|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
My dogs listen to my hand signals better than they do my verbal commands. lol (I think it is because I babble on to much when I'm with them so they just tune me out. lol) I say their name to get them to look at me, but to do sit and stuff they mostly just listen to the hand signal. If I can't get Rose to sit by just my voice, I use the hand signal and wa-la! She sits! lol Once they get the command, they usally can do it without my hand signal but sometimes they need it as extra incouargment. lol
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am trying to teach my my saint but seems we need more time to learn PT...lol We are making slow progress, but making it.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with Rosie's Gal. I'm sure my constant stream of chatter to my dogs is a big source of consternation for them. "Was there a command in there somewhere?" haha!
__________________
Emma Barnett Instructor, Relationship Coach Paws & Effect Training Denver, CO paws.effect.training@gmail.com |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have always used hand signals as well as vocal commands for training my boys. One of my dogs Soda, is completely deaf so he only works to the hand signals, I do say the words too as he reads your facial expressions as well. Since getting Soda I have done a lot of reserch into signing for dogs. It seems that a lot of people base their signs on American sign language. I do use some of those signs but have made up a few of my own. I have also read about a lot of people who teach both signs and commands as a lot of dogs loose their hearing as they get older and it means that you can still communicate with them should this happen. Which is something I hadn't thought of before but it seems like a good idea.
Lynn |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
|