|
#151
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with Fran.
It doesn't have to be black and white. A breeder can gush about their dogs as pets AND still emphasize their titles and health testing. I want both. Producing good dogs isn't the only important thing... I mean, I still want to be satisfied with the conditions they're being raised in before I give them my money and support anything. I'm not saying kennels = crappy conditions. I'm just saying I'm not going to purchase from a breeder JUST because I like the dogs they produce. But I think I mentioned at the beginning of the thread that Juno's breeder had kennels with indoor/outdoor access. Just so she didn't have all the dogs loose at one time. They were still house dogs. So I can't really form a judgment about using kennels cuz it totally depends on how they're being used.
__________________
![]() |
|
#152
|
|||
|
|||
|
and if i were looking to get a maltese or chihuahua etc, being house dogs would carry a lot more weight.
|
|
#153
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Especially with hunting dogs, livestock guardians, working stock dogs etc.. I can totally see why living inside the home would carry a different weight. The aussies I went with are show/obedience/agility dogs etc..so I did love that they lived in the home, it made sense..First and foremost, the temperament/working temperament I wanted is conducive to being a house dog. but if I was looking at a different breed/breed type (more serious working lines), I can certainly see why being a house dog would carry a different weight. |
|
#154
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
it just goes to show very little in life is absolutely right or wrong. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|