036
Default

Quote:
you're stuck on co-owner while the rest are talking about co-own agreements, which is a contract with very little restriction of what can and can not be placed in that contract.
There is definitely a difference between co-owning, and the contract that goes along with co-owning. Of course a contract can contain whatever, regardless of co-owning or not. But there are certain things that tend to go into co-owner contracts that aren't common in others.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:10 PM
frostfell's Avatar
frostfell frostfell is offline
Kung Pow Fish
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 951
Default

i will do it for most of my puppies, and I would consider doing it with other breeders. Everything has to be spelled out very clearly, however, so theres no misunderstanding, and everyone has to be happy with it. You cant just halfass a contract/agreement and expect everyone to magically be on the same page and comfortable with it.

I think if done correctly, it can be a great situation, for whatever reason.

I personally dont trust my breed farther than I can throw them, so ALL my dogs will be co owned with their buyers, but my involvement will simply be a name on the papers so I can keep "tabs" on people and what theyre doing with my bloodlines. I will not actually be a busybody in anypuppies lives, unless its asked for
__________________
"We possess the power
If this should start to fall apart
To mend divides
To change the world
To reach the farthest star
If we should stay silent
If fear should win our hearts
Our light will have long diminished
Before it reaches the farthest star"

-Ronan Harris, NVN Nation
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:12 PM
Flyinsbt's Avatar
Flyinsbt Flyinsbt is offline
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 886
Default

Tully was co-owned, and Pirate is co-owned, so clearly, I would. I think it depends on why, and who you're co-owning with. I've heard of situations in which it's gone really badly, and obviously, in my case it's been great.

I'm wary of contractual obligations towards breeding, whether it be a co-ownership or not, and many co-ownerships are about breeding. Breeding is a huge undertaking, it can be really tough on the breeder, and I don't like to see people pressured into it. Plus, there's considerations about how it's decided if the dog is even worth breeding. I know someone who got a bitch from one of the "puppy back" pyramid scheme people (sell bitches, require the bitch be bred and that a certain amount of puppies come back, take bitch puppies, sell those under the same agreement....) When my friend decided the bitch didn't really have anything to offer the breed, she had to pay for her again to allow her to not breed the bitch.

In my case, Tully was co-owned because her breeder sells all her pups on a co-ownership, until they are altered, to avoid indiscriminate breeding. I wouldn't have had a problem with that, though in fact, I also didn't pay for Tully, her breeder gave her to me. There were no other real stipulations. She asked me to put a title on her, but that was kind of a joke, because she knew I would anyway. I thought she might not want me to breed Tully, but when I started considering it, I discussed it with the breeder, and she was fine with it. Provided mentorship.

So, obviously an ideal co-ownership from my standpoint, all the benefits were really to me.

I put Tess into a lease in both our names when she was bred, because the original idea was that we'd each get a pup from the breeding, and she wanted to be able to show in bred by. As it happened, there were only the 2 pups, and my co-breeder decided Eva wouldn't suit her purposes (I had tried to get her to take first choice, but she insisted that 1st choice should be mine). I felt bad that she didn't get her pup, and I hadn't even paid a stud fee, so I offered to co-own Pirate with her. That's why he is co-owned. As with his grandma Tully, he's basically my dog, but he has someone else's name on him as well.

It all works, because we're friends, and we have similar goals and beliefs about the breed. We don't agree on everything, but our points of disagreement are relatively minor. We don't have a contract, which is generally not advised, but I'm not expecting any issue from it, and since I have physical possession of the dog, the power is all mine. (though it's not impossible I'd send him to her to be shown. I trust her, though.)
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:25 PM
SevenSins's Avatar
SevenSins SevenSins is offline
APBTs & One Crazy Banana
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by release the hounds View Post
you're stuck on co-owner while the rest are talking about co-own agreements, which is a contract with very little restriction of what can and can not be placed in that contract.
Because what you're referring to as a "co-ownership agreement" doesn't actually have anything to do with whether or not a dog is co-owned. Using the term "CO-OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT" implies that the dog being co-owned has some bearing on the enforceability of the agreement. In nearly all cases, the fact that a dog is co-owned doesn't actually matter when it comes to what you agree to in a contract. Not really my fault that people can't seem to grasp that simple concept.

Let me give you an example. If I were to sell Paige for $5 to a home who wanted to keep her intact so that they could continue showing her, my contract would stipulate that she is not to be bred, amongst other things, and that if the contract was breached in whole or in part, the buyer would incur a penalty of $5000 per incident. A couple of these points are important in a legal sense...

That is something that most people commenting would consider a "co-ownership agreement." But it's not. The only parts of that agreement that give me more or less "power" are that I created a legal exchange by asking for a small amount of money rather than giving the dog away for free, and that I stipulated a specific penalty for breaching that portion of my contract. I could sell the dog with or without a co-ownership, and that agreement would be just as legally binding.

On the reverse side of the coin, my co-breeder and I are the ONLY ones on Cartman's papers, who is actually legally owned by a friend of ours. I have no right or claim to that dog, even as the dog's breeder, even as the "owner" on his registration papers. What was written and agreed to in my contract is the extent of my right to the dog, I can not legally walk up and take the dog unless a portion of my contract is breached that specifically allows me to repossess him. That said, I could transfer that dog solely into his legal owner's name, and that would have no effect on the contract I have between myself and his owner.

So, yeh, I'm stuck on "co-ownership" because so many people seem to be misinformed and believe that it is synonymous with contracts or agreements.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:42 PM
release the hounds release the hounds is online now
Top Dog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,178
Default

no that is something YOU want to consider a co-ownership agreement and then point out that it is WRONG and you're right it is wrong.

I and everyone else seems to be talking about being an actual co-owner and having agreement that will have other stipulations regarding stud fees, puppies, prices, who sells them, who cares for bitch in whelp, when signatures are to be given, who shows, who trains, health tests, and any other number of stipulations two owners of a dog might come to agree on.

I can buy a dog with my friend from anywhere and we can split that cost however we want and we can stipulate what each others responsibilities are as co-owners. to register puppies, we have to both sign paperwork as well. We can agree to pretty much anything else we want in a co-ownership contract, as happens with almost every single co-ownership agreement I've ever heard of.

we can grasp it, that co-ownership doesn't automatically give you or take away all these rights, but signing that agreement sure does and that's what Adrianne has asked about
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:56 PM
SevenSins's Avatar
SevenSins SevenSins is offline
APBTs & One Crazy Banana
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by release the hounds View Post
I and everyone else seems to be talking about being an actual co-owner and having agreement that will have other stipulations regarding stud fees, puppies, prices, who sells them, who cares for bitch in whelp, when signatures are to be given, who shows, who trains, health tests, and any other number of stipulations two owners of a dog might come to agree on.
What do any of those things have to do with co-ownership? You can agree to do any or all of those things, or not, with or without another party co-owning the dog. So why not just call it what it is? An agreement. Civil court really doesn't give a flying quart of hydrogenated wombat snot if your contract says "John Smith, hereinafter referred to as Co-Owner" or "John Smith, hereinafter referred to as Buyer."

Quote:
to register puppies, we have to both sign paperwork as well.
Dingdingdingdingding! You found the part where co-ownership actually matters. Congratulations.

Quote:
we can grasp it, that co-ownership doesn't automatically give you or take away all these rights, but signing that agreement sure does and that's what Adrianne has asked about
That's signing a legal agreement. Not a co-own. Adrianne asked, "Do you like Co-owns?" I'm just answering the question as it was written. If she meant to ask "Do you like to own dogs that come with legal stipulations?" that's an entirely different situation and a bit of a broad or open-ended question.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.


1997-2013 Chazhound Dog Site